Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 784.046 (2025)

Action by victim of repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence for protective injunction; dating violence investigations, notice to victims, and reporting; pretrial release violations; public records exemption.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

784.046 Action by victim of repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence for protective injunction; dating violence investigations, notice to victims, and reporting; pretrial release violations; public records exemption.—

(1) As used in this section, the term:

(a) “Violence” means any assault, aggravated assault, battery, aggravated battery, sexual assault, sexual battery, stalking, aggravated stalking, kidnapping, or false imprisonment, or any criminal offense resulting in physical injury or death, by a person against any other person.

(b) “Repeat violence” means two incidents of violence or stalking committed by the respondent, one of which must have been within 6 months of the filing of the petition, which are directed against the petitioner or the petitioner’s immediate family member.

1. Sexual battery, as defined in chapter 794;

2. A lewd or lascivious act, as defined in chapter 800, committed upon or in the presence of a person younger than 16 years of age;

3. Luring or enticing a child, as described in chapter 787;

4. Sexual performance by a child, as described in chapter 827; or

5. Any other forcible felony wherein a sexual act is committed or attempted,

regardless of whether criminal charges based on the incident were filed, reduced, or dismissed by the state attorney.

(d) “Dating violence” means violence between individuals who have or have had a continuing and significant relationship of a romantic or intimate nature. The existence of such a relationship shall be determined based on the consideration of the following factors:

1. A dating relationship must have existed within the past 6 months;

2. The nature of the relationship must have been characterized by the expectation of affection or sexual involvement between the parties; and

3. The frequency and type of interaction between the persons involved in the relationship must have included that the persons have been involved over time and on a continuous basis during the course of the relationship.

The term does not include violence in a casual acquaintanceship or violence between individuals who only have engaged in ordinary fraternization in a business or social context.

(2) There is created a cause of action for an injunction for protection in cases of repeat violence, there is created a separate cause of action for an injunction for protection in cases of dating violence, and there is created a separate cause of action for an injunction for protection in cases of sexual violence.

(a) Any person who is the victim of repeat violence or the parent or legal guardian of any minor child who is living at home and who seeks an injunction for protection against repeat violence on behalf of the minor child has standing in the circuit court to file a verified petition for an injunction for protection against repeat violence.

(b) Any person who is the victim of dating violence and has reasonable cause to believe he or she is in imminent danger of becoming the victim of another act of dating violence, or any person who has reasonable cause to believe he or she is in imminent danger of becoming the victim of an act of dating violence, or the parent or legal guardian of any minor child who is living at home and who seeks an injunction for protection against dating violence on behalf of that minor child, has standing in the circuit court to file a verified petition for an injunction for protection against dating violence.

(c) A person who is the victim of sexual violence or the parent or legal guardian of a minor child who is living at home who is the victim of sexual violence has standing in the circuit court to file a verified petition for an injunction for protection against sexual violence on his or her own behalf or on behalf of the minor child if:

1. The person has reported the sexual violence to a law enforcement agency and is cooperating in any criminal proceeding against the respondent, regardless of whether criminal charges based on the sexual violence have been filed, reduced, or dismissed by the state attorney; or

2. The respondent who committed the sexual violence against the victim or minor child was sentenced to a term of imprisonment in state prison for the sexual violence and the respondent’s term of imprisonment has expired or is due to expire within 90 days following the date the petition is filed.

(d) A cause of action for an injunction may be sought whether or not any other petition, complaint, or cause of action is currently available or pending between the parties.

(e) A cause of action for an injunction does not require that the petitioner be represented by an attorney.

(3)(a) The clerk of the court shall provide a copy of this section, simplified forms, and clerical assistance for the preparation and filing of such a petition by any person who is not represented by counsel.

(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the clerk of the court may not assess a fee for filing a petition for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence. However, subject to legislative appropriation, the clerk of the court may, each quarter, submit to the Justice Administrative Commission a certified request for reimbursement for petitions for protection issued by the court under this section at the rate of $40 per petition. The request for reimbursement must be submitted in the form and manner prescribed by the Justice Administrative Commission. From this reimbursement, the clerk shall pay the law enforcement agency serving the injunction the fee requested by the law enforcement agency; however, this fee may not exceed $20.

(d) The clerk of the court shall provide the petitioner with a certified copy of any injunction for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence entered by the court.

(4)(a) The verified petition shall allege the incidents of repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence and shall include the specific facts and circumstances that form the basis upon which relief is sought. With respect to a minor child who is living at home, the parent or legal guardian seeking the protective injunction on behalf of the minor child must:

1. Have been an eyewitness to, or have direct physical evidence or affidavits from eyewitnesses of, the specific facts and circumstances that form the basis upon which relief is sought, if the party against whom the protective injunction is sought is also a parent, stepparent, or legal guardian of the minor child; or

2. Have reasonable cause to believe that the minor child is a victim of repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence to form the basis upon which relief is sought, if the party against whom the protective injunction is sought is a person other than a parent, stepparent, or legal guardian of the minor child.

(b) The verified petition must be in substantially the following form:

PETITION FOR INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION
AGAINST REPEAT VIOLENCE, SEXUAL
VIOLENCE, OR DATING VIOLENCE

The undersigned petitioner (name) declares under penalties of perjury that the following statements are true:

1. Petitioner resides at (address) (A petitioner for an injunction for protection against sexual violence may furnish an address to the court in a separate confidential filing if, for safety reasons, the petitioner requires the location of his or her current residence to be confidential pursuant to s. 119.071(2)(j), Florida Statutes.)

2. Respondent resides at (address) .

3.a. Petitioner has suffered repeat violence as demonstrated by the fact that the respondent has: (enumerate incidents of violence)

b. Petitioner has suffered sexual violence as demonstrated by the fact that the respondent has: (enumerate incident of violence and include incident report number from law enforcement agency or attach notice of inmate release)

c. Petitioner is a victim of dating violence and has reasonable cause to believe that he or she is in imminent danger of becoming the victim of another act of dating violence or has reasonable cause to believe that he or she is in imminent danger of becoming a victim of dating violence, as demonstrated by the fact that the respondent has: (list the specific incident or incidents of violence and describe the length of time of the relationship, whether it has been in existence during the last 6 months, the nature of the relationship of a romantic or intimate nature, the frequency and type of interaction, and any other facts that characterize the relationship)

4. Petitioner genuinely fears repeat violence by the respondent.

5. Petitioner seeks: an immediate injunction against the respondent, enjoining him or her from committing any further acts of violence; an injunction enjoining the respondent from committing any further acts of violence; and an injunction providing any terms the court deems necessary for the protection of the petitioner and the petitioner’s immediate family, including any injunctions or directives to law enforcement agencies.

(c) Every petition for an injunction against sexual violence, dating violence, or repeat violence must contain, directly above the signature line, a statement in all capital letters and bold type not smaller than the surrounding text, as follows:

UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY, I DECLARE THAT I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING DOCUMENT AND THAT THE FACTS STATED IN IT ARE TRUE. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS PETITION ARE BEING MADE UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY, PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 92.525, FLORIDA STATUTES.

(initials)

(5) Upon the filing of the petition, the court shall set a hearing to be held at the earliest possible time. The respondent shall be personally served with a copy of the petition, notice of hearing, and temporary injunction, if any, prior to the hearing.

(6)(a) When it appears to the court that an immediate and present danger of violence exists, the court may grant a temporary injunction which may be granted in an ex parte hearing, pending a full hearing, and may grant such relief as the court deems proper, including an injunction enjoining the respondent from committing any acts of violence.

(b) Except as provided in s. 90.204, in a hearing ex parte for the purpose of obtaining such temporary injunction, no evidence other than the verified pleading or affidavit shall be used as evidence, unless the respondent appears at the hearing or has received reasonable notice of the hearing.

(c) Any such ex parte temporary injunction shall be effective for a fixed period not to exceed 15 days. However, an ex parte temporary injunction granted under subparagraph (2)(c)2. is effective for 15 days following the date the respondent is released from incarceration. A full hearing, as provided by this section, shall be set for a date no later than the date when the temporary injunction ceases to be effective. The court may grant a continuance of the ex parte injunction and the full hearing before or during a hearing, for good cause shown by any party.

(7) Upon notice and hearing, the court may grant such relief as the court deems proper, including an injunction:

(a) Enjoining the respondent from committing any acts of violence.

(b) Ordering such other relief as the court deems necessary for the protection of the petitioner, including injunctions or directives to law enforcement agencies, as provided in this section.

(c) The terms of the injunction shall remain in full force and effect until modified or dissolved. Either party may move at any time to modify or dissolve the injunction. Such relief may be granted in addition to other civil or criminal remedies.

(d) A temporary or final judgment on injunction for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence entered pursuant to this section shall, on its face, indicate that:

1. The injunction is valid and enforceable in all counties of the State of Florida.

2. Law enforcement officers may use their arrest powers pursuant to s. 901.15(6) to enforce the terms of the injunction.

3. The court had jurisdiction over the parties and matter under the laws of Florida and that reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard was given to the person against whom the order is sought sufficient to protect that person’s right to due process.

4. The date that the respondent was served with the temporary or final order, if obtainable.

(8)(a)1. Within 24 hours after the court issues an injunction for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence, the clerk of the court shall electronically transmit a copy of the petition, notice of hearing, and temporary injunction, if any, to the sheriff or a law enforcement agency of the county where the respondent resides or can be found, who shall serve it upon the respondent as soon thereafter as possible on any day of the week and at any time of the day or night. An electronic copy of an injunction must be certified by the clerk of the court, and the electronic copy must be served in the same manner as a certified copy. Upon receiving an electronic copy of the injunction, the sheriff must verify receipt with the sender before attempting to serve it upon the respondent. In addition, if the sheriff is in possession of an injunction for protection that has been certified by the clerk of the court, the sheriff may electronically transmit a copy of that injunction to a law enforcement officer who shall serve it in the same manner as a certified copy. The clerk of the court is responsible for furnishing to the sheriff such information on the respondent’s physical description and location as is required by the department to comply with the verification procedures set forth in this section. Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the chief judge of each circuit, in consultation with the appropriate sheriff, may authorize a law enforcement agency within the chief judge’s jurisdiction to effect this type of service and to receive a portion of the service fee. A person may not serve or execute an injunction issued under this section unless the person is a law enforcement officer as defined in chapter 943.

2. When an injunction is issued, if the petitioner requests the assistance of a law enforcement agency, the court may order that an officer from the appropriate law enforcement agency accompany the petitioner and assist in the execution or service of the injunction. A law enforcement officer must accept a copy of an injunction for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence, certified by the clerk of the court, from the petitioner and immediately serve it upon a respondent who has been located but not yet served.

(b) A Domestic, Dating, Sexual, and Repeat Violence Injunction Statewide Verification System is created within the Department of Law Enforcement. The department shall establish, implement, and maintain a statewide communication system capable of electronically transmitting information to and between criminal justice agencies relating to domestic violence injunctions, dating violence injunctions, sexual violence injunctions, and repeat violence injunctions issued by the courts throughout the state. Such information must include, but is not limited to, information as to the existence and status of any injunction for verification purposes.

(c)1. Within 24 hours after the court issues an injunction for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence or changes or vacates an injunction for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence, the clerk of the court must electronically transmit a copy of the injunction to the sheriff with jurisdiction over the residence of the petitioner.

2. Within 24 hours after service of process of an injunction for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence upon a respondent, the law enforcement officer must electronically transmit the written proof of service of process to the sheriff with jurisdiction over the residence of the petitioner.

3. Within 24 hours after the sheriff receives a certified copy of the injunction for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence, the sheriff must make information relating to the injunction available to other law enforcement agencies by electronically transmitting such information to the department.

4. Within 24 hours after the sheriff or other law enforcement officer has made service upon the respondent and the sheriff has been so notified, the sheriff must make information relating to the service available to other law enforcement agencies by electronically transmitting such information to the department.

5. Subject to available funding, the Florida Association of Court Clerks and Comptrollers shall develop an automated process by which a petitioner may request notification of service of the injunction for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence and other court actions related to the injunction for protection. The automated notice must be made within 12 hours after the sheriff or other law enforcement officer serves the injunction upon the respondent. The notification must include, at a minimum, the date, time, and location where the injunction for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence was served. The Florida Association of Court Clerks and Comptrollers may apply for any available grants to fund the development of the automated process.

6. Within 24 hours after an injunction for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence is lifted, terminated, or otherwise rendered no longer effective by ruling of the court, the clerk of the court must notify the sheriff or local law enforcement agency receiving original notification of the injunction as provided in subparagraph 2. That agency shall, within 24 hours after receiving such notification from the clerk of the court, notify the department of such action of the court.

(d) The petitioner may request a Hope Card under s. 741.311 after the court has issued a final order of protection.

(9)(a) The court shall enforce, through a civil or criminal contempt proceeding, a violation of an injunction for protection. The court may enforce the respondent’s compliance with the injunction by imposing a monetary assessment. The clerk of the court shall collect and receive such assessments. On a monthly basis, the clerk shall transfer the moneys collected pursuant to this paragraph to the State Treasury for deposit in the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund established in s. 960.21.

(b) If the respondent is arrested by a law enforcement officer under s. 901.15(6) for committing an act of repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence in violation of an injunction for protection, the respondent shall be held in custody until brought before the court as expeditiously as possible for the purpose of enforcing the injunction and for admittance to bail in accordance with chapter 903 and the applicable rules of criminal procedure, pending a hearing.

(10) The petitioner or the respondent may move the court to modify or dissolve an injunction at any time.

(11) Any law enforcement officer who investigates an alleged incident of dating violence shall assist the victim to obtain medical treatment if such is required as a result of the alleged incident to which the officer responds. Any law enforcement officer who investigates an alleged incident of dating violence shall advise the victim of such violence that there is a domestic violence center from which the victim may receive services. The law enforcement officer shall give the victim immediate notice of the legal rights and remedies available on a standard form developed and distributed by the Department of Law Enforcement. As necessary, the Department of Law Enforcement shall revise the Legal Rights and Remedies Notice to Victims to include a general summary of this section, using simple English as well as Spanish, and shall distribute the notice as a model form to be used by all law enforcement agencies throughout the state. The notice shall include:

(a) The resource listing, including telephone number, for the area domestic violence center designated by the Department of Children and Families; and

(b) A copy of the following statement: “IF YOU ARE THE VICTIM OF DATING VIOLENCE, you may ask the state attorney to file a criminal complaint. You also have the right to go to court and file a petition requesting an injunction for protection from dating violence which may include, but need not be limited to, provisions that restrain the abuser from further acts of abuse; direct the abuser to leave your household; and prevent the abuser from entering your residence, school, business, or place of employment.”

(12) When a law enforcement officer investigates an allegation that an incident of dating violence has occurred, the officer shall handle the incident pursuant to the arrest policy provided in s. 901.15(7), and as developed in accordance with subsections (13), (14), and (16). Whether or not an arrest is made, the officer shall make a written police report that is complete and clearly indicates that the alleged offense was an incident of dating violence. Such report shall be given to the officer’s supervisor and filed with the law enforcement agency in a manner that will permit data on dating violence cases to be compiled. Such report must include:

(a) A description of physical injuries observed, if any.

(b) If a law enforcement officer decides not to make an arrest or decides to arrest two or more parties, the grounds for not arresting anyone or for arresting two or more parties.

Whenever possible, the law enforcement officer shall obtain a written statement from the victim and witnesses concerning the alleged dating violence. The officer shall submit the report to the supervisor or other person to whom the employer’s rules or policies require reports of similar allegations of criminal activity to be made. The law enforcement agency shall, without charge, send a copy of the initial police report, as well as any subsequent, supplemental, or related report, which excludes victim or witness statements or other materials that are part of an active criminal investigation and are exempt from disclosure under chapter 119, to the nearest locally certified domestic violence center within 24 hours after the agency’s receipt of the report. The report furnished to the domestic violence center must include a narrative description of the dating violence incident.

(13) Whenever a law enforcement officer determines upon probable cause that an act of dating violence has been committed within the jurisdiction, or that a person has violated a condition of pretrial release as provided in s. 903.047 and the original arrest was for an act of dating violence, the officer may arrest the person or persons suspected of its commission and charge such person or persons with the appropriate crime. The decision to arrest and charge shall not require consent of the victim or consideration of the relationship of the parties.

(14)(a) When complaints are received from two or more parties, the officers shall evaluate each complaint separately to determine whether there is probable cause for arrest.

(b) If a law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe that two or more persons have committed a misdemeanor or felony, or if two or more persons make complaints to the officer, the officer shall try to determine who was the primary aggressor. Arrest is the preferred response only with respect to the primary aggressor and not the preferred response with respect to a person who acts in a reasonable manner to protect or defend himself or herself or another family or household member from dating violence.

(15) A person who willfully violates a condition of pretrial release provided in s. 903.047, when the original arrest was for an act of dating violence as defined in this section, commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083, and shall be held in custody until his or her first appearance.

(16) A law enforcement officer acting in good faith under this section and the officer’s employing agency shall be immune from all liability, civil or criminal, that might otherwise be incurred or imposed by reason of the officer’s or agency’s actions in carrying out the provisions of this section.

History.—s. 1, ch. 88-344; s. 70, ch. 88-381; s. 12, ch. 91-23; s. 7, ch. 94-134; s. 7, ch. 94-135; s. 14, ch. 94-170; s. 10, ch. 95-182; s. 38, ch. 95-184; s. 13, ch. 95-195; s. 1198, ch. 97-102; s. 8, ch. 97-155; s. 54, ch. 99-193; s. 21, ch. 2002-55; s. 2, ch. 2003-117; s. 1, ch. 2004-17; s. 142, ch. 2005-2; s. 1, ch. 2005-246; s. 109, ch. 2006-1; s. 2, ch. 2008-252; s. 8, ch. 2009-215; s. 2, ch. 2011-187; s. 2, ch. 2012-154; s. 297, ch. 2014-19; s. 5, ch. 2014-35; s. 3, ch. 2015-17; s. 2, ch. 2017-65; s. 9, ch. 2019-4; s. 53, ch. 2021-51; s. 2, ch. 2022-173; s. 3, ch. 2024-109; s. 2, ch. 2024-152; s. 6, ch. 2025-163.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 219 cases (16 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case: Amendments to the Florida Fam. Law Rules of Procedure & Fam. Law Forms, 810 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Amendments to the Florida Fam. Law Rules of Procedure & Fam. Law Forms, 810 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2000). · cites it 36× “1994) (modified by chapter 95-195, Laws of Florida), and section 784.046, Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), respectively.”

Lukacs v. Luton, 982 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). · cites it 24× “We think the more sound reading of the statute leads to the conclusion that the legislature added the phrase "or stalking" to ensure that victims who had already *1220 suffered repeated acts of following or harassment could obtain protective injunctions under section 784.046,…”

Pickett v. Copeland, 236 So. 3d 1142 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). · cites it 8× “Apparently, this two-incident requirement was adopted based upon "guidance" from the repeat violence statute-section 784.046, Florida Statutes -"which defines repeat violence as ' two incidents of violence or stalking committed by the respondent, one of which must have been…”

John Coffin v. Stacy Brandau, 642 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2011). · cites it 6× “Cynthia Coffin answered the door and Lutz explained that he had papers to deliver 2 The injunction had been issued by the Circuit Court of Charlotte County, pursuant to Fla. Stat. Ann. § 784.046 (West 2011). Section 784.”

In Re: Amendments to Florida Fam. Law Rules of Procedure, 214 So. 3d 400 (Fla. 2017). · cites it 15× “One of the comments pertaining to this proposal contends that it is in conflict with section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2016).”

Power v. Boyle, 60 So. 3d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). · cites it 16× “These cases, which we consolidate for purposes of this opinion, involve permanent injunctions against repeat violence entered against Andrea Power and Charles Fulford based on petitions filed by Richard and Martha Boyle under section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2010).”

Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2000). · cites it 4× “Finally, section 38 amends several portions of section 784.046, Florida Statutes, by imposing certain procedural duties on clerks of court and law enforcement officers regarding the filing and enforcement of domestic violence injunctions.”

Amendments to the Florida Fam. Law Rules, 713 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1998). · cites it 18× “1994) (modified by chapter 95-195, Laws of Florida), and section 784.046, Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), respectively.”

Amendments to Florida Supreme Court Approved Fam. Law Forms-Sexual Violence Forms, 871 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 2004). · cites it 40× “The 2003 Florida Legislature amended section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2002), to create a new cause of action for protection against sexual violence and to prohibit the assessment of fees for the filing of petitions for protection against repeat, dating, and sexual violence.”

Michael Paulson v. Sarah Rankart, 251 So. 3d 986 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). · cites it 7× “Paulson correctly points out that several district courts have interpreted the stalking statute with guidance from the repeat violence statute—section 784.046—which defines 1 Although the injunction has now expired, the appeal is not moot.”

McMath v. Biernacki, 776 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). · cites it 6× “Section 784.046, Florida Statutes (1999), authorizes an injunction for protection for victims of repeat violence.”

Levy v. Jacobs, 69 So. 3d 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). · cites it 10× “Multiple acts stemming from a single violent incident do not constitute “repeat violence” under section 784.046 where those acts were not separated by time or distance.”

Show all 219 citing cases →

— 784.046(1) — 3 cases

Lukacs v. Luton, 982 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). “We think the more sound reading of the statute leads to the conclusion that the legislature added the phrase "or stalking" to ensure that victims who had already *1220 suffered repeated acts of following or harassment could obtain protective injunctions under section 784.046,…”

Slack v. Kling, 959 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Sherry Corrie v. David Lee Keul, 160 So. 3d 97 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

— 784.046(1)(a) — 24 cases

McMath v. Biernacki, 776 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). “Section 784.046, Florida Statutes (1999), authorizes an injunction for protection for victims of repeat violence.”

Sorin v. Cole, 929 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Santiago v. Towle, 917 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Gagnard v. Sticht, 886 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

— 784.046(1)(b) — 28 cases

Pickett v. Copeland, 236 So. 3d 1142 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). “Apparently, this two-incident requirement was adopted based upon "guidance" from the repeat violence statute-section 784.046, Florida Statutes -"which defines repeat violence as ' two incidents of violence or stalking committed by the respondent, one of which must have been…”

Michael Paulson v. Sarah Rankart, 251 So. 3d 986 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). “Paulson correctly points out that several district courts have interpreted the stalking statute with guidance from the repeat violence statute—section 784.046—which defines 1 Although the injunction has now expired, the appeal is not moot.”

McMath v. Biernacki, 776 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). “Section 784.046, Florida Statutes (1999), authorizes an injunction for protection for victims of repeat violence.”

Santiago v. Towle, 917 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

— 784.046(1)(c) — 2 cases

Morrell v. Chadick, 965 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Yaidel Alfonso v. Zenilda Hierrezuelo, O/B/O Z.A. (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

— 784.046(1)(d) — 4 cases

Tyler Sumners v. Lindsey Thompson, 271 So. 3d 1232 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).

Acevedo v. Williams, 985 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Schutt v. Alfred, 130 So. 3d 772 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

Cs Ex Rel. Das v. Tsp, 82 So. 3d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

— 784.046(10) — 3 cases

McFarr v. McKee Ex Rel. J.M., 83 So. 3d 776 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

Jennifer Miley, O B O v. Jessica Dunn, by & Through Vicki Dunn, 264 So. 3d 219 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

Barfield v. Kay, 140 So. 3d 703 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014).

— 784.046(11) — 1 case

Blaylock v. Zeller, 932 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

— 784.046(2) — 27 cases

Polanco v. Cordeiro, 67 So. 3d 235 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

Cannon v. Thomas, 133 So. 3d 634 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Sorin v. Cole, 929 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Horne v. Endres, 61 So. 3d 428 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

— 784.046(2)(a) — 10 cases

State v. Wheeler, 745 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

Amendments to Florida Supreme Court Approved Fam. Law Forms, 849 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 2003).

Morrell v. Chadick, 965 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Tiger v. Marcus, 37 So. 3d 986 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Cannon v. Thomas, 133 So. 3d 634 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

— 784.046(2)(b) — 14 cases

Alderman v. Thomas, 141 So. 3d 668 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Tyler Sumners v. Lindsey Thompson, 271 So. 3d 1232 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).

Toubail v. White, 141 So. 3d 649 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Acevedo v. Williams, 985 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

H.K. ex rel. Colton v. Vocelle, 667 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

— 784.046(2)(c) — 5 cases

Tyler Sumners v. Lindsey Thompson, 271 So. 3d 1232 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).

Kuschnitzky v. Marasco (Fla. 1st DCA 2023).

Berthiaume v. B.S. ex rel. A.K., 85 So. 3d 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Donesha Hawthorne v. Otis Butler, 151 So. 3d 23 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Berthiaume v. BS EX REL. AK, 85 So. 3d 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

— 784.046(2)(c)(1) — 1 case

Edward David Colina v. Shiqian Jiang (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

— 784.046(3)(a) — 1 case

Nicole Lopez v. Sean Hall (Fla. 2018).

— 784.046(3)(b) — 4 cases

Amendments to the Florida Fam. Law Rules of Procedure & Fam. Law Forms, 810 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2000). “1994) (modified by chapter 95-195, Laws of Florida), and section 784.046, Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), respectively.”

Amendments to the Florida Fam. Law Rules, 713 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1998). “1994) (modified by chapter 95-195, Laws of Florida), and section 784.046, Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), respectively.”

In Re Fam. Law Rules of Procedure, 663 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 1995).

Yaidel Alfonso v. Zenilda Hierrezuelo, O/B/O Z.A. (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

— 784.046(4)(a) — 14 cases

The Florida Bar v. Germain, 957 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 2007).

Caldwell v. Caldwell ex rel. K.C., 257 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Chevaldina v. R.K./FL Mgmt., Inc., 133 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

In the Interest of A.B. v. R.B., 186 So. 3d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Rangel v. Torres, 77 So. 3d 708 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

— 784.046(4)(a)(1) — 1 case

Yefri Castro v. Stephanie Gutierrez O/B/O Destiny Castro (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

— 784.046(4)(a)(2) — 1 case

Yefri Castro v. Stephanie Gutierrez O/B/O Destiny Castro (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

— 784.046(4)(a)(l) — 1 case

In the Interest of A.B. v. R.B., 186 So. 3d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

— 784.046(4)(b) — 3 cases

Kuschnitzky v. Marasco (Fla. 1st DCA 2023).

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Supreme Court Approved Fam. Law Forms-12.913(a)(3)., 246 So. 3d 1131 (Fla. 2018).

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Supreme Court Approved Fam. Law Forms - 12.913(A)(3) (Fla. 2018).

— 784.046(5) — 2 cases

Polanco v. Cordeiro, 67 So. 3d 235 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

Donesha Hawthorne v. Otis Butler, 151 So. 3d 23 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

— 784.046(6) — 1 case

Porter v. Hoeft, 951 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

— 784.046(6)(a) — 14 cases

In Re: Amendments to Florida Fam. Law Rules of Procedure, 214 So. 3d 400 (Fla. 2017). “One of the comments pertaining to this proposal contends that it is in conflict with section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2016).”

Poindexter v. Springer, 898 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Amend. to Fl. Fam. Law Rules of Proc., 723 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 1998).

Ohrn v. Wright, 963 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

— 784.046(6)(ab) — 1 case

Amendments to the Florida Fam. Law Rules of Procedure, 853 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 2003).

— 784.046(6)(b) — 1 case

In re Amendments to the Florida Fam. Law Rules of Procedure, 905 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 2005).

— 784.046(6)(c) — 8 cases

Brand v. Elliott on Behalf of Elliott, 610 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Jennifer Putzig v. Kenneth Bresk, 183 So. 3d 1046 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

In the Interest of A.B. v. R.B., 186 So. 3d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

McNulty ex rel. G.M. v. Douglas ex rel. K.D., 111 So. 3d 231 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Porter v. Hoeft, 951 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

— 784.046(7) — 11 cases

Amend. to Fl. Fam. Law Rules of Proc., 723 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 1998).

In Re Fam. Law Rules of Procedure, 663 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 1995).

Amendments to the Florida Fam. Law Rules, 713 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1998). “1994) (modified by chapter 95-195, Laws of Florida), and section 784.046, Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), respectively.”

Jenkins v. Wessel, 780 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

— 784.046(7)(b) — 3 cases

Rae v. Flynn, 690 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Langner v. Cox, 826 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Jennifer Miley, O B O v. Jessica Dunn, by & Through Vicki Dunn, 264 So. 3d 219 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

— 784.046(7)(c) — 2 cases

York v. McCarron, 842 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Patterson v. Simonik, 709 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

— 784.046(7)(d)(2) — 1 case

Nicole Lopez v. Sean Hall (Fla. 2018).

— 784.046(7)(e) — 1 case

Knight v. Waters, 786 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

— 784.046(8)(c) — 1 case

Nicole Lopez v. Sean Hall (Fla. 2018).

— 784.046(9)(a) — 5 cases

Lopez v. Bentley, 678 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 1996).

Lopez v. Bentley, 660 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Steiner v. Bentley, 679 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 1996).

Ross v. Bentley, 678 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 1996).

Ramirez v. Bentley, 678 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 1996).

— 784.046(I)(b) — 1 case

Horne v. Endres, 61 So. 3d 428 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

— 784.046(b) — 2 cases

Darrow v. Moschella, 805 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Russell v. Hogan, 738 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

— 784.046(l)(a) — 27 cases

Power v. Boyle, 60 So. 3d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). “These cases, which we consolidate for purposes of this opinion, involve permanent injunctions against repeat violence entered against Andrea Power and Charles Fulford based on petitions filed by Richard and Martha Boyle under section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2010).”

Levy v. Jacobs, 69 So. 3d 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). “Multiple acts stemming from a single violent incident do not constitute “repeat violence” under section 784.046 where those acts were not separated by time or distance.”

Russell v. Doughty, 28 So. 3d 169 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Murphy v. Reynolds, 55 So. 3d 716 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

Sherry Corrie v. David Lee Keul, 160 So. 3d 97 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

— 784.046(l)(b) — 30 cases

Alkiviades A. David v. John Textor, 189 So. 3d 871 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Packal v. Johnson, 226 So. 3d 337 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Russell v. Doughty, 28 So. 3d 169 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

— 784.046(l)(c) — 2 cases

Cannon v. Thomas, 133 So. 3d 634 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Ostrow v. Imler Ex Rel. Di, 27 So. 3d 237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

— 784.046(l)(d) — 1 case

C.S. ex rel. D.A.S. v. T.S.P. ex rel. A.M.P., 82 So. 3d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.