O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-22-1 (2019)

Short title

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the ‘‘Insurance Premium Finance Company Act.’’

History

Ga. L. 1969, p. 561, § 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1984–1999 · leading case: Int'l Indem. Co. v. Bakco Acceptance, Inc., 322 S.E.2d 78 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Int'l Indem. Co. v. Bakco Acceptance, Inc., 322 S.E.2d 78 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “The Insurance Premium Finance Act, OCGA § 33-22-1 et seq. sets forth no express requirement that the 30-day notification period be met as a prerequisite to the premium insurance company’s entitlement to return of unearned premiums under OCGA § 33-22-14, and this court will not…”

Paulsen Street Investors v. EBCO Gen. Agencies, 514 S.E.2d 904 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “Now we consider the issue of whether a premium finance company must be licensed under the provisions of OCGA §§ 33-22-1 through 33-22-16, the Insurance Premium Finance Company Act, before it may make a claim under the provisions of that law for the return of unearned premiums on…”

Paulsen Street Investors v. EBCO Gen. Agencies, 481 S.E.2d 246 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 33-22-1 et seq. A security interest is created by statute on behalf of the premium financer when the insured signs the insurance premium finance agreement.”

Gill Plumbing Co. v. Imperial Premium Fin. Co., 445 S.E.2d 840 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “(“Imperial”), an insurance premium finance company governed under the Insurance Premium Finance Company Act (OCGA § 33-22-1 et seq.), moved for summary judgment, which was granted, and Gill Plumbing appeals.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.