O.C.G.A. § 15-12-4 (2019)
Eligibility of person to serve as a trial or grand juror
(a) Any person who has served as a trial or grand juror at any session of the superior or state courts shall be ineligible for duty as a juror until the next succeeding county master jury list has been received by the clerk. (b) In addition to any other qualifications provided under this chapter, no person shall be qualified to serve as a juror under this chapter unless that person is a citizen of the United States.
History
(Ga. L. 1903, p. 83, §§ 1, 2; Penal Code 1910, §§ 824, 825; Ga. L. 1911, p. 72, § 1; Code 1933, §§ 59-114, 59-115; Ga. L. 1983, p. 884, § 3-15; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 15; Ga. L. 2011, p. 59, § 1-7/HB 415; Ga. L. 2014, p. 451, § 5/HB 776; Ga. L. 2014, p. 862, § 4/HB 1078.)
Annotations
Editor’s notes. - Ga. L. 2011, p. 59, § 1-1/HB 415, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: ‘‘This Act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘Jury Composition Reform Act of 2011.’ ’’
JUDICIAL DECISIONS Failure to object waives error in not questioning juror. - Since the trial court failed to ask the first juror whether that juror had served as a member of the grand jury or traverse jury during the previous term, any error was waived by the defendant’s failure to object at the time. Whittington v. State, 252 Ga. 168, 313 S.E.2d 73 (1984). Plea in abatement filed before arraignment of defendant sustained if section is violated. Tompkins v. State, 138 Ga. 465, 75 S.E. 594 (1912); Long v. State, 160 Ga. 291, 127 S.E. 842 (1925). Disqualification is disqualification propter defectum. - Disqualification or ineligibility of a grand juror or grand jurors to serve as such at one term because the juror served as a member or members of the grand jury at the immediate preceding term of the court is a disqualification propter defectum, and if possible, the question of the ineligibility of the juror or the jurors to serve must be made before the juror or jurors act and return the true bill. Hawkins v. State, 86 Ga. App. 872, 72 S.E.2d 778 (1952).
Fact that juror served at preceding term not ground for new trial. - Fact that one of the jurors who tried the case had, unknown to the defendant or the defendant’s counsel, served as a traverse juror at the next preceding term of the superior court, while a good ground for challenge, is not ground for a new trial. Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Benton, 43 Ga. App. 495, 159 S.E. 717 (1931), rev’d on other grounds, 175 Ga. 491, 165 S.E. 593 (1932). Local act fixing terms and providing for grand juries in superior courts is general law and as such can change or modify this section. Long v. State, 34 Ga. App. 125, 128 S.E. 784 (1925); Brown v. State, 242 Ga. 602, 250 S.E.2d 491 (1978). Cited in Wall v. State, 126 Ga. 86, 54 S.E. 815 (1906); Staten v. State, 141 Ga. 82, 80 S.E. 850 (1913); Johns v. State, 180 Ga. 187, 178 S.E. 707 (1935); Hawkins v. State, 86 Ga. App. 872, 72 S.E.2d 778 (1952); Lundy v. State, 119 Ga. App. 585, 168 S.E.2d 199 (1969); Jones v. State, 137 Ga. App. 612, 224 S.E.2d 473 (1976).
RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 47 Am. Jur. 2d, Jury, §§ 161, 163. C.J.S. - 50A C.J.S., Juries, § 300. ALR. - Service on jury in prosecution for selling intoxicating liquor as disqualification as juror in similar case, 3 ALR 1206.
Prior service on grand jury which considered indictment against accused as disqualification for service on petit jury, 24 ALR3d 1236.