Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 945.72 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 945.72 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 945.72

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 945
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 945.72
945.72 Eligibility and screening of inmates.
(1) The provisions of ss. 945.71-945.74 apply to all eligible inmates in state correctional institutions.
(2) Upon receipt of an inmate into the prison system, the department shall screen the inmate for the training program. To participate, an inmate must have no physical limitations which would preclude participation in strenuous activity and must not be impaired. In screening an inmate for the training program, the department shall consider the inmate’s criminal history and the possible rehabilitative benefits of “shock” incarceration.
History.s. 25, ch. 92-310.

F.S. 945.72 on Google Scholar

F.S. 945.72 on Casetext

Amendments to 945.72


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 945.72
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 945.72.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 945.72

Total Results: 3

Cavalier v. Ignas

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-05-14

Citation: 294 So. 2d 720, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7311

Snippet: ORDER ON MANDATE PER CURIAM. Whereas, the judgment of this court was issued in this cause on March 20, 1973 (275 So.2d 293) affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court’ of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed January 31, 1974 (290 So.2d 20) and mandate now lodged in this court quashed this court’s judgment with directions; Now, therefore, it is ordered that the

Cavalier v. Ignas

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-03-20

Citation: 275 So. 2d 293

Snippet: Appellants, v. Stanley M. IGNAS, Appellee. Nos. 72-945, 72-948. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third

Ratner v. Arrington

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-04-09

Citation: 111 So. 2d 82

Snippet: 192 F.2d 217, 220, certiorari denied 342 U.S. 945, 72 S.Ct. 558, 96 L.Ed. 703; Israel v. United States