O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 18-2-83 (2019)
Uniformity with laws of other states
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This article shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this article among states enacting the “Uniform Voidable Transactions Act.”
History
Code 1981, § 18-2-83, enacted by Ga. L. 2015, p. 996, § 4A-1/SB 65.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2019–2025 · leading case: Misty Enlow, a Minor by & Through Deanna Enlow, Her Parent & Guardian v. Glen Enlow (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).
Misty Enlow, a Minor by & Through Deanna Enlow, Her Parent & Guardian v. Glen Enlow (Ga. Ct. App. 2019). “However, courts in a number of other jurisdictions have considered the same issue.”
Windward Campus Owner, LLC v. Good Night Med. of Ohio, LLC (Ga. Ct. App. 2022). “But see OCGA § 18-2-78 (e) (2) (UVTA does apply to secured assets when a creditor utilizes the “strict foreclosure” mechanism of OCGA § 11-9-620); CNH Diversified Opportunities Master Account v.”
Washington Street Apts., LLC v. William Fredd (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). “See OCGA § 18-2-83 (“This article shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this article among states enacting the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.