The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVI
CRIMES

Chapter 828
ANIMALS: CRUELTY; SALES; ANIMAL ENTERPRISE PROTECTION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 828.25

828.25 Administration; rules; inspection; fees.—

(1) The department shall administer the provisions of ss. 828.22-828.26. It shall adopt and may from time to time revise rules, which rules must conform substantially to and must not be less restrictive than the rules and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States pursuant to the federal Humane Methods of Slaughter Act of 1958, Pub. L. No. 85-765, 72 Stat. 862, and any amendments thereto.

(2) The department may appoint any member of its staff as an official inspector for the purposes of ss. 828.22-828.26. Such inspector shall have the power to enter the premises of any slaughterer for the purposes of verifying compliance or noncompliance with the provisions of ss. 828.22-828.26.

(3) The department has the authority to conduct inspections of the premises of slaughterers at random intervals.

History.—s. 1, ch. 61-254; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 40, ch. 2001-279; s. 92, ch. 2009-21.

F.S. 828.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 828.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 828.25

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 828.25

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 828.25.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

J. CLEARY, CLEARY v. WALDMAN,, 167 F.3d 801 (3d Cir. 1999)

. . . Cleary’s total monthly income was $828.25 ($516.50 in social security payment and $311.75 in interest . . .

In CASCADE OIL COMPANY, INC., 126 B.R. 99 (D. Kan. 1991)

. . . Adding the fee application of $209,-828.25 to the fee request for preparing the application of $2,295.00 . . .

E. CLEMENS HORST CO. v. OESTE, 114 F. Supp. 408 (N.D. Cal. 1953)

. . . proximate result of the infringing acts of the defendant, the plaintiff has been damaged in the amount ■of $828.25 . . . The plaintiff demands “general damages” in the amount of $828.25, or, as an alternative, judgment for . . .