O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 22-3-80 (2019)

Definitions

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this article, the term:

(1) ‘‘Existing petroleum pipeline’’ shall have the same meaning as set forth in Code Section 12-17-1.

(2) ‘‘Expansion’’ shall have the same meaning as set forth in Code Section 12-17-1.

(3) ‘‘Extension’’ shall have the same meaning as set forth in Code Section 12-17-1.

(4) ‘‘Maintenance’’ shall have the same meaning as set forth in Code Section 12-17-1.

(5) ‘‘New petroleum pipeline’’ shall have the same meaning as set forth in Code Section 12-17-1.

(6) ‘‘Parallel petroleum pipeline’’ shall have the same meaning as set forth in Code Section 12-17-1.

(7) ‘‘Petroleum pipeline’’ shall have the same meaning as set forth in Code Section 12-17-1.

(8) ‘‘Petroleum pipeline company’’ shall have the same meaning as set forth in Code Section 12-17-1.

History

Code 1981, § 22-3-80, enacted by Ga. L. 2017, p. 744, § 2/HB 413.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1992–2016 · leading case: Jones v. Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC, 784 S.E.2d 865 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jones v. Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC, 784 S.E.2d 865 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “OCGA §§ 22-3-80 and 22-3-81. Jones argues that it was error for the trial court to find that Sabal Trail has eminent domain authority because it is not a pipeline company as that term is used in OCGA §§ 22-3-80 and 22-3-81.”
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Williams, 425 S.E.2d 380 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “Colonial Pipeline Company acquired an easement under land owned by James Williams pursuant to its power of eminent domain (OCGA § 22-3-80). The easement was obtained so that Colonial could install an underground cathodic protection device, a mechanism which protects the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.