O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 16-13-51 (2019)
Judicial review of administrative determinations, findings, and conclusions
✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
All final determinations, findings, and conclusions of the State Board of Pharmacy under this article are final and conclusive decisions of the matters involved. Any person aggrieved by the decision may obtain review of the decision in the Superior Court of Fulton County. Findings of fact by the State Board of Pharmacy, if supported by substantial evidence, are conclusive.
History
Code 1933, § 79A-830, enacted by Ga.
L. 1974, p. 221, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 16.
Annotations
RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. 28 C.J.S., Drugs and Narcotics, §§ 213, 219. 73A C.J.S., Public Administrative Law and Procedure, § 374 et seq. U.L.A. Uniform Controlled Substances Act (U.L.A.) § 507.
ALR. Review for excessiveness of sentence in narcotics case, 55 A.L.R.3d 812.