O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 19-6-13 (2019)

Liability of parents for necessaries furnished to children pending voluntary provision or court order

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Until otherwise provided voluntarily or by decree or order of a court, each party shall be liable to third persons for the board and support and for all necessaries furnished to or for the benefit of the parties’ children.

History

Orig. Code 1863, § 1696; Code 1868, § 1739; Code 1873, § 1749; Code 1882, § 1749; Civil Code 1895, § 2469; Civil Code 1910, § 2988; Code 1933, § 30-215; Ga. L. 1979, p. 466, § 19.

Annotations

Law reviews. For note, “Determining Eligibility for Year’s Support in Georgia: The Tension Between Status and Dependence Requirements,” see 22 Ga. L. Rev. 1167 (1988).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Purpose and intent of statute was to relieve father (now both spouses) of common-law liability to support minor child or children, and substitute therefor a liability by virtue of a court decree. Thomas v. Holt, 209 Ga. 133, 70 S.E.2d 595, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 398 (1952); Booker v. Booker, 219 Ga. 358, 133 S.E.2d 353, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 456 (1963); Clark v. Clark, 228 Ga. 838, 188 S.E.2d 487, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 927 (1972). What are “necessaries” is question for determination of jury according to the circumstances and condition of life of the children. Madden v. Keith, 146 Ga. App. 13, 245 S.E.2d 350, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2183 (1978). Necessary hospital and medical services and ordinary funeral expenses are “necessaries” for which the child’s parent is liable, in the absence of any special contract by which those services are furnished on the account of another. Blue Ridge Park Nurseries v. Owen, 41 Ga. App. 98, 152 S.E. 485, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 469 (1930). Measure of award for period prior to paternity adjudication. - When the court denied a request by the mother of a child for an award of back support from

the father for those periods during the child’s life, before paternity was established, when she had not been receiving public assistance benefits, the amount of the back support to which she was entitled was not to be measured by the father’s ability to pay during the periods in question, but by the expenses actually incurred by the mother on the child’s behalf. Weaver v. Chester, 195 Ga. App. 471, 393 S.E.2d 715, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 568 (1990). Husband’s responsibility for children’s support did not extend to awarding title to property. He was not required to settle an estate upon them. Clark v. Clark, 228 Ga. 838, 188 S.E.2d 487, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 927 (1972). Creditor has no lien. - One furnishing the wife with necessaries as set out in statute stood on the same plane as any other creditor of the husband, and had no lien which he can assert on property of the husband sold to a bona fide purchaser for value before his claim has been reduced to judgment. Lamar v. Jennings, 69 Ga. 392, 1882 Ga. LEXIS 233 (1882). Alleging cause of action. - Allegation that a husband and father failed to supply his wife and daughter with neces-

saries, and that they were furnished by the plaintiff at the request of the wife and mother, set forth a cause of action under

the statute. Humphreys v. Bush, 118 Ga. 628, 45 S.E. 911, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 638 (1903).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 24A Am. Jur. 2d, Divorce and Separation, §§ 609, 610, 613. C.J.S. 27C C.J.S., Divorce, § 1149. ALR. Civil liability of father for necessaries furnished to child taken from home by mother, 32 A.L.R. 1466.

Nature of care contemplated by statute imposing general duty to care for indigent relatives, 92 A.L.R.2d 348. Propriety of decree in proceeding between divorced parents to determine mother’s duty to pay support for children in custody of father, 98 A.L.R.3d 1146.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1986–1990 · leading case: Harper v. Landers, 348 S.E.2d 698 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986).
Harper v. Landers, 348 S.E.2d 698 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “Held : Given appellee's history not only of failure to honor his biological and statutory obligation of support, OCGA §§ 19-6-13 et seq.; 19-7-1, but also of his affirmative and obstinate refusal to pay even when under a court order to do so, it is difficult to resist the…”
Weaver v. Chester, 393 S.E.2d 715 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “However, we cannot agree with the appellant’s contention that the amount of the back support to which she is entitled is to be measured by the father’s ability to pay during the periods in question rather than by the expenses actually incurred by her on the child’s behalf.”
Hunnicutt v. Hunnicutt, 350 S.E.2d 770 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986). “OCGA § 39-1-1 (age of majority); § 19-6-13 (parents’ obligation to support minor children prior to court order in divorce proceedings).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.