Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1979, p. 1127, § 13; Ga. L. 1985, p. 266, § 7; Ga. L. 1988, p. 727, § 4; Ga. L. 1992, p. 2234, § 5.)
- Finding that company holding a "corrective action permit" wilfully and flagrantly violated the corrective action plan and that the Environmental Protection Division acted reasonably in attempting to obtain compliance was sufficient to show the division acted in accord with the requirements of O.C.G.A. § 12-8-71. Reheis v. AZS Corp., 232 Ga. App. 852, 503 S.E.2d 36 (1998).
- 73 C.J.S., Public Administrative Law and Procedure, § 180. 73A C.J.S., Public Administrative Law, § 223.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1972-02-02
Citation: 187 S.E.2d 824, 228 Ga. 708, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 892, 79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2620
Snippet: Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., 404 U. S. (decided 12-8-71). I take the further position that, in the absence