O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-30-11 (2019)

Applicability of Chapter 29 of title to group or blanket policies

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Chapter 29 of this title shall not apply to group accident and sickness or blanket accident and sickness insurance policies; but, except as otherwise provided in this chapter, no policy of group or blanket accident and sickness insurance shall contain any provision relative to notice or proof of loss, to the time for paying benefits, or to the time within which an action may be brought on the policy, which provision is less favorable to the individuals insured than would be permitted by the comparable provisions required for individual accident and sickness insurance policies.

History

Code 1933, § 56-3108, enacted by Ga. L. 1960, p. 289, § 1.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Thompson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 115 Ga. App. 724, 155 S.E.2d 728 (1967).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1991–1991 · leading case: Jefferson Pilot Life Ins. v. Clark, 414 S.E.2d 521 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991).
Jefferson Pilot Life Ins. v. Clark, 414 S.E.2d 521 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “Also, contrary to Mr. Clark's allegations, the record supports the *389 trial court's conclusion the insurance policy was a group accident policy, issued pursuant to his son's employment with the Georgia Department of Corrections.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.