O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 17-12-40 (2019)

Definitions

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this article, the term: (1) ‘‘Circuit public defender’’ means any circuit public defender of this state or assistants of such officer. (2) ‘‘Criminal proceeding’’ means any investigation, trial, juvenile proceeding, adjudicatory hearing, or other legal proceeding by which a person’s liability for a crime is investigated or determined, commencing with the investigation and including the final disposition of the case. (3) ‘‘Law school’’ means a law school within or outside this state which is approved by the American Bar Association or which is authorized to operate under Code Section 20-3-250.8. (4) ‘‘Staff instructor’’ means a full-time professional staff instructor of a law school in this state who has been admitted to the bar of another state but who has not yet been admitted to the bar of this state. (5) ‘‘Third-year law student’’ means a student regularly enrolled and in good standing in a law school within or outside this state who has satisfactorily completed at least two-thirds of the requirements for the first professional degree in law ( J.D. or its equivalent) in not less than four semesters or six quarters of residence.

History

Code 1981, § 17-12-40, enacted by Ga. L. 2003, p. 191, § 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1983–2006 · leading case: Pless v. State, 633 S.E.2d 340 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006).
Pless v. State, 633 S.E.2d 340 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “Although this provision was not struck until January 1, 2005 (and thus was in effect at the time of the crimes), this provision did not purport to authorize a court to order such payments in a sentence.”
Reaves v. State, 300 S.E.2d 551 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “Assuming arguendo this issue was properly raised, we find that this special condition of probation would be in compliance with the Georgia Indigent Defense Act, OCGA § 17-12-40 (a) (4) (Code Ann. § 27-3312) (d)).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.