O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 12-3-230 (2019)
Short title
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This part may be cited as the ‘‘Jekyll Island - State Park Authority Act.’’
History
Ga. L. 1950, p. 152, § 1; Ga. L. 1963, p. 391, § 1.
Annotations
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Mean high tide controls. - Jekyll Island State Park Authority does not have discretion to adopt the ‘‘65/35 Task Force’’ Recommendation to the extent that it uses a measurement reference point other than Mean High Tide. Any proposal to modify the 1996 Master Plan so as to increase
substantially the measured land area of the island be thoroughly evaluated in a public process and finally adopted only after the General Assembly has been given the opportunity to weigh in on the proposal. 2013 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 13-2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1983–1999 · leading case: Motel Props., Inc. v. Miller, 436 S.E.2d 196 (Ga. 1993).
Motel Props., Inc. v. Miller, 436 S.E.2d 196 (Ga. 1993). “[7] We find utterly without merit Miller's argument that the lease agreement between the Authority and the motel's predecessor-assignor, by containing provisions for the Authority's exercise of its statutory obligations for the governing of Jekyll Island State Park, see OCGA §…”
Diane FOUCHE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the JEKYLL ISLAND-STATE PARK Auth., Defendant-Appellee, 713 F.2d 1518 (11th Cir. 1983). “under this part,” and O.C.G.A. § 12-3-230 reveals that “part” refers to the entire “Jekyll Island-State Park Authority Act.”
Jekyll Dev. Assocs., L.P. v. Glynn Cnty. Bd. of Tax Assessors, 523 S.E.2d 370 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). “McMurray, P. J., and Ruffin, J., concur.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.