O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 31-7-408 (2019)

Notice required prior to issuance or renewal of permit to operate hospital; permit subject to revocation or suspension for failure to comply

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No permit to operate a hospital may be issued or renewed under this chapter or any other applicable statute or regulation and a permit which has been issued shall be subject to revocation or suspension if there is a disposition or acquisition of hospital assets as defined in this article without notice first having been provided to the Attorney General as required by this article.

History

Code 1981, § 31-7-408, enacted by Ga. L. 1997, p. 1091, § 1.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Turpen v. Rabun County Bd. of Comm’rs, 245 Ga. App. 190, 537 S.E.2d 435 (2000).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1999–2020 · leading case: Turpen v. Rabun Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 537 S.E.2d 435 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Turpen v. Rabun Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 537 S.E.2d 435 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “OCGA §§ 31-7-408; 31-7-412(a). On April 2, 1999, Rabun County entered into a "Sales Contract" with The Woodlands Foundation, Inc.”
Sparks v. Hosp. Auth., 526 S.E.2d 593 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “Under OCGA § 31-7-408, a hospital permit may not be issued or renewed and, in fact, may be revoked if a disposition or acquisition takes place without the required notice being provided to the Attorney General.”
Cobb Hosp., Inc. v. Emory-Adventist, Inc., 851 S.E.2d 208 (Ga. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 4× “11 See OCGA § 31-7-408. 12 Id. 13 Emory presents some of these arguments in its response brief, but because the arguments challenge the justiciability of the appeal, we treat them along with the arguments presented in the motion to dismiss.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.