Florida Statute 767.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLV
TORTS

Chapter 767
DAMAGE BY DOGS; DANGEROUS DOGS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 767.02

767.02 Sheep-killing dogs not to roam about.—It is unlawful for any dog known to have killed sheep to roam about over the country unattended by a keeper. Any such dog found roaming over the country unattended shall be deemed a run-about dog, and it is lawful to kill such dog.

History.—s. 1, ch. 4185, 1893; GS 3143; RGS 4958; CGL 7045.

F.S. 767.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 767.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 767.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 767.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 767.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 767.02

Total Results: 6

Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure & Florida Rules for Certified & Court-Appointed Mediators

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-07-10

Citation: 696 So. 2d 763, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 409, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1018, 1997 WL 377570

Snippet: training program certified by the supreme court; *767(2) observe a minimum of 4 county court mediation conferences

Rodgers v. WT Grant Company

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-06-30

Citation: 326 So. 2d 57

Snippet: 49 (Fla. 1974); and Priest v. Groover, 289 So.2d 767 (2 Fla.App. 1974). [5] Thompson v. Taylor, 183 So

American Security Insurance v. Perry

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-04-18

Citation: 198 So. 2d 86, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4742

Snippet: Vliet, 148 Fla. 568, 4 So.2d 862, 139 A.L.R. 767; (2) the insured’s absence at the trial was not prejudicial

Kiser v. Howard

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-10-24

Citation: 133 So. 2d 746

Snippet: [1] Stuart v. Stephanus, 94 Fla. 1087, 114 So. 767. [2] Lykes Bros., Inc. v. Brautcheck, Fla. App. 1958

Ball v. Inland Mutual Insurance Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-06-02

Citation: 121 So. 2d 470

Snippet: 132 So. 815, 816; Greene v. Miller, 102 Fla. 767, [2] Chase & Co. v. Benefield, Fla. 1953, 64 So.2d

Lithgow v. Hamilton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1954-01-15

Citation: 69 So. 2d 776, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1215

Snippet: 432; Potts v. Mulligan, 141 Fla. 685, 193 So. 767. (2) The pecuniary value of services which the husband