O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-18-9 (2019)

Authority to enter nolle prosequi

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The district attorney has authority, on the terms prescribed by law, to enter a nolle prosequi on indictments.

History

(Orig. Code 1863, § 354; Code 1868, § 415; Code 1873, § 380; Code 1882, § 380; Penal Code 1895, § 801; Penal Code 1910, § 801; Code 1933, § 24-2915.)

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR. - Power and duty of court as to continuation of action or prosecution upon refusal of city, county, or district attorney to proceed therewith, 103 A.L.R. 1253.

Limitations on state prosecuting attorney's discretion to initiate prosecution by indictment or by information, 44 A.L.R.4th 401.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1997–1997 · leading case: Gourley v. State, 486 S.E.2d 342 (Ga. 1997).
Gourley v. State, 486 S.E.2d 342 (Ga. 1997). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 15-18-9 (authorizing State to enter nolle prosequi on terms prescribed by law).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.