✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. State, 437 S.E.2d 782 (Ga. 1993). · cites it 4דFinally, within the Georgia Alcoholic Beverage Code (OCGA § 3-1-1 et seq.) there is in place the means by which appellant, as a licensed wholesale dealer (see OCGA § 3-1-2 (23)), could receive administrative review, complete with notice and a hearing, of the commissioner's…”
Whelchel v. Laing Props., Inc., 378 S.E.2d 478 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 4דThe duty would be founded solely on the presentation to a business, as described in OCGA § 3-1-1, (referred to as a "commercial establishment" in Tibbs, supra, 643-644 ), of a noticeably intoxicated person who sought another drink.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.