Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 768.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 768.07 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 768.07

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLV
TORTS
Chapter 768
NEGLIGENCE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 768.07
768.07 Railroad liability for injury to employees.If any person is injured by a railroad company by the running of the locomotives or cars, or other machinery of such company, the person being at the time of such injury an employee of the company, and the damage was caused by negligence of another employee, and without fault or negligence on the part of the person injured, her or his employment by the company shall be no bar to a recovery. No contract which restricts such liability shall be legal or binding.
History.s. 3, ch. 4071, 1891; GS 3150; RGS 4966; CGL 7053; s. 1160, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 768.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 768.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 768.07


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 768.07
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 768.07.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 768.07

Total Results: 3

Paul Durousseau v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-01-31T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 218 So. 3d 405, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 124, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 228

Snippet: professional norms. Occhicone, 768 -7- So. 2d at 1048 (concluding

Jansson v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-06-17T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 399 So. 2d 1061

Snippet: have split on the subject. See Annot. 96 A.L.R.2d 768 § 7(d). Illinois and South Carolina are examples of

Neal v. State Ex reL. Neal

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1961-12-20T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 135 So. 2d 891

Snippet: [6] Little v. Franklin (Fla. 1949), 40 So.2d 768. [7] Dahlke v. Dahlke (Fla. 1957), 97 So.2d 16, 17