Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 787.02 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 787.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 787.02 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 787.02

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 787
KIDNAPPING; CUSTODY OFFENSES; HUMAN TRAFFICKING; AND RELATED OFFENSES
View Entire Chapter
787.02 False imprisonment; false imprisonment of child under age 13, aggravating circumstances.
(1)(a) The term “false imprisonment” means forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against her or his will.
(b) Confinement of a child under the age of 13 is against her or his will within the meaning of this section if such confinement is without the consent of her or his parent or legal guardian.
(2) A person who commits the offense of false imprisonment is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(3)(a) A person who commits the offense of false imprisonment upon a child under the age of 13 and who, in the course of committing the offense, commits any offense enumerated in subparagraphs (a)1.-6., commits a felony of the first degree, punishable by imprisonment for a term of years not exceeding life or as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
1. Aggravated child abuse, as defined in s. 827.03;
2. Sexual battery, as defined in chapter 794, against the child;
3. Lewd or lascivious battery, lewd or lascivious molestation, lewd or lascivious conduct, or lewd or lascivious exhibition, in violation of s. 800.04 or s. 847.0135(5);
4. A violation of former s. 796.03 or s. 796.04, relating to prostitution, upon the child;
5. Exploitation of the child or allowing the child to be exploited, in violation of s. 450.151; or
6. A violation of s. 787.06(3)(g) or (5), relating to human trafficking.
(b) Pursuant to s. 775.021(4), nothing contained herein shall be construed to prohibit the imposition of separate judgments and sentences for the first degree offense described in paragraph (a) and for each separate offense enumerated in subparagraphs (a)1.-6.
History.s. 43, sub-ch. 3, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2399; GS 3225; RGS 5057; CGL 7159; s. 783, ch. 71-136; s. 23, ch. 74-383; s. 13, ch. 75-298; s. 1, ch. 84-238; s. 2, ch. 90-120; s. 1, ch. 93-156; ss. 2, 18, ch. 93-227; s. 9, ch. 96-322; s. 1814, ch. 97-102; s. 5, ch. 99-201; s. 3, ch. 2000-246; s. 19, ch. 2008-172; s. 20, ch. 2014-160; s. 95, ch. 2015-2; s. 6, ch. 2025-156.
Note.Former s. 805.01.

F.S. 787.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 787.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 787.02


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 787.02
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S787.02 2 - KIDNAP-FALSE IMPRISONMENT - REMOVED - F: T
S787.02 2 - KIDNAP-FALSE IMPRISONMENT - FALSE IMPRISONMENT OF PERSON - F: T
S787.02 1a - KIDNAP-FALSE IMPRISONMENT - REMOVED - F: T
S787.02 1b - KIDNAP-FALSE IMPRISONMENT - REMOVED - F: T
S787.02 3a1 - KIDNAP-FALSE IMPRISONMENT - CHILD UNDER 13 YOA AND COMMIT AGGRAVATED ABUSE - F: F
S787.02 3a2 - KIDNAP-FALSE IMPRISONMENT - CHILD UNDER 13 YOA AND COMMIT SEXUAL BATTERY - F: F
S787.02 3a3 - KIDNAP-FALSE IMPRISONMENT - CHILD UNDR 13YOA LEWD LASC BAT MOLEST COND EXH - F: F
S787.02 3a4 - KIDNAP-FALSE IMPRISONMENT - CHILD UNDER 13 YOA FOR PROSTITUTION - F: F
S787.02 3a5 - KIDNAP-FALSE IMPRISONMENT - AND EXPLOIT CHILD UNDER 13 YOA - F: F
S787.02 3a6 - KIDNAP-FALSE IMPRISONMENT - FALSE IMPRISON CHILD LT 13 YOA HUMAN TRAFFIC - F: F

Cases Citing Statute 787.02

Total Results: 115

United States v. Jesus Rosales-Bruno, 789 F.3d 1249

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 19, 2015 | Also: 2015 WL 3798129, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10346

Cited 545 times | Published

...battery offenses, and a dozen driving offenses including some DUIs. As Rosales- 5 In Rosales-Bruno I, we applied the “modified categorical approach” to determine that Rosales-Bruno’s false imprisonment conviction under Florida Statute § 787.02 was not a “crime of violence” for guidelines purposes....

James R. Brooks v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 283 F.3d 1268

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 1, 2002 | Also: 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3331, 2002 WL 331956

Cited 133 times | Published

..., and against whom a final deportation order issued after October 30, 1996. See Galindo-Del Valle v. Attorney General, 213 F.3d 594, 596 (11th Cir.2000). Thus this case falls squarely within the amended Act. 5 . Brooks was convicted under Fla. Stat. § 787.02 , False Imprisonment, which is a crime of violence....

Crain v. State, 894 So. 2d 59

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2004 | Also: 2004 WL 2404057

Cited 106 times | Published

...the lesser included offense. [18] False imprisonment does not require specific intent. See State v. Sanborn, 533 So.2d 1169, 1170 (Fla.1988) (concluding that the general intent of false imprisonment is included in the specific intent of kidnapping). Section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1997), provides in pertinent part: (1)(a) The term "false imprisonment" means forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against her or his will....

Guideone Elite Insurance v. Old Cutler Presbyterian Church, Inc., 420 F.3d 1317

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 19, 2005 | Also: 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17616, 2005 WL 2000183

Cited 75 times | Published

...The perpetrator committed robbery under section 812.13 when he demanded the Victim’s money and rings and when he took the money she had withdrawn from her bank accounts. The perpetrator falsely imprisoned the Victim and her children pursuant to section 787.01, and violated section 787.02 by kidnapping the children. We cannot say that the non-sexual acts were “connected” to the sexual acts such that the non-sexual acts would not have occurred “but for” the sexual misconduct....

The Florida Bar Re: Standard Jury Instructions Criminal Cases, 477 So. 2d 985

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1985 | Also: 10 Fla. L. Weekly 557, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3922

Cited 72 times | Published

...Read only if Confinement of a child under the age of confinement thirteen (13) is against his will if such is alleged confinement is without the consent of his and child parent or legal guardian. is under thirteen years of age. *998 FALSE IMPRISONMENT F.S. 787.02 Before you can find the defendant guilty of false imprisonment, the state must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: Elements 1....

United States v. Rosales-Bruno, 676 F.3d 1017

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 6, 2012 | Also: 2012 WL 1138648, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6983

Cited 57 times | Published

...In this appeal, Rosales- Bruno claims that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence based on its finding that his prior conviction for false imprisonment under Florida law qualified as a conviction for a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). See Fla. Stat. § 787.02 (defining “false imprisonment” as “forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against her or his will”). Rosales-Bruno contends that, becau...
...rce against the person of another.” Id. The meaning of “physical force” is a question of federal law, not state law. Palomino Garcia, 606 F.3d at 1331. But, in determining whether a conviction for false imprisonment under Fla. Stat. § 787.02 is a “crime of violence” for sentencing enhancement purposes, we are bound by Florida courts’ determination and construction of the substantive elements of that state offense....
...at 1269; see also Molinos Valle Del Cibao, C. por A. v. Lama, 633 F.3d 1330, 1348 (11th Cir. 2011) (affording Johnson deference to states’ intermediate 1 In Brooks v. Ashcroft, we stated in dicta that the defendant “was convicted under Fla. Stat. § 787.02, False Imprisonment, which is a crime of violence.” 283 F.3d 1268, 1273 n.5 (11th Cir....
...at 1272 (“[T]he term ‘physical force’ itself normally connotes force strong enough to constitute ‘power’—and all the more so when it is contained in a definition of ‘violent felony.’”). Against this backdrop, we look to Florida case law to determine whether a conviction under § 787.02 necessarily involves the employment of “physical force” as that term is defined by federal law. U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 cmt. n.1(B)(iii). Section 787.02 requires that “some amount of force” be used....
...(noting that the state must prove, among other things, that a “defendant forcibly restrained the victim against her will”). However, the force need not be “substantial.” Id. And, though that appears to be a fine distinction, case law since Proko makes clear that a § 787.02 offense can be committed without employing the type of “physical force” 6 contemplated in the Guidelines. Specifically, Florida jurisprudence indicates that “the statutory elements...
...3d 889, 891 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011) (stating that false imprisonment does not “necessarily involve[] an intentional, unlawful threat by word or act to do violence to another”); Davis v. State, 20 So. 3d 1024, 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009) (construing § 787.02 to permit false imprisonment to “be accomplished by physical force, but also in other ways” (emphasis added)); Mosquera v....
...d by the government—the information and judgment—were insufficient by themselves to support a finding that Rosales- Bruno’s conviction for false imprisonment was a “crime of violence.” Essentially, both documents recited the elements of § 787.02, an offense which we have already concluded is not categorically a “crime of violence.” The government urges us to read together all of the charges contained in the information and judgment to infer a “crime of violence.” W...
...Bruno “necessarily” committed a “crime of violence” by pleading guilty to false imprisonment under Florida law. See Shepard, 544 U.S. at 21, 125 S. Ct. at 1260. As a result of our conclusion that it was error to find Rosales-Bruno’s prior conviction under § 787.02 was a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. 2L1.2(b)(1)(A), we vacate Rosales-Bruno’s sentence....

Grant v. State, 390 So. 2d 341

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1980

Cited 47 times | Published

...s to remand to the trial court for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Effective October 1, 1975, Florida's false imprisonment statute was substantially revised. § 787.02, Fla....

Standard Jury Instructions, 723 So. 2d 123

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998

Cited 40 times | Published

...790.15 - 784.08(2)(d) Assault - 784.011 784.08(2)(c) Battery on person Battery - 784.03 Attempt 65 years of age or older 784.08(2)(d) Assault on person Assault - 784.011 Attempt 65 years of age or older 787.01 Kidnapping False Attempt imprisonment - 787.02 Aggravated assault - 784.021(1)(b) Battery - 784.03(1)(a) Assault - 784.011 787.02 False None Attempt imprisonment Battery - 784.03(1)(a) Assault - 784.011 790.01(1) Carrying concealed None Attempt weapons 790.01(2) Carrying concealed None Attempt firearms 790.06 Carrying pistol None Attempt or repeating rifle without first...
...elements of the charge have been proved. Note to This instruction should be given only if there is some evidence of Judge the defendant's lack of predisposition to commit the crime. See Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1993). FALSE IMPRISONMENT F.S. 787.02 Before you can find the defendant guilty of False Imprisonment, the State must prove the following threetwo elements beyond a reasonable doubt: Elements 1....

Fajardo v. U.S. Attorney General, 659 F.3d 1303

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 12, 2011 | Also: 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 20685, 2011 WL 4808171

Cited 34 times | Published

...inadmissible to the United States because he was “convicted of . . . a crime involving moral turpitude” under § 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), due to his conviction for false imprisonment under § 787.02, Florida Statutes. I....
...me involving moral turpitude. See Jaggernauth, 432 F.3d at 1355 (citing Matter of Short, 20 I. & N. Dec. 136, 139 (BIA 1989)). In this case, the count charging Sanchez Fajardo with false imprisonment merely tracked the general language of § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....

Mathis v. Coats, 24 So. 3d 1284

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2010 | Also: 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 43, 2010 WL 45857

Cited 34 times | Published

...Though not exacting in its details, the proposed amendment appears to assert a cause of action for false imprisonment. False arrest and false imprisonment are closely related, but false imprisonment is a broader common law tort; false arrest is only one of several methods of committing false imprisonment. See § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....

State v. Sanborn, 533 So. 2d 1169

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1988 | Also: 1988 WL 125260

Cited 21 times | Published

...Hold for ransom or reward or as a shield or hostage. 2. Commit or facilitate commission of any felony. 3. Inflict bodily harm upon or to terrorize the victim or another person. 4. Interfere with the performance of any governmental or political function. The pertinent parts of section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1987), concerning false imprisonment similarly provide: (1)(a) The term "false imprisonment" means forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against his will with any purpose other than those referred to in s....
...of the crime of kidnapping and require those instructions be given. See Fla.Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) at 260. Accord Cabe v. State, 408 So.2d 694 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), review denied, 435 So.2d 821 (Fla. 1983). A comparison of sections 787.01(1)(a) and 787.02(1)(a) reveals they are identical except for the question of intent. We find the general intent of section 787.02(1)(a)(false imprisonment) is included in the specific intent of section 787.01(1)(a)(kidnapping), consequently false imprisonment is a necessarily lesser included offense....

State v. Smith, 840 So. 2d 987

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 2003 | Also: 2003 WL 252117

Cited 12 times | Published

...nd the convictions in the instant case, robbery and false imprisonment. Although Smith did not object below to this error, the error is fundamental. Smith, 785 So.2d at 626 (citation omitted). The respondent was convicted of false imprisonment under section 787.02(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), and robbery under section 812.13, Florida Statutes (1997). Section 787.02(1)(a) defines false imprisonment as forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against her or his will....
...However, the rationale of Faison is that the conduct element of section 787.01(1)(a)—"confining, abducting, or imprisoning another person against his will"—must be limited to avoid a broad construction that would doubly criminalize the same conduct. Berry, 668 So.2d at 969. The false imprisonment statute, section 787.02(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), contains a conduct element similar to that of kidnapping; without any limitation it might apply in almost every forcible felony....
...United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), codified in section 775.021, reveals that the Double Jeopardy Clause is not violated because the statutory elements of false imprisonment are different from the elements of robbery. Compare § 787.02, Fla....
...False imprisonment is a separate offense from robbery. [3] This Court recognized the difference between the crimes of kidnapping and false imprisonment in State v. Sanborn, 533 So.2d 1169, 1170 (Fla.1988). A comparison of sections 787.01(1)(a) and 787.02(1)(a) reveals they are identical except for the question of intent. We find the general intent of section 787.02(1)(a) (false imprisonment) is included in the specific intent of section 787.01(1)(a) (kidnapping), consequently false imprisonment is a necessarily lesser included offense....

Proko v. State, 566 So. 2d 918

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1990 | Also: 1990 WL 130226

Cited 11 times | Published

...We find that the evidence of forcible restraint was sufficient to present a jury question on that issue and that the state was not required to allege or prove that the unlawful restraint was committed with specific intent. Appellant was convicted of violating section 787.02(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), which provides as follows: The term "false imprisonment" means forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against his will with any purpose other than those referred to in s....
...2d DCA 1983) (disputed facts on whether restraint or confinement occurred should have been presented to the jury); Jane v. State, 362 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) (holding victim in a bear hug was sufficient evidence of false imprisonment). On the issue of intent, there are conflicting interpretations of section 787.02(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989)....

Neal v. State, 854 So. 2d 666

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2003 | Also: 2003 WL 21359657

Cited 11 times | Published

...In the present case, Neal was convicted of two counts of false imprisonment. False imprisonment is defined as "forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against his will." § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....

Rohan v. State, 696 So. 2d 901

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1997 | Also: 1997 WL 361278

Cited 11 times | Published

...under section 810.02(2), Florida Statutes (1995)(first degree burglary), and battery under section 784.03, Florida Statutes (1995). For the Bloch episode, he was charged with battery, burglary with an assault or battery, and false imprisonment under section 787.02(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1995)....
...However, the rationale of Faison is that the conduct element of section 787.01(1)(a)—"confining, abducting, or imprisoning another person against his will"—must be limited to avoid a broad construction that would doubly criminalize the same conduct. Berry, 668 So.2d at 969. The false imprisonment statute, section 787.02(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), contains a conduct element similar to that of kidnapping; without any limitation it might apply in almost every forcible felony....

Setzer v. State, 575 So. 2d 747

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1991 | Also: 1991 WL 22979

Cited 11 times | Published

...his guilty plea. We conclude that the trial court erred in denying Setzer's motion to withdraw his guilty plea without holding an evidentiary hearing and, therefore, reverse. Appellant was charged with committing the offenses of false imprisonment, § 787.02, Fla....

Keller v. State, 586 So. 2d 1258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1991 | Also: 1991 WL 191586

Cited 10 times | Published

...Faison; Hrindich. REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial with instructions to the trial court to enter an order granting the judgment of acquittal on the charge of false imprisonment. COWART and HARRIS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] § 794.011(5), Fla. Stat. (1987). [2] § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....
...ted utterance (section 90.803(2)) exceptions to the hearsay rule. [5] We are aware that like Cooper, the other two witnesses testified prior to the victim, however no objection was made to their testimony. [6] § 787.01(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1987). [7] § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....

Dowling v. State, 723 So. 2d 307

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1998 | Also: 1998 WL 821753

Cited 10 times | Published

...State, 666 So.2d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). We agree with the state's main contention that the court did not err in instructing the jury, because the false imprisonment instruction it gave was complete and accurate in setting forth the elements of false imprisonment. Section 787.02, Florida Statute (1995) defines false imprisonment as follows: (1)(a) The term "false imprisonment" means forcibly by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining, another person without lawful authority and against his will....
...imprisonment" means forcibly by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining, another person without lawful authority and against his will with any purpose other than those referred to in s. 787.01. (emphasis supplied). See § 787.02, Fla.Stat....
...However, under the new version of the statute, it is no longer necessary for the state to prove, as an element of the crime of false imprisonment, that the defendant acted for a purpose other than any of the purposes listed in the kidnapping statute. Section 787.02, as amended, is purely a general intent statute with no requirement that the state prove a negative specific intent....

Raines v. State, 805 So. 2d 999

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2001 | Also: 2001 WL 1575734

Cited 10 times | Published

...Although he raises several constitutional arguments, we find merit only in his contention that the statute violates equal protection in classifying him as a "sexual offender," when he was not convicted of an offense involving any sexual component. In 1997 appellant pled no contest to a charge of false imprisonment under section 787.02, Florida Statutes....
...The original version described "sex offender" as a person who had been: convicted of committing, or attempting, soliciting, or conspiring to commit, any of the criminal offenses proscribed in the following statutes in this state or analogous offenses in another jurisdiction: s. 787.025 [luring or enticing a child], Chapter 794 [sexual battery], s....
...signated from a former statute number to one of those listed in this subparagraph. In 1998 the legislature amended section 943.0435(1)(a), modifying the definition of "sexual offender" to include kidnaping and false imprisonment, sections 787.01 and 787.02 respectively, where the victim is a minor and the defendant is not the victim's parent....
...Without question, the state has an interest in protecting the public from sexual offenders. Ch.2000-246, § 3 Laws of Fla. And the designation of a person as a sexual offender is rationally related to that goal where an accused has been convicted of false imprisonment under section 787.02(3)(a) 2., 3., or 4., which proscribes false imprisonment of a child under 13 when committed along with an enumerated sexual offense. However, where an accused is convicted of false imprisonment under sections 787.02(1)(a) and/or (b) and it is clear that the predicate crime is totally devoid of a sexual component, such rational basis is lost....
...der" means a person who has been: 1. Convicted of committing, or attempting, soliciting, or conspiring to commit, any of the criminal offenses proscribed in the following statutes in this state or similar offenses in another jurisdiction: s. 787.01, s. 787.02, or s. 787.025, where the victim is a minor and the defendant is not the victim's parent; chapter 794, excluding ss....
...794.011(10) and 794.0235; s. 796.03; s. 800.04; s. 825.1025; s. 827.071; s. 847.0133; s. 847.0135; s. 847.0145; or any similar offense committed in this state which has been redesignated from a former statute number to one of those listed in this subparagraph. [2] Section 787.02 provides: (1)(a) The term "false imprisonment" means forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against her or his will....

Johnson v. State, 637 So. 2d 3

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1994 | Also: 1994 WL 146542

Cited 9 times | Published

...We affirm the judgment of conviction for kidnapping Katrina, and the resulting sentence. Affirmed in part; reversed in part. NOTES [1] We note that the trial judge decided this case without having been apprised of Badalich as neither the state nor the defense cited it at trial. [2] Section 787.02, Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent part: "False imprisonment — ......

Brunelle v. State, 360 So. 2d 70

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1978

Cited 8 times | Published

...Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. This cause is before us on direct appeal from a final judgment of the Circuit Court of Orange County, inherently upholding the constitutionality of Section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1975)....
...We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution. Harrell's Candy Kitchen, Inc. v. Sarasota-Manatee Airport Authority, 111 So.2d 439 (Fla. 1959). Appellant was charged in a three count information with two counts of false imprisonment in violation of Section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1975), and one count of solicitation to commit prostitution or lewdness contrary to Section 796.07(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1975)....
...3.190(c)(4), alleging that there were no material disputed facts and the undisputed facts did not establish a prima facie case on any of the three counts. The final motion to dismiss filed by appellant was directed solely to the counts charging false imprisonment and alleged that Section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1975), is facially unconstitutional in that it is vague, indefinite and ambiguous. The trial court, following a hearing on the motions, entered an order denying all three motions, thus inherently upholding the constitutionality of Section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1975). The appellant thereafter pled nolo contendere to all three counts and was adjudicated guilty of each. On appeal, appellant assigns as error the trial court's denial of his motions to dismiss. Section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1975), provides: "(1)(a) `False imprisonment' means forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against his will with any purpose other than those referred to in § 787.01....
...[A] statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application violates the first essential of due process of law." From an examination of Section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1975), we hold that the wording of the statute is sufficiently explicit to inform those who are subject to its provisions what conduct on their part will render them liable to its penalties. More specifically, we find that subsection (1)(a) of Section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1975), is not "so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application." A reading of subsection (1)(a) clearly indicates that it is written in the disjunctive...

Chaeld v. State, 599 So. 2d 1362

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1992 | Also: 1992 WL 102437

Cited 8 times | Published

...n Faison v. State, 426 So.2d 963 (Fla. 1983). Concluding that Faison is inapplicable to the circumstances presented in this case, we affirm. The appellant was charged by information with false imprisonment and simple battery in violation of Sections 787.02 and 784.03, Florida Statutes....
...Hold for ransom or reward or as a shield or hostage. 2. Commit or facilitate commission of any felony. 3. Inflict bodily harm upon or to terrorize the victim or another person. 4. Interfere with the performance of any governmental or political function. Section 787.02(1)(a) defines false imprisonment in this manner: The term "false imprisonment" means forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against his will with any purpose other than those referred to in s....

Wilchcombe v. State, 842 So. 2d 198

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2003 | Also: 2003 WL 1563568

Cited 8 times | Published

....087(2)(a)(1)(g), Florida Statutes (2000); a consecutive 21 months for false imprisonment with a firearm (to commence after the 13 years of minimum mandatory sentences for aggravated assault with a firearm and aggravated battery with a firearm), per Section 787.02(2), Florida Statutes (2000), and 3 year sentences, both of which were suspended, on the two battery counts....

Perez v. State, 566 So. 2d 881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1990 | Also: 1990 WL 130232

Cited 7 times | Published

...Hold for ransom or reward or as a shield or hostage. 2. Commit or facilitate commission of any felony. 3. Inflict bodily harm upon or to terrorize the victim or another person. 4. Interfere with the performance of any governmental or political function. The false imprisonment statute, section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1987), provides, in part: (1)(a) The term "false imprisonment" means forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against his will with any purpose other than those referred to in s....

McCutcheon v. State, 711 So. 2d 1286

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1998 | Also: 1998 WL 263978

Cited 7 times | Published

...Sanborn, 533 So.2d 1169, 1170 (Fla.1988)(kidnapping and false imprisonment are identical except for the question of intent). Thus, proof of the elements of the kidnapping statute, under Sanborn, constitutes proof of the elements of false imprisonment. See Perez v. State, 566 So.2d 881, 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); § 787.02, Fla....
...e safe. The jury was free to believe this testimony (as it apparently did), and also to determine such detention of the victim went beyond acts incidental to the robbery. See Perez v. State 566 So.2d 881 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). I would affirm. NOTES [1] Section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1995) defines "false imprisonment" as "forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against her or his will."

Jane v. State, 362 So. 2d 1005

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1978

Cited 6 times | Published

...Regarding the charge of false imprisonment, appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of that crime because there was no proof of restraint by threat or in a secret manner. It is appellant's view that, since the statute defining false imprisonment, Section 787.02(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1977), provides: "`False imprisonment' means forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against his will with any purpose othe...
...nt must have been imposed by threat or in a secret manner. We reject appellant's contention upon authority of Brunelle v. State, 360 So.2d 70, Florida Supreme Court opinion filed May 26, 1978, wherein the court said: "A reading of subsection (1)(a) [787.021(1)(a)] clearly indicates that it is written in the disjunctive with adverbs `forcibly,' `threat' and `secretly' all being intended to modify the verbs `confining,' `abducting,' `imprisoning' and `restraining'....

Richardson v. State, 875 So. 2d 673

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2004 | Also: 2004 WL 1091140

Cited 6 times | Published

...False imprisonment is a lesser-included offense of kidnapping. "The term `false imprisonment' means forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against her or his will." § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....

Pierre v. State, 990 So. 2d 565

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2008 | Also: 2008 WL 2744243

Cited 6 times | Published

...We additionally conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support the defendant's conviction for false imprisonment based upon the victim's mother's testimony that she was ordered at gunpoint by one of the armed assailants to go to her bedroom. *572 See § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....

Shelby v. State, 541 So. 2d 1219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1989 | Also: 1989 WL 5247

Cited 6 times | Published

...The jury instruction delivered by the court read: Before you can find the Defendant guilty of False Imprisonment, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1. Defendant forcibly, secretly or by threat, restrained Pamela Tierney against her will. 2. Defendant had no lawful authority. Section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1985) requires, and the standard jury instruction on false imprisonment clearly delineates, a third element that distinguishes the crime of false imprisonment from the crime of kidnapping....
...This third element was crucial to the facts in the case against appellant because the evidence may support a finding by the jury that the perpetrator handcuffed the victim for the purpose of facilitating the sexual battery or other felony. As such, by the clear language of section 787.02 and the standard instruction, appellant could not be guilty of false imprisonment if the only purpose of the restraint was to commit or to facilitate the commission of a felony....

State v. Horton, 442 So. 2d 408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1983

Cited 6 times | Published

...A motion to dismiss under rule 3.190(c)(4) should be granted only where the most favorable construction to the state would not establish a prima facie case of guilt. State v. Smith, 348 So.2d 637, 638 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); State v. Swoveland, 413 So.2d 166 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Section 787.02(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), defines false imprisonment as "forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against his will with any purpose other than...

Gray v. State, 939 So. 2d 1095

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2006 | Also: 2006 WL 2612664

Cited 5 times | Published

...offense of false imprisonment. § 924.34, Fla. Stat. (2004). "False imprisonment" is defined as "forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against her or his will." § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....

Michaud v. State, 47 So. 3d 374

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2010 | Also: 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17181, 2010 WL 4536791

Cited 5 times | Published

...The other issues raised by Michaud are without merit. AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED. MONACO, C.J. and COHEN, J., concur. NOTES [1] § 784.045(1)(a)2, Fla. Stat. (2008). [2] §§ 784.021(1)(a) and 775.087(2)(a)1., Fla. Stat. (2008). [3] § 787.02, Fla....

Wood v. State, 593 So. 2d 557

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1992 | Also: 1992 WL 9646

Cited 5 times | Published

...Pursuant to the habitual offender statute, [1] the defendant was sentenced on one count (burglary of a dwelling while armed, § 810.02(2)(b), Fla. Stat.) to 60 years imprisonment. Consecutive to the 60 year sentence, the defendant was sentenced on two other counts (false imprisonment, § 787.02(2), Fla....

United States v. Isaac Seabrooks, 839 F.3d 1326

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 19, 2016 | Also: 2016 WL 6090860

Cited 4 times | Published

case law to determine whether a conviction under § 787.02 necessarily involves the employment of ‘physical

Cuevas v. State, 741 So. 2d 1234

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1999 | Also: 1999 WL 776086

Cited 4 times | Published

...NOTES [1] § 794.011(4), Fla. Stat. (1995). [2] § 794.023, Fla. Stat. (1995). [3] § 794.011(4); 777.011, Fla. Stat. (1995). [4] Mr. Cuevas has not challenged his judgment and sentence entered on count III, relating to the crime of false imprisonment, section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1995)....

State v. Badalich, 479 So. 2d 197

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1985 | Also: 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2576

Cited 4 times | Published

...risonment or interference with the lawful custody of that child. Count one of the state's amended information charged the appellee, Michael Badalich, with false imprisonment of Nancy Marie Badalich, a child under the age of thirteen, in violation of section 787.02, Florida Statutes (Supp....
...parentage. The trial court granted the motion and explained its rationale in a detailed order, which provides in pertinent part: ISSUES I. BASED ON THE FACTS OF THIS CASE, IS THERE A LEGAL BASIS TO CHARGE THE DEFENDANT WITH A VIOLATION OF FLA. STAT. 787.02, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, and FLA....
...The Court does not condone the behavior of the Defendant. The Court simply finds that the appropriate remedy is in the Civil Court and not in the Criminal Court. We have no problem in agreeing with the trial court's dismissal of the false imprisonment charge. This is so because section 787.02(1)(b) clearly requires that the confinement contemplated by this charge must be without the consent of the child's "parent or legal guardian." (Emphasis added.) It does not say both parents must consent....
...Therefore, the lower court erred in dismissing count two of the state's amended information which charged the appellee with the misdemeanor offense of interference with custody. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. UPCHURCH and COWART, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 787.02, Florida Statutes, reads as follows: False imprisonment....

State v. Johnson, 398 So. 2d 500

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1981

Cited 4 times | Published

...Brummer, Public Defender and Stuart Gitlitz, Special Asst. Public Defender, for appellee. Before HENDRY, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ. PER CURIAM. The state appeals from an order of the trial court dismissing an information filed against the defendant which charged him with false imprisonment in violation of section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1979)....

Andre v. State, 13 So. 3d 103

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2009 | Also: 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5444, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1010

Cited 4 times | Published

...inement of the child was without the consent of her parent or legal guardian. We find no merit to Defendant's other arguments and affirm his convictions on the following charges: (1) luring or enticing a child under the age of twelve in violation of section 787.025, Florida Statutes (2006); (2) child abuse in violation of section 827.03(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2006); and (3) lewd or lascivious molestation—offender eighteen or older, victim twelve or younger in violation of section 800.04(5)(b), Florida Statutes (2006)....
...ission of the crime."); see, e.g., Alvarez v. State, 963 So.2d 757, 764-65 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (holding it was fundamental error to convict the defendant of the crime of carjacking when the victim was unaware of the theft—an element of the offense). Section 787.02(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2006) defines false imprisonment as "forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against her or his will." If the confinement is of a child under age thirteen, then it is against her or his will if it is "without the consent of her or his parent or legal guardian." Section 787.02(b), Fla....
...reated relationship between the child and caregiver which is intended to be permanent and self-sustaining and is provided pursuant to the procedures in chapter 744.'" Our analysis of the issue and the result reached are constrained by the wording of section 787.02(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2006)....
...ll. Because the State failed to prove an essential element of the crime, it was fundamental error to convict Defendant of aggravated false imprisonment. Accordingly, we reverse Defendant's conviction for aggravated false imprisonment in violation of section 787.02(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2006)....

Lindsey v. State, 416 So. 2d 471

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1982

Cited 4 times | Published

...Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee. BERANEK, Judge. Defendants were convicted of (1) burglary of a dwelling with intent to commit robbery and in the course thereof committing an assault, (2) robbery with a dangerous weapon, and (3) false imprisonment under Section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1977)....

Cabe v. State, 408 So. 2d 694

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1982

Cited 4 times | Published

...Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Appellant seeks review of a judgment of conviction and sentence based upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of the crime of false imprisonment. See Section 787.02, Fla....

TB v. State, 732 So. 2d 1163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1999 | Also: 1999 WL 219331

Cited 4 times | Published

...4th DCA 1996) (order committing juvenile to Level 8 program for indeterminate period of time was improper and should have specified a commitment for one year, the maximum allowable sentence for his misdemeanor). The pertinent statute governing false imprisonment states: 787.02 False imprisonment; false imprisonment of child under age 13, aggravating circumstances.— (1)(a) The term "false imprisonment" means forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against her or his will § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....
...t of forcibly confining or restraining the victim without lawful authority and against her will. Pursuant to section 777.011, Florida Statutes (1997), T.B.'s acts constitute aiding and abetting the commission of the crime of false imprisonment under section 787.02(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1997)....
...; Jones v. State, 648 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). The parties agree that the written juvenile disposition order must be corrected. [1] False imprisonment is a third-degree felony "punishable by a term of imprisonment not exceeding five years." §§ 787.02(2) & 775.082(3)(d), Fla....

KJF v. State, 44 So. 3d 1204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2010 | Also: 2010 WL 3783340

Cited 3 times | Published

...da Statutes (2008); lewd or lascivious molestation, in violation of section 800.04(5)(c)1, Florida Statutes (2008); lewd or lascivious exhibition, in violation of section 800.04(7)(c), Florida Statutes (2008); and false imprisonment, in violation of section 787.02(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2008)....

Van Gotum v. State, 569 So. 2d 773

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1990 | Also: 1990 WL 145589

Cited 3 times | Published

...nt to commit the felony *776 of grand theft. [3] It is entirely possible that the defendant had no intent to steal his victim's car when he first bound and gagged her. Arguably, the offense may have been only false imprisonment at its inception. See § 787.02, Fla....

Munroe v. State, 28 So. 3d 973

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 2010 | Also: 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2519, 2010 WL 711855

Cited 3 times | Published

...On August 28, 2008, Munroe pleaded no contest to failure to register as a sexual offender in the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Pasco County. See § 943.0435(9), Fla. Stat. (2007). He was designated a sexual offender because he had been convicted of false imprisonment in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County. See § 787.02, Fla....
...graph d., as follows: a.(I) Has been convicted of committing, or attempting, soliciting, or conspiring to commit, any of the criminal offenses proscribed in the following statutes in this state or similar offenses in another jurisdiction: s. 787.01, s. 787.02, or s. 787.025(2)(c), where the victim is a minor and the defendant is not the victim's parent or guardian; s....

State v. Graham, 468 So. 2d 270

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1985 | Also: 10 Fla. L. Weekly 551

Cited 3 times | Published

...Graham, III, with the offense of false imprisonment. We reverse. The state filed an information which alleged in pertinent part that appellee did forcibly, by threat, or secretly confine, abduct, imprison, or restrain one Sharon Gray *271 against her will. The information also set forth section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1983), as the applicable statute number....
...The trial court granted appellee's motion to dismiss the information on the ground that false imprisonment is a specific intent crime and the information failed to allege the purpose for which the crime had been committed. The false imprisonment statute provides in part as follows: 787.02 False imprisonment....

Rojas v. State, 535 So. 2d 674

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1988 | Also: 1988 WL 135843

Cited 3 times | Published

...le. We realize this opinion is in conflict with Walker, supra ; Spaziano, supra (as modified by Tobey ). AFFIRMED. COBB and COWART, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] § 782.04(2), Fla. Stat. (1985). Rojas was also convicted of two counts of false imprisonment. § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....

Carl Selph v. Decirena Selph, 144 So. 3d 676

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2014 | Also: 2014 WL 3928415, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12425

Cited 3 times | Published

...cannot conclude that the evidence supports a finding that the husband “forcibly, by threat, or secretly confin[ed], abduct[ed], imprison[ed], or 2 restrain[ed his wife] without lawful authority and against her . . . will.” § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....

Blanchard v. State, 634 So. 2d 1118

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1994 | Also: 1994 WL 114698

Cited 3 times | Published

...ty on the battery charge is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to vacate the judgment and sentence on the battery charge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part, with directions. SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., concur. NOTES [1] Section 787.02(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1991), provides: `False imprisonment' means forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against his will with any purpose other than those referred to in § 787.01....

Davis v. State, 20 So. 3d 1024

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2009 | Also: 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16843, 2009 WL 3763052

Cited 2 times | Published

...tory elements of the offense); Sinclair v. State, 973 So.2d 665, 665 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (reversing sentence and remanding for resentencing because false imprisonment is not enumerated in subsection 775.082(9)(a)1., Florida Statutes (2004)); see also § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....

Bretherick v. State, 135 So. 3d 337

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2013 | Also: 2013 WL 5849486, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17324

Cited 2 times | Published

lawful authority and against her or his will.” § 787.02(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011). The trial court correctly

Davis v. State, 816 So. 2d 840

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2002 | Also: 2002 WL 1049726

Cited 2 times | Published

...State, 785 So.2d 623 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), review granted, 807 So.2d 655 (Fla.2002), and Perez v. State, 566 So.2d 881 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), argues that he did not commit the offense of false imprisonment, because the victim was never confined or restrained, as required by section 787.02(1), Florida Statutes (1999), [1] and under Faison v....
...Until 1993, the statute was the same as the current version quoted in footnote 1, but it included at the end of the provision this additional language: "with any purpose other than those referred to in s. 787.01," which is the kidnaping statute. Accordingly, section 787.02(1) expressly excluded the offense of confinement with intent to commit a felony under the kidnaping statute set out in section 787.01, which was the provision the court was construing in Faison....
...Nonetheless, we are not required to decide whether the Faison test is applicable because, as in Perez, appellant's conviction is sustainable even under the stringent Faison analysis. AFFIRMED. ERVIN, BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] In proscribing false imprisonment, section 787.02(1) provides: "The term `false imprisonment' means forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against her or his will." [2] § 787.01(1)(a)(2), Fla....

Thompson v. State, 558 So. 2d 111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1990 | Also: 1990 WL 20686

Cited 2 times | Published

...We observe, however, that the guidelines scoresheet for the defendant recommended a sentencing range of 17 to 22 years. Defendant was convicted of two third degree felonies, each of which ordinarily carries a five year penalty. See §§ 794.011(5) & 777.04(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1987) (attempted sexual battery); Id. § 787.02 (false imprisonment)....

Seavey v. State, 57 So. 3d 978

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2011 | Also: 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4661, 2011 WL 1195798

Cited 2 times | Published

...To establish the crime of false imprisonment, the state is required to prove two elements beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) the defendant forcibly, secretly, or by threat confined, abducted, imprisoned or restrained the victim against his or her will; and (2) the defendant had no lawful authority to do so. § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....

In RE: AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE-2018 REGULAR-CYCLE REPORT., 265 So. 3d 494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2018

Cited 1 times | Published

a sexual battery or lewd act); c. section 787.02(3)(a)2. or (3)(a)3., Florida Statutes, (false

Stanley v. State, 112 So. 3d 718

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2013 | Also: 2013 WL 1891325, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7349

Cited 1 times | Published

imprisonment. The evidence supports the lesser crime. See § 787.02(l)(a) (defining false imprisonment as “forcibly

Juarez v. State, 65 So. 3d 110

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2011 | Also: 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10179, 2011 WL 2555402

Cited 1 times | Published

...The Supreme Court's construction of section 775.087(1) in State v. Rodriguez, 602 So.2d 1270 (Fla.1992), compels reversal. Grand theft and false imprisonment are typically charged as third-degree felonies. See § 812.014(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2008) (grand theft); § 787.02(2), Fla....
...4th DCA 2011). Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded. HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] §§ 775.082(2)(a)1., 812.13(1), (2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008). [2] §§ 775.087(1), 812.014(1), (2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2008). [3] §§ 775.087(1), 787.02(2), Fla....

Denmark v. Lee County, 931 F. Supp. 831

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1996 | Also: 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9344, 1996 WL 380629

Cited 1 times | Published

...Plaintiff was, therefore, found to have resisted, obstructed or opposed Defendant Schramm in the lawful execution of Defendant Schramm's legal duty. Because resisting a police officer is unlawful conduct, such conduct provides probable cause for an arrest. Additionally, pursuant to § 787.02, Fla.Stat....

In Re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Report No. 2016-08, 211 So. 3d 995

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2017

Cited 1 times | Published

443] , and 2017. 9.2 FALSE IMPRISONMENT § 787.02, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of False Imprisonment

Champagne v. State, 269 So. 3d 629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019

Cited 1 times | Published

false imprisonment, a third-degree felony, see § 787.02(2), Fla. Stat. (2005). A CPC scoresheet was prepared

Nutter v. State, 679 So. 2d 1245

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1996 | Also: 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9345, 1996 WL 502114

Published

this crime are as follows. FALSE IMPRISONMENT F.S. 787.02 Before you can find the defendant guilty of False

K.J.F. v. State, 44 So. 3d 1204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2010 | Also: 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14532

Published

(2008); and false imprisonment, in violation of section 787.02(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2008). The trial court

In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES—REPORT NO. 2014-02, 152 So. 3d 475

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 2014 | Also: 2014 WL 4458879

Published

...e. Some of the more significant changes to the standard jury instructions are as follows. With respect to instructions 9.1 and 9.2, amongst other changes, the instructions are amended to include the enhancement in sections 787.01(3)(a) and 787.02(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2013), respectively, which enhances the offense of kidnapping or false imprisonment from a first-degree felony punishable by life to a life felony if the victim was less than thirteen years of age and the defendant...
...-6- Lesser Included Offenses KIDNAPPING — 787.01 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. False imprisonment 787.02 9.2 Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Aggravated assault 784.021 8.2 Battery 784.03 8.3...
...kidnapping his or her own child. See Davila v. State, 75 So. 3d 192 (Fla. 2011). This instruction was adopted in 1981 and amended in 1985 [477 So. 2d 985] and 2014. 9.2 FALSE IMPRISONMENT § 787.02, Fla._Stat. To prove the crime of False Imprisonment, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1....
...ild victim is under 13 years of age. Confinement of a child under the age of 13 is against [his] [her] the child’s will if such confinement is without the consent of [his] [her] the child’s parent or legal guardian. If a violation of § 787.02(3), Fla....
...a Prostitute upon (victim)] [an Exploitation of a Child upon (victim)]. Define applicable felony unless included in other instructions. Lesser Included Offenses FALSE IMPRISONMENT — 787.02 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA....

Hernandez v. State, 98 So. 3d 702

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2012 | Also: 2012 WL 4738862, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16943

Published

nolle prossed by the State. • • . Pursuant to section 787.02(2), Florida Statutes (2008), false imprisonment

Cromer v. State, 514 So. 2d 416

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1987 | Also: 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2477, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10803

Published

guilty to false imprisonment in violation of section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1985). The state alleged

Moore v. State, 967 So. 2d 991

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2007 | Also: 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16851, 2007 WL 3118865

Published

false imprisonment and molestation charges. Section 787.02(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2005), defines “false

Conner v. State, 19 So. 3d 1117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2009 | Also: 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15523, 2009 WL 3270832

Published

lawful authority and against her or his will.” § 787.02(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004) (emphasis added). In

Vitiello v. State, 609 So. 2d 111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1992 | Also: 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11781, 1992 WL 341952

Published

of the seriousness of other sentences. . Section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1991). . Eutsey v. State

State v. Sanborn, 533 So. 2d 1147

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1988

Published

political function. The pertinent parts of section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1987), concerning false

Davis v. State, 230 So. 3d 948

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2017

Published

(2013), false imprisonment, in violation of section 787.02, Florida Statutes (2013), and stalking, in

Casillas v. State, 405 So. 2d 1058

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1981 | Also: 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28155

Published

State, 332 So.2d 351 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970); Section 787.02(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1977); Rule 3.190

Gallagher v. State, 542 So. 2d 478

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1989 | Also: 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1117, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2384, 1989 WL 45352

Published

offense, which therefore is a third degree felony. § 787.02(2), Fla. Stat. (1987). Because appellant was also

United States v. Carl Schneider, 681 F.3d 1273

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 24, 2012 | Also: 2012 WL 1868645

Published

...but the timing 4 suggests that it may have been the 1982 armed robbery and kidnapping. His judgment says he pleaded nolo contendere to “the lesser included offense of false imprisonment,” Fla. Stat. 787.02(1)(a), a third degree felony....
...Sworn statements were obtained from the victims. 2 “The term ‘false imprisonment’ means forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against her or his will.” Fla. Stat. § 787.02(1)(a) (emphasis added). 6 assuming that the fifteen-year mandatory minimum under the Armed Career Criminal Act did not apply....
...or his will.”6 It is a third degree felony punishable by up to five years of 5 United States v. Bennett, 472 F.3d 825, 832 (11th Cir. 2006) (“[C]hallenges to the facts contained in the PSI must be asserted with specificity and clarity.”). 6 Fla. Stat. § 787.02(1)(a). 10 imprisonment.7 False imprisonment is a lesser included offense of kidnapping,8 which is a first degree felony punishable by life imprisonment.9 Kidnapping differs in that it requi...
...fifteen years for certain violations of what is colloquially called “felon in possession.” Generally, possession of a firearm by someone previously convicted of a felony, or subject to certain other disqualifiers, is itself a felony.11 If the felon 7 Fla. Stat. §§ 787.02(2), 775.082(3)(d). 8 State v....
...restrain[] another person without lawful authority and against her or his will.”51 The Begay inquiry into whether the crime is “purposeful, violent, and aggressive” therefore does not, under Sykes and Chitwood, apply. AFFIRMED. 51 Fla. Stat. § 787.02(1)(a); see also State v....

Sperow v. State, 781 So. 2d 410

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2000 | Also: 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6178, 2000 WL 668542

Published

and armed kidnapping (a life felony under section 787.02(2), Florida Statutes (1997)). Pursuant to the

Berry v. State, 652 So. 2d 836

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1995 | Also: 1994 WL 706304

Published

...Commit or facilitate commission of any felony. 3. Inflict bodily harm upon or to terrorize the victim or another person. 4. Interfere with the performance of any governmental or political function." [2] The legislature has also created the crime of false imprisonment. See § 787.02, Fla....

Pickett v. State, 109 So. 3d 841

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2013 | Also: 2013 WL 811642, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3494

Published

State, 37 So.3d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). . Section 787.02 provides in relevant part: (1)(a) The term

Billias v. State, 924 So. 2d 917

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2006 | Also: 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4225, 2006 WL 733974

Published

convicted of false imprisonment in violation of section 787.02(1), Florida Statutes (also a third-degree felony

KELLY PETERSON MILLIEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2022

Published

a violation of either section 787.01(2) or section 787.02(2), Florida Statutes, and a violation of one

Knott v. State, 198 So. 3d 768

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2016 | Also: 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3029, 2016 WL 801143

Published

offense of false imprisonment. See § 787.02(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011); see also State

Scott v. State, 710 So. 2d 60

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Also: 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2656, 1998 WL 191800

Published

the jury on false imprisonment. Even though section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1997), entitled “False Imprisonment

Graham v. State, 169 So. 3d 123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2015 | Also: 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3400, 2015 WL 1044221

Published

...to an order of a state agency or court. The kidnapping statute under which Geralyn Graham was charged, section 787.01(1)(a)4., more appropriately encompasses the totality and gravity of Geralyn Graham’s felonious conduct than the crimes defined in sections 787.02 (false imprisonment), 787.03 (interference with custody), and 787.04 (removal of child from state). A false imprisonment under section 787.02 does not necessarily interfere with the performance of a governmental function. Interference with custody (section 787.03) or removal from the state (section 787.04) are not necessarily forcible, secret, by threat, or against the will of the child....
...a Statutes9; the history and source of the 9 See and compare § 787.01, Fla. Stat. (Kidnapping) (a first-degree felony punishable by life imprisonment, and requires proof of at least one of the four aggravating circumstances of intent or purpose); § 787.02 (False Imprisonment) (a third-degree felony, proscribing the same conduct as kidnapping but without any of 18 legislation10; the intent and meaning of this language as expressed by the originating...

Denmark v. State, 604 So. 2d 845

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1992 | Also: 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6794, 1992 WL 143634

Published

State, 541 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); see also § 787.02(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1989). Taking the victim’s

Deal v. State, 359 So. 2d 43

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1978 | Also: 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15743

Published

jury that conspiracy to falsely imprison under Section 787.02(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1975), is a lesser-included

United States v. Jesus Rosales-Bruno

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 19, 2015

Published

...battery offenses, and a dozen driving offenses including some DUIs. As Rosales- 5 In Rosales-Bruno I, we applied the “modified categorical approach” to determine that Rosales-Bruno’s false imprisonment conviction under Florida Statute § 787.02 was not a “crime of violence” for guidelines purposes....

In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Instructions 9.1 & 9.2, 167 So. 3d 443

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2015

Published

787.01(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2014), and section 787.02(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2014). In re: Std

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Instructions 9.1 And 9.2, 167 So. 3d 443

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2015 | Also: 2015 WL 3775613

Published

...Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (Committee), the Court authorized for publication and use amendments to instructions 9.1 (Kidnapping) and 9.2 (False Imprisonment) in response to recent amendments to section 787.01(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2014), and section 787.02(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2014)....
...-5- Lesser Included Offenses KIDNAPPING — 787.01 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. False imprisonment 787.02 9.2 Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Aggravated assault 784.021 8.2 Battery 784.03 8.3...
...kidnapping his or her own child. See Davila v. State, 75 So. 3d 192 (Fla. 2011). This instruction was adopted in 1981 and amended in 1985 [477 So. 2d 985], 2014 [152 So. 3d 475], and 2015. 9.2 FALSE IMPRISONMENT § 787.02, Fla....
... Read only if confinement is alleged and victim is under 13 years of age. Confinement of a child under the age of 13 is against the child’s will if such confinement is without the consent of the child’s parent or legal guardian. If a violation of § 787.02(3), Fla....
...[or] [a Mentally Incapacitated Person] was Involved]. Define applicable felony unless included in other instructions. -7- Lesser Included Offenses FALSE IMPRISONMENT — 787.02 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA....

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - 2018 Regular-Cycle Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2018

Published

act); c. section 787.02(3)(a)2. or (3)(a)3., Florida Statutes, (false

Denis v. State, 994 So. 2d 1152

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2008 | Also: 2008 WL 2744237

Published

...or she is or is not actually or constructively present at the commission of such offense."); § 777.04(1), Fla. Stat. (2004) (defining criminal attempt); § 782.04(1)(a)1., Fla. Stat. (2004) (detailing elements of first degree premeditated murder); § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....

Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (97-2), 723 So. 2d 123

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Also: 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 407, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1332, 1998 WL 394912

Published

629 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1993). FALSE IMPRISONMENT F.S. 787.02 Before you can find the defendant guilty of False

Underwood v. State, 985 So. 2d 705

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2008 | Also: 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10529, 2008 WL 2695873

Published

(2005), and false imprisonment in violation of section 787.02(1), (2), Florida Statutes (2005). We affirm

In Re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Instructions 9.1 & 9.2, 156 So. 3d 495

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 2015 | Also: 2015 WL 263927

Published

...ions.1 We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. The Committee proposes amending instruction 9.1 (Kidnapping) and 9.2 (False Imprisonment), in response to recent amendments to section 787.01(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2014), and 787.02(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2014)....
...-6- Lesser Included Offenses KIDNAPPING — 787.01 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. False imprisonment 787.02 9.2 Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Aggravated assault 784.021 8.2 Battery 784.03 8.3...
...kidnapping his or her own child. See Davila v. State, 75 So. 3d 192 (Fla. 2011). This instruction was adopted in 1981 and amended in 1985 [477 So. 2d 985], 2014, and 20145. 9.2 FALSE IMPRISONMENT § 787.02, Fla._Stat. To prove the crime of False Imprisonment, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1....
...Read only if confinement is alleged and victim is under 13 years of age. Confinement of a child under the age of 13 is against the child’s will if such confinement is without the consent of the child’s parent or legal guardian. If a violation of § 787.02(3), Fla....
...[or] [a Mentally Incapacitated Person] was Involved]. Define applicable felony unless included in other instructions. -8- Lesser Included Offenses FALSE IMPRISONMENT — 787.02 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA....

Hrindich v. State, 427 So. 2d 212

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1983 | Also: 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19111

Published

ORFINGER, C.J., and COWART, J., concur. .Section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1981), dealing with the

Poe v. State, 689 So. 2d 333

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1997 | Also: 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1231, 1997 WL 47276

Published

(2)(c), 775.0845, 787.01, Fla. Stat. (1993). . § 787.02, Fla. Stat. (1993).

Darrell Von Young v. State of Florida, 266 So. 3d 1225

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2019

Published

and without her consent was false imprisonment. § 787.02(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (defining false imprisonment

State v. Waits, 848 So. 2d 1030

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2003 | Also: 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 139, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 174, 2003 WL 297154

Published

of both battery and aggravated assault. Compare § 787.02, Fla. Stat. (1997), with §§ 784.021, -.03, Fla

Lightsey v. State, 630 So. 2d 686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1994 | Also: 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 422, 1994 WL 26905

Published

was adjudicated guilty of a third degree felony. § 787.02(2), Fla.Stat. (1991). Affirmed.

Cole v. State, 942 So. 2d 1010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2006 | Also: 2006 WL 3498318

Published

...It was the type of movement that was likely to naturally accompany a robbery, and the "confinement" ceased naturally with the robbery. Thus, the State's evidence was legally insufficient to support the kidnapping charge. That said, however, the evidence presented was sufficient to support a conviction for false imprisonment. Section 787.02(1)(a) defines false imprisonment as "forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against her or his will." The Faison test does not apply to the offense of false imprisonment....

Cardona v. State, 835 So. 2d 297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2002 | Also: 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18700, 2002 WL 31840701

Published

scene, near the time the crime was committed. . § 787.02(2); § 790.10; and § 800.03, Fla. Stat. (2001)

Leeks v. State, 353 So. 2d 607

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1977 | Also: 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16905

Published

imposition of a proper sentence pursuant to Section 787.02, Florida Statutes (1975), which was in effect

Espinoza-Montes v. State, 113 So. 3d 847

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2011 | Also: 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20062, 2011 WL 6265580

Published

third-degree felony of false imprisonment under section 787.02(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2008). The information

Joseph v. State, 771 So. 2d 1293

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2000 | Also: 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16197, 2000 WL 1816705

Published

ranked in level 8, 9 or 10. False imprisonment, § 787.02(l)(a) Florida. Statutes, however, is a level 6

Tabarius Arline v. State, 155 So. 3d 1158

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2014 | Also: 2014 WL 3843075, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12026

Published

...a prior battery conviction, in violation of section 784.03(2), Florida Statutes (2012) – Five years as a prison releasee reoffender (PRR); and Count Two, the third degree felony of false imprisonment, in violation of section 787.02(2), Florida Statutes (2012) – Five years and a day as a habitual felony offender (HFO). The court orally pronounced appellant’s sentences consistent with the plea agreement....

Christopher J. Mars v. State of Florida, 251 So. 3d 339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2018

Published

also convicted of false imprisonment under section 787.02, Florida Statutes. At trial, based on testimony

Gerlo Ulysse v. State of Florida, 174 So. 3d 464

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2015 | Also: 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11957, 2015 WL 4747361

Published

...hat context either. Under Florida law, the term “false imprisonment” is defined as “forcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining another person without lawful authority and against her or his will.” § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....

Gloster v. State, 603 So. 2d 1344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1992 | Also: 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8801, 1992 WL 192992

Published

counts of false imprisonment in violation of section 787.02(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1989). This section

Raulerson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2025

Published

the felony offense of false imprisonment. See § 787.02(1), Fla. Stat. (2019) (“The term ‘false imprisonment’

Scott v. State, 757 So. 2d 574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2000 | Also: 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4783, 2000 WL 485123

Published

than those listed in the kidnapping statute. See § 787.02, Fla. Stat. (1991). The kidnapping statute included

Champagne v. State, 269 So. 3d 629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019

Published

false imprisonment, a third-degree felony, see § 787.02(2), Fla. Stat. (2005). A CPC scoresheet was prepared

RENALDO CHAMPAGNE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019

Published

false imprisonment, a third-degree felony, see § 787.02(2), Fla. Stat. (2005). A CPC scoresheet was prepared

Dorsey v. State, 467 So. 2d 1075

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1985 | Also: 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1073, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13669

Published

to reflect the appropriate section number, section 787.02. If not, the trial court may again summarily

Oakes v. State, 85 So. 3d 526

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2012 | Also: 2012 WL 1071501, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5008

Published

...Appellant then pinned her to the ground by placing his knees on her shoulders, and repeatedly hit her in the head and choked her. False imprisonment is defined as: [F]orcibly, by threat, or secretly confining, abducting, imprisoning, or restraining *527 another person without lawful authority and against her or his will. § 787.02(1)(a), Fla....

T.B. v. State, 732 So. 2d 1163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1999 | Also: 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5003

Published

without lawful authority and against her or his will § 787.02(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). We have explained in

Addison v. State, 653 So. 2d 482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1995 | Also: 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3703, 1995 WL 214608

Published

Stat. (1991). . § 810.02, Fla.Stat. (1991). . § 787.02, Fla.Stat. (1991). . § 784.03, Fla.Stat. (1991)

Bradsher v. State, 841 So. 2d 679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2003 | Also: 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4906, 2003 WL 1855419

Published

THOMPSON, C.J., and ORFINGER, J., concur. . § 787.02(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). . § 784.021, Fla.

Stringer v. State, 783 So. 2d 1153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2001 | Also: 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4719, 2001 WL 356454

Published

another person ... against his [or her] will.” § 787.02, Fla. Stat. (1995). In affirming, we have considered

State v. Brown, 466 So. 2d 1223

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1985 | Also: 10 Fla. L. Weekly 961, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13419

Published

offense of false imprisonment in violation of section 787.02, Florida Statutes. The trial court dismissed

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.