O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 19-3-64 (2019)

Voluntary execution of antenuptial agreement; conveyance of property during marriage

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A person may voluntarily execute an antenuptial agreement, or he or she may at any time during the marriage, either indirectly through trustees or directly to his or her spouse, convey any property to which he or she has title, subject to the rights of prior purchasers or creditors without notice.

History

Orig. Code 1863, § 1725; Code 1868, § 1766; Code 1873, § 1776; Code 1882, § 1776; Civil Code 1895, § 2481; Civil Code 1910, § 3000; Code 1933, § 53-404; Ga. L. 2018, p. 155, § 1-1/HB 190.

History of Section. The language of this Code section is derived in part from the decisions in Blake v. Irwin, 3 Ga. 345 (1847) and Lafitte v. Lawton, 25 Ga. 305 (1858).

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. 41 C.J.S., Husband and Wife, §§ 144, 145. ALR. Conveyance of interest in community

property by one spouse to other, 37 A.L.R. 282. Action for tortious interference with bequest as precluded by will contest remedy, 18 A.L.R.5th 211.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Property of bankruptcy estate. - Since the Chapter 7 debtor pre-petition executed a deed conveying the debtor’s interest in property to the debtor’s spouse as part of the parties’ settlement agreement before a divorce proceeding was filed, the debtor had no interest in the property on the bankruptcy petition date because the property was transferred pursuant to the deed and not pursuant to the settlement agreement. In re Randolph, 546 B.R. 474, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 620 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2016). Trial court did not abuse discretion in setting aside agreement. - Because

the evidence supported a finding that one spouse failed to make a full and fair disclosure of assets, income, and liabilities to the other spouse prior to the execution of an antenuptial agreement, hiding specific facts of the spouse’s true financial status, the trial court did not abuse the court’s discretion in setting the agreement aside. Blige v. Blige, 283 Ga. 65, 656 S.E.2d 822, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 44 (2008).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2016–2016 · leading case: In re Randolph, 546 B.R. 474 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2016).
In re Randolph, 546 B.R. 474 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2016). · cites it 2× “” O.C.G.A. § 19-3-64. When spouses are living in separation, they may enter into an agreement settling such issues as the division of their marital real property.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.