O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-35-14 (2019)

Administration of deposits of plans

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any deposits of a sponsor of a prepaid legal services plan deposited with the Commissioner pursuant to this chapter shall be administered by the Commissioner in accordance with Chapter 12 of this title as though deposited by a domestic casualty, life, or accident and sickness insurer authorized to transact insurance in this state.

History

Code 1933, § 56-3521, enacted by Ga. L. 1975, p. 1268, § 1; Ga. L. 1983, p. 748, § 7; Ga. L. 2019, p. 386, § 124/SB 133. The 2019 amendment, effective July

1, 2019, deleted ‘‘or as deposited by a corporation authorized to transact business in this state pursuant to Chapter 18 or 19 of this title’’ following ‘‘state’’ at the end of this Code section.

Annotations

The 2019 amendment, effective July 1, 2019, deleted "or as deposited by a corporation authorized to transact business in this state pursuant to Chapter 18 or 19 of this title" following "state" at the end of this Code section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2019–2019 · leading case: Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool v. Carla R. Dubose, 825 S.E.2d 606 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool v. Carla R. Dubose, 825 S.E.2d 606 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “The Pool next argues that the trial court erred in limiting the offset rights of the Pool under OCGA § 33-35-14 to amounts received by DuBose specific to lost wages and medical expenses.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.