Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 5A-9901, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1573, § 1.)
- O.C.G.A. §§ 3-3-9 and3-3-27(c)(2) provide that it is a misdemeanor to violate a prohibition or provision of the Georgia Alcoholic Beverage Code, but these provisions do not make it a criminal act to violate a Georgia Department of Revenue regulation; although the parties intended to circumvent Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 560-2-2-.38 by issuing corporate stock to an employee's wife, the stock agreement was not illegal or immoral; thus, a trial court erred in voiding the stock interest of the employee's wife, and summary judgment in favor of the corporation in the wife's action for an accounting, dissolution, and other relief was reversed. Edwards v. Grapefields, Inc., 267 Ga. App. 399, 599 S.E.2d 489 (2004).
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-11-22
Citation: 524 S.E.2d 455, 271 Ga. 726, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 4106, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 1029
Snippet: [7] See OCGA § 52-1-6. [8] See OCGA § 52-1-3(3). [9] OCGA § 52-1-3(3). [10] See OCGA § 12-2-1(c)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1995-06-29
Citation: 265 Ga. 491, 458 S.E.2d 344
Snippet: delay in instituting a proceeding. *492 OCGA §§ 9-3-3; 9-11-8 (c). Therefore, the defense of laches is inapplicable