O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 3-1-1 (2019)

Short title

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This title shall be known and may be cited as the ‘‘Georgia Alcoholic Beverage Code.’’

History

Code 1933, § 5A-101, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1573, § 1.

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms. - 14C Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Intoxicating Liquors, § 1 et seq.

ALR. - Interplay between Twenty-First Amendment and Commerce Clause concerning state regulation of intoxicating liquors, 116 A.L.R.5th 149.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1989–1993 · leading case: James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. State, 437 S.E.2d 782 (Ga. 1993).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. State, 437 S.E.2d 782 (Ga. 1993). · cites it 4× “Finally, within the Georgia Alcoholic Beverage Code (OCGA § 3-1-1 et seq.) there is in place the means by which appellant, as a licensed wholesale dealer (see OCGA § 3-1-2 (23)), could receive administrative review, complete with notice and a hearing, of the commissioner's…”

Whelchel v. Laing Props., Inc., 378 S.E.2d 478 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 4× “The duty would be founded solely on the presentation to a business, as described in OCGA § 3-1-1, (referred to as a "commercial establishment" in Tibbs, supra, 643-644 ), of a noticeably intoxicated person who sought another drink.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.