O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 29-2-19 (2019)

Requirements of order granting permanent guardianship

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An order granting permanent guardianship shall specify:

(1) The name of the permanent guardian and the basis for the selection of the guardian;

(2) A specific listing of any of the additional powers which are granted to the permanent guardian as provided in subsection (b) of Code Section 29-2-22;

(3) If only a guardian is appointed or if the guardian and the conservator appointed are not the same person, the reasonable sums of property to be provided the guardian to provide adequately for the minor’s support, care, education, health, and welfare are subject to modification by subsequent order of the court; and

(4) Such other and further provisions of the guardianship as the court shall determine to be in the best interest of the minor.

History

(Code 1981, § 29-2-19, enacted by Ga. L. 2004, p. 161, § 1.)

Annotations

ARTICLE 2 PROTECTION OF MINOR

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2011–2011 · leading case: D.R. Ex Rel. Igles v. Grant, 770 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (M.D. Ga. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
D.R. Ex Rel. Igles v. Grant, 770 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (M.D. Ga. 2011). · cites it 6× “] O.C.G.A. § 29-2-19. Defendants have entered exhibits relating to the extent of Plaintiff Igles’s statutory authority as permanent guardian of the Plaintiff children.”
— 29-2-19(2) — 1 case
D.R. Ex Rel. Igles v. Grant, 770 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (M.D. Ga. 2011). “] O.C.G.A. § 29-2-19. Defendants have entered exhibits relating to the extent of Plaintiff Igles’s statutory authority as permanent guardian of the Plaintiff children.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.