O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 14-3-1604 (2019)

Court-ordered inspection

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If a corporation does not allow a member who complies with subsection (b) of Code Section 14-3-1602 to inspect and copy any records required by that subsection to be available for inspection, the superior court may summarily order inspection and copying of the records demanded at the corporation’s expense upon application of the member.

(b) If a corporation does not within a reasonable time allow a member to inspect and copy any other record, the member who complies with subsections (b) and (c) of Code Section 14-3-1602 may apply to the superior court for an order to permit inspection and copying of the records demanded. The court shall dispose of an application under this subsection on an expedited basis.

(c) If the court orders inspection and copying of the records demanded, it shall also order the corporation to pay the member’s costs (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) incurred to obtain the order unless the corporation proves that it refused inspection in good faith because it had a reasonable basis for doubt about the right of the member to inspect the records demanded.

(d) If the court orders inspection and copying of the records demanded, it may impose reasonable restrictions on the use or distribution of the records by the demanding member.

History

(Code 1981, § 14-3-1604, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 465, § 1.)

Annotations

Code Commission notes. - Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1991, ‘‘of ’’ was inserted preceding ‘‘Code Section’’ in subsection (a).

Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘2008 Annual Review of Case Law Development,’’ see 14 (No. 6) Ga. St. B. J. 28 (2009).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Reasonable time required for corporation to respond to request. - Proceedings violated a nonprofit corporation’s

due process rights when the court signed an order allowing a member of the corporation access to corporate records without

CORPORATIONS & PARTNERSHIPS

giving the corporation a reasonable opportunity to prepare and present defenses to the demand for inspection. Westbury Square Townhouses Ass’n v. Bryan, 223 Ga. App. 885, 479 S.E.2d 190 (1996). Costs. - Under O.C.G.A. § 14-3-1604(c), plaintiff ’s recovery is limited to those fees and expenses incurred to obtain the relief sought; it is not a blanket provision to obtain all fees. Park Ridge Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Callais, 290 Ga. App. 875, 660 S.E.2d 736 (2008). After trial court ordered condominium association to allow a member to inspect and copy records, it was error to award the member all attorney fees and expenses under O.C.G.A. § 14-3-1604(c); member was entitled only to those expenses and fees directly incurred in obtaining the order allowing the member to inspect and copy the records. Park Ridge Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Callais, 290 Ga. App. 875, 660 S.E.2d 736 (2008). Discretion of trial court. - In ruling

on an application pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 14-3-1604 to inspect and copy the books of a nonprofit corporation, the trial court has much discretion to determine whether the purpose named is a proper one and its findings with respect to whether an applicant has shown a proper purpose must stand unless it is clearly erroneous. Parker v. Clary Lakes Rec. Ass’n, 243 Ga. App. 681, 534 S.E.2d 154 (2000). Authority of court to order inspection. - Trial court properly dismissed the tobacco farmers’ claim for an equitable accounting of a tobacco cooperative because it was undisputed that that the tobacco cooperative was a foreign corporation organized under North Carolina law and, therefore, the trial court lacked the authority to order an inspection of the tobacco cooperative’s records. Rigby v. Flue-Cured Tobacco Coop. Stabilization Corp., 327 Ga. App. 29, 755 S.E.2d 915 (2014).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2024 · leading case: Westbury Square Townhouses Ass'n v. Bryan, 479 S.E.2d 190 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996).
Westbury Square Townhouses Ass'n v. Bryan, 479 S.E.2d 190 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 26× “In this case of first impression, we must answer a question of *886 procedure under OCGA § 14-3-1604, which governs orders allowing members of nonprofit corporations access to corporate records.”
Parker v. Clary Lakes Rec. Ass'n, 534 S.E.2d 154 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 8× “” Parker applied to the superior court under OCGA § 14-3-1604 for an order directing CLRA to produce the requested documents and for an award of attorney fees.”
Jarallah v. Am. Culinary Fed'n, Inc., 529 S.E.2d 919 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 5× “Tajuddin JarAllah filed an application pursuant to OCGA § 14-3-1604 for an order allowing him to inspect and copy records of American Culinary Federation, Inc.”
Park Ridge Condo. Ass'n v. Callais, 660 S.E.2d 736 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 14× “” Apparently, Park Ridge did not permit Calíais to inspect the records, and she filed suit on November 1, 2005, seeking expedited relief in accordance with OCGA § 14-3-1604 (a) and (b). Calíais also sought payment of attorney fees in accordance with OCGA § 14-3-1604 (c).”
Rigby v. Flue-Cured Tobacco Coop. Stabilization Corp., 755 S.E.2d 915 (Ga. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “Under OCGA § 14-3-1604 (a), [i]f a corporation does not allow a member who complies with subsection (b) of Code Section 14-3-1602[ 6 ] to inspect and copy any records required by that subsection to be available for inspection, the superior court may summarily order inspection…”
JarAllah v. Schoen, 531 S.E.2d 778 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “JarAllah’s request was based on an order issued on June 24, 1998, permitting him to inspect and copy ACF’s records.”
Cardea Corp. Holdings, Inc. v. Carolyn Larocco (Ga. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 8× “885, 887-890 (2) ( 479 SE2d 190 ) (1996) (physical precedent only), this Court did interpret the due process requirements of a virtually identical statute (OCGA § 14-3-1604) and we find its reasoning applicable here.”
Julian A. Rigby v. Flue-Cured Tobacco Coop. Stabilization Corp. (Ga. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “Under OCGA § 14-3-1604 (a), [i]f a corporation does not allow a member who complies with subsection (b) of Code Section 14-3-1602[6] to inspect and copy any records required by that subsection to be available for inspection, the superior court may summarily order inspection and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.