O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-14-23 (2019)

Judicial Council of Georgia as agency of judiciary for purposes of article

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Judicial Council of Georgia, as created by Article 2 of Chapter 5 of this title, is declared to be an agency of the judicial branch of the state government for the purpose of defining and regulating the practice of court reporting in this state.

History

(Ga. L. 1974, p. 345, § 3; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1315, § 7.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Judicial Council of Georgia and Board of Court Reporting were part of the judiciary and therefore excluded from coverage. - Judicial Council of Georgia and the Board of Court Reporting of the Judicial Council of Georgia fell within ‘‘the judiciary,’’ as that term

was used in O.C.G.A. § 50-13-2(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act, and therefore were exempt from the coverage of the Act and immune from a suit challenging a court reporter ethics rule the board adopted. Judicial Council v. Brown & Gallo, LLC, 288 Ga. 294, 702 S.E.2d 894 (2010).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Jud. Council of Ga. v. BROWN & GALLO, 702 S.E.2d 894 (Ga. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jud. Council of Ga. v. BROWN & GALLO, 702 S.E.2d 894 (Ga. 2010). · cites it 6× “ng, among other things, that the Administrative Procedure Act’s exclusion of “the judiciary” from its definition of “agency” in OCGA § 50-13-2 (l) 4 did not include the Council and *296 the Board because they were formed to define and regulate the practice of court reporting and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.