O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 26-2-105 (2019)

Inspection of meat food products where prepared; inspection markings; disposition of condemned meat food products; removal of inspectors

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Commissioner shall cause to be made, by inspectors ap332 pointed for that purpose, an examination and inspection of all meat food products prepared in any slaughtering, meat-canning, salting, packing, rendering, or similar establishment where such articles are prepared for commerce.

(b) For the purpose of any examination and inspection, said inspectors shall have access at all times, by day or night, whether the establishment be operated or not, to every part of said establishment.

(c) The inspectors shall mark, stamp, tag, or label as “Inspected and Passed” all such products found to be not adulterated; and said inspectors shall label, mark, stamp, or tag as “Inspected and Condemned” all such products found adulterated; and all such condemned meat food products shall be made unfit for human consumption, as provided for in Code Section 26-2-103. The Commissioner may remove inspectors from any establishment which fails to destroy such condemned meat food products.

History

Ga. L. 1969, p. 1028, § 6.

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 4 Am. Jur. 2d, Animals, § 36 et seq. 35A Am. Jur. 2d, Food, §§ 12, 31.

C.J.S. 3B C.J.S., Animals, § 239. 36A C.J.S., Food, § 17.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: In re Mooney, 503 B.R. 916 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Mooney, 503 B.R. 916 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2014). “§ 26-2-105(b); Tex. Prop. Code § 42.0021(a); Va.”
— 26-2-105(b) — 1 case
In re Mooney, 503 B.R. 916 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2014). “§ 26-2-105(b); Tex. Prop. Code § 42.0021(a); Va.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.