O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 20-2-982 (2019)

Purpose

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The following constitute the major purposes of this part: (1) To simplify and make more efficient the process of certifying educational personnel in Georgia; (2) To attract the highest possible number of qualified personnel to become educators in Georgia; (3) To promote the hiring of qualified educators from other states to work in Georgia schools; (4) To improve the level of preparation of educators, both preservice and in-service, by requiring for purposes of certification those essential skills and that knowledge needed to deliver effective education; (5) To adopt standards of professional performance and a code of professional ethics for educators, both of which shall represent standards of performance and conduct which are generally accepted by educators of this state; (6) To investigate reports of specified criminal conduct, violations of professional or ethical codes of conduct, and violations of certain rules, regulations, and policies by school system educators; (7) To enforce the requirement that local school systems promptly report specified criminal conduct of school system educators to the commission; and (8) To impose disciplinary action or a denial of a certificate against an educator.

History

Code 1981, § 20-2-982, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 1546, § 1; Ga. L. 1998, p. 750, § 3.

Annotations

Code Commission notes. Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in

1991, the subsection “(a)” designation was deleted at the beginning of this Code section, since there is no subsection (b).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2001–2017 · leading case: Prof'l Standards Comm'n v. Denham, 556 S.E.2d 920 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001).
Prof'l Standards Comm'n v. Denham, 556 S.E.2d 920 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “1 OCGA § 20-2-982 (5). 2 Sawyer v. Reheis, 213 Ga.”
Prof'l Standards Comm'n v. Smith, 571 S.E.2d 443 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “The charges centered around allegations that Smith used questions from the ITBS to prepare his class for standardized testing. The ITBS is a national achievement test used to measure students’ strengths and weaknesses in a number of academic areas.”
Quigg v. Georgia Prof'l Standards Comm'n., 809 S.E.2d 267 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “" OCGA § 20-2-982 (6). To that end, the Act authorizes the Commission to begin an investigation of alleged ethical violations "[u]pon receipt of a written request from a local board, the state board, or one or more individual residents of this state.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.