O.C.G.A.
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Unless displaced by the provisions of this article, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relating to principal and agent, estoppel, laches, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, insolvency, or other validating or invalidating cause, supplement its provisions.
History
Code 1981, § 18-2-80, enacted by Ga. L. 2002, p. 141, § 3; Code 1981, § 18-2-82, as
redesignated by Ga. L. 2015, p. 996, § 4A1/SB 65.
Annotations
JUDICIAL DECISIONS Damages available. - Georgia law allowing the recovery of general and punitive damages for fraudulent conveyances survived the enactment of Georgia’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act,
O.C.G.A. § 18-2-70 et seq. Interfinancial Midtown, Inc. v. Choate Constr. Co., 343 Ga. App. 793, 806 S.E.2d 255, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 479 (2017).
RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 37 Am. Jur. 2d, Fraudulent Conveyances and Transfers, § 152 et seq.
C.J.S. 37 C.J.S., Fraudulent Conveyances, § 170 et seq.
Notes of Decisions
Res-Ga Hightower, LLC v. Golshani, 778 S.E.2d 805 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 2× “6 This section was recodified at OCGA § 18-2-82 in connection with the 2015 amendments.”
Interfinancial Midtown, Inc. v. Choate Constr. Co., 806 S.E.2d 255 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “" 11 Additionally, OCGA § 18-2-82 provides: "Unless displaced by the provisions of this article, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relating to .”
Interfinancial Midtown, Inc. v. Choate Constr. Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “”11 Additionally, OCGA § 18-2-82 provides: “Unless displaced by the provisions of this article, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relating to .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.