O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 14-11-405 (2019)

Distributions upon event of dissociation

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Effective for limited liability companies formed prior to July 1, 1999, except as otherwise provided in the articles of organization or a written operating agreement, and subject to Code Section 14-11-407, a member with respect to which an event of dissociation occurs (other than one of the events specified in paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of subsection (b) of Code Section 14-11-601) is entitled to receive, within a reasonable time after the occurrence of the event, the fair value of the member’s interest in the limited liability company as of the date of such occurrence, but only if such event does not result in dissolution of the limited liability company.

(b) Effective for limited liability companies formed on or after July 1, 1999, except as otherwise provided in the articles of organization or a written operating agreement, a member with respect to which an event of dissociation occurs under Code Section 14-11-601.1 is not entitled to receive any payment by reason of such event and will become an assignee as to such limited liability company interest.

History

(Code 1981, § 14-11-405, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 123, § 1; Ga. L. 1995, p. 470, § 18; Ga. L. 1999, p. 822, § 1; Ga. L. 2002, p. 1235, § 3.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2000–2000 · leading case: Lieberman v. Wyoming. Com LLC, 11 P.3d 353 (Wyo. 2000).
Lieberman v. Wyoming. Com LLC, 11 P.3d 353 (Wyo. 2000). “) (Withdrawal of member and distribution upon withdrawal); Ga.Code Ann. § 14-11-405 (Harrison 1999 Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.