O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-12-65 (2019)

Service of summons; time limits

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Reserved. Repealed by Ga. L. 2011, p. 59, § 1-32/HB 415, effective July 1, 2012.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - This Code section was based on Ga. L. 1869, p. 139, § 4; Code 1873, § 3913; Code 1882, § 3913; Penal Code 1895, § 824; Penal Code 1910, § 827; Code 1933, § 59-206; Ga. L. 1964,

p. 284, § 1; Ga. L. 1976, p. 438, § 8; Ga. L. 1985, p. 149, § 15; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1589, § 6; Ga. L. 2011, p. 59, § 1-32/HB 415, and was repealed on its own terms, effective July 1, 2012.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1986–2002 · leading case: George v. State, 505 S.E.2d 743 (Ga. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

George v. State, 505 S.E.2d 743 (Ga. 1998). · cites it 4× “ection (b) provides in full as follows: (b) Subsection (a) of this Code section shall be applicable only if: (1) At the time the names of trial jurors are drawn by the judge of the superior court in accordance with Code Section 15-12-120, the judge who draws the jurors shall…”

Hunt v. State, 420 S.E.2d 656 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 15-12-65. However, we find no merit in appellant’s argument that his case was somehow prejudiced by the jurors’ failure to receive the requisite notice.”

Thompkins v. State, 351 S.E.2d 475 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “on the part of public officers, shall be deemed and held sufficient, and no proceeding shall be declared void for want of such compliance, unless expressly so provided by law.” OCGA § 1-3-1 (c). Cf. Lumpkin v.”

George v. State, 494 S.E.2d 526 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “One such criterion requires that “[t]he summons served upon or sent to each of the jurors pursuant to Code Section 15-12-65 affirmatively shows the name of all the courts wherein the juror is eligible to serve.”

Willie Santonio Manders v. Thurman Lee, 338 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2002). “O.C.G.A. § 15-12-65. 21 The State also has assigned sheriffs the function of determining which companies may make bonds in their jurisdictions.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.