Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 849.23 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 849.23 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 849.23

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 849
GAMBLING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 849.23
849.23 Penalty for violations of ss. 849.15-849.22.Whoever shall violate any of the provisions of ss. 849.15-849.22 shall, upon conviction thereof, be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. Any person convicted of violating any provision of ss. 849.15-849.22, a second time shall, upon conviction thereof, be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. Any person violating any provision of ss. 849.15-849.22 after having been twice convicted already shall be deemed a “common offender,” and shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.s. 3, ch. 18143, 1937; CGL 1940 Supp. 8135(21); s. 1070, ch. 71-136.

F.S. 849.23 on Google Scholar

F.S. 849.23 on Casetext

Amendments to 849.23


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 849.23
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S849.23 - GAMBLING - VIOL LAW RE SLOT MACHINE THIRD OR SUBSQ VIOL - F: T
S849.23 - GAMBLING - VIOLATE LAW REGARDING SLOT MACHINE 2ND VIOL - M: F
S849.23 - GAMBLING - VIOLATE LAW REGARDING SLOT MACHINE 1ST VIOL - M: S



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 849.23

Total Results: 11

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2007-11-07

Snippet: violation of the statute prohibiting lotteries; s. 849.23, Fla. Stat., describing the penalty for violations

Delorme v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-03-04

Citation: 895 So. 2d 1252, 2005 WL 497260

Snippet: misdemeanor in violation of sections 849.15(1)(2) and 849.23, Florida Statutes. Appellants, all represented

Butterworth v. Tropic Casino Cruises, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-10-19

Citation: 796 So. 2d 1283, 2001 WL 1245233

Snippet: analysis, this Court concludes that Fla. Stat. § 849.23(1) exempts those who have registered under the

DEPT. of LEGAL AFFAIRS v. Bradenton Group

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-09-24

Citation: 727 So. 2d 199, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 485, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1824, 1998 WL 650595

Snippet: . 32. Section 849.09, s. 849.14, s. 849.15, s. 849.23, or s. 849.25, relating to gambling. § 895.02(1)(a)(32)

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1998-06-26

Snippet: person is arrested for violating sections 849.15-849.23, Florida Statutes, relating to slot machines, "the

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1998-02-05

Snippet: violation of the statute prohibiting lotteries, and s. 849.23, Fla. Stat., describing the penalty for violations

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1994-08-15

Snippet: or displayed in contravention of sections 849.15-849.23, Florida Statutes (1993), and are ultimately shipped

Polakoff v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-08-08

Citation: 586 So. 2d 385, 1991 WL 148349

Snippet: usury. 4. Section 849.09, s. 849.14, s. 849.15, s. 849.23, s. 849.24, or s. 849.25, relating to gambling

Vickery v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-02-15

Citation: 539 So. 2d 499, 1989 WL 12440

Snippet: * (24) Section 849.09, s. 849.14, s. 849.15, s. 849.23, s. 849.24, or s. 849.25, relating to gambling

Bowden v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-07-30

Citation: 402 So. 2d 1173

Snippet: profanity. 23. Section 849.09, s. 849.14, s. 849.15, s. 849.23, s. 849.24, or s. 849.25, relating to gambling

Davis v. Ivey and Estes

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-03-05

Citation: 112 So. 264, 93 Fla. 387

Snippet: in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $19,849.23. The trial Judge refused to set aside that verdict