Syfert Injury Law Firm

216 provides an instruction on bookmaking. Section 849.25, Florida Statutes, was amended by Chapter 87-243

Florida Statutes § 849.14; and Florida Statutes § 849.25 all carry maximum sentences of less than one year

(1988). [4] § 895.03, Fla. Stat. (1983). [5] § 849.25, Fla. Stat. (1983). [6] Shaktman v. State, 433

commit the offenses denounced by § 849.01 and § 849.25. Where the information in a criminal case identifies

bookmaking; and bookmaking in violation of section 849.25, Florida Statutes (1983). The charges were

informations in this case on the ground that Section 849.25(3), Florida Statutes (1975), is unconstitutionally

with three (3) or more persons, contrary to Section 849.25(3), Florida Statutes, in such case made and

1987), in which the district court held that section 849.25, Florida Statutes (1985), dealing with bookmaking

convicted of "bookmaking" in violation of Fla. Stat. § 849.25, F.S.A., which provides: * * * * * * (1) As used

constitutionality of Florida's "bookmaking" statute, Section 849.25(1), Florida Statutes (1975), on the ground

1988), in which the defendant contended that section 849.25[4] (bookmaking) was unconstitutional as violative

note our agreement with the trial court that section 849.25, Florida Statutes (1985) is constitutionally

defendants with bookmaking, a felony proscribed by section 849.25, Florida Statutes (1979). The state filed an

unknown, or contingent event whatsoever. See § 849.25(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). The bookmaking statute

remand for further proceedings in accord with section 849.25(2), Florida Statutes (1985). See Charatz v

under which appellant was originally charged, section 849.-25(2), prohibits the withholding of adjudication

filed answer briefs. There it was held that section 849.-25, Florida Statutes (1985), which gives a prosecutor

State v. Cogswell, 521 So.2d 1081, (Fla.1988) (section 849.25, Florida Statutes (1985), the bookmaking statute

charged under the felony bookmaking statute, Section 849.25(1), which forbids the “taking or receiving

appellant on the basis that the bookmaking statute, section 849.25, Florida Statutes (1985), was unconstitutional

with two counts of bookmaking, in violation of section 849.25, Florida Statutes (1985). He pleaded nolo contendere

RICO conviction were bookmaking, violations of section 849.25. Under the analysis set forth in Rotenberry

the lodge so as to make out a violation of Section 849.25(1), Florida Statutes (1981). For similar reasons

four counts of bookmaking in violation of section 849.-25(1), Florida Statutes (1981). Appellee was charged

judgment holding that the “bookmaking” statute, section 849.25, Florida Statutes (1981), is unconstitutional

arguing that the lower court erred in finding section 849.25, Florida Statutes (1981), to be unconstitutional

judgment holding that the "bookmaking" statute, section 849.25, Florida Statutes (1981), is unconstitutional

information basically tracked the statute. Section 849.25(2), Florida Statutes (1981) provides, “Any

with 14 counts of bookmaking in violation of Section 849-25(1), (2), Florida Statutes (1979). The statute

under chapter 849, Florida Statutes (1979), section 849.25(5) excepts pari-mutuel wagering in Florida

engaging in common bookmaking schemes contrary to Section 849.25(3), Florida Statutes (1975). We affirm in part

judgments and sentences appealed. Affirmed. . Section 849.25, Florida Statutes (1977). . Office of the

bets or wagers in one day, in violation of Section 849.25(3), Florida Statutes (1975).1 The appellees

three counts of bookmaking in violation of Section 849.25, Florida Statutes (1975), before the Circuit

contrary to Florida Statute 849.09 and Florida Statute 849.25 with Roland Rodriguez in the capacity of

Pinellas County on the charge of bookmaking under Fla.Stat. 849.25(2), F.S.A. The bookmaking charge to which