O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 10-12-1 (2019)
Short title
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Uniform Electronic Transactions Act.”
History
Code 1981, § 10-12-1, enacted by Ga. L. 2009, p. 698, § 1/HB 126.
Annotations
Cross references. Electronic records, signatures and filing documents, § 44-2-35 et seq.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2006–2025 · leading case: State of Georgia v. Fed. Def. Prog., Inc., 315 Ga. 319 (Ga. 2022).
State of Georgia v. Fed. Def. Prog., Inc., 315 Ga. 319 (Ga. 2022). “See OCGA § 10-12-1 et seq. (as amended by Ga.”
Davis v. Harpagon Co., LLC, 637 S.E.2d 1 (Ga. 2006). “in this instance was not properly signed pursuant to the Electronic Records and Signatures Act, OCGA § 10-12-1 et seq., she admits that this act did not become effective until April 22,1997, after the fi.”
Georgia Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Just., 907 S.E.2d 817 (Ga. 2024). “Moreover, under general principles of contract law, a contract can be “memorialized in an e- mail for purposes of determining whether the State has waived its sovereign immunity,” and the Georgia Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, OCGA § 10-12-1 et seq., applies to a State…”
Richard Andrew Just. v. Georgia Dep't of Pub. Saf. (Ga. Ct. App. 2023). “14 See OCGA § 10-12-2 (8) (for purposes of GUETA, an “‘Electronic signature’ means an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically 11 anyone other than Justice.”
Maria Cristina Valle Galeana v. Erin Mccommon (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). “See OCGA § 10-12-1 et seq. 19 Part 1 of Article 1 of Chapter 2 of Title 44 concerns the recording of deeds and other real property transactions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.