Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 3-3-9 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 3 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES

Section 3. Regulation of Alcoholic Beverages Generally, 3-3-1 through 3-3-46.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

3-3-9. Penalty for violations of prohibitions in chapter.

  1. It is unlawful for any person knowingly and intentionally to violate any prohibition contained in this chapter.
  2. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, any person who violates any prohibition contained in this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

(Code 1933, § 5A-9901, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1573, § 1.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Not criminal act to violate Department of Revenue regulation.

- O.C.G.A. §§ 3-3-9 and3-3-27(c)(2) provide that it is a misdemeanor to violate a prohibition or provision of the Georgia Alcoholic Beverage Code, but these provisions do not make it a criminal act to violate a Georgia Department of Revenue regulation; although the parties intended to circumvent Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 560-2-2-.38 by issuing corporate stock to an employee's wife, the stock agreement was not illegal or immoral; thus, a trial court erred in voiding the stock interest of the employee's wife, and summary judgment in favor of the corporation in the wife's action for an accounting, dissolution, and other relief was reversed. Edwards v. Grapefields, Inc., 267 Ga. App. 399, 599 S.E.2d 489 (2004).

Cases Citing Georgia Code 3-3-9 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 2

Rouse v. Department of Natural Resources

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-11-22

Citation: 524 S.E.2d 455, 271 Ga. 726, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 4106, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 1029

Snippet: [7] See OCGA § 52-1-6. [8] See OCGA § 52-1-3(3). [9] OCGA § 52-1-3(3). [10] See OCGA § 12-2-1(c)

Stuckey v. Storms

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1995-06-29

Citation: 265 Ga. 491, 458 S.E.2d 344

Snippet: delay in instituting a proceeding. *492 OCGA §§ 9-3-3; 9-11-8 (c). Therefore, the defense of laches is inapplicable