O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-5-20 (2019)

Short title

✓ O.C.G.A.: 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article shall be known and may be cited as ‘‘The Surplus Line Insurance Law.’’

History

Code 1933, § 56-613, enacted by Ga. L. 1960, p. 289, § 1; Ga. L. 2020, p. 493, § 33/SB 429. The 2020 amendment, effective July 29, 2020, part of an Act to revise, modern-

ize, and correct the Code, substituted ‘‘shall be known and may be cited as’’ for ‘‘shall constitute and may be referred to as’’ in this Code section.

Annotations

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Surplus line insurance unacceptable as used car dealer licensure. - The State Board of Registration of Used Car Dealers may not accept surplus line

insurance in lieu of the surety bond required by O.C.G.A. § 43-47-8(h) for proper licensure. 1994 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 94-5.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1997–2017 · leading case: Tyson Et Al. v. Scottsdale Indem. Co.., 805 S.E.2d 138 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tyson Et Al. v. Scottsdale Indem. Co.., 805 S.E.2d 138 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “Tyson and Rowe appeal, contending that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because (1) the policy did not exclude Tyson; (2) there were genuine issues of material fact regarding whether Rowe had knowledge of the policy exclusions and whether Scottsdale made…”
Penn Am. Ins. v. Miller, 492 S.E.2d 571 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “1 The parties characterize this policy as “surplus lines” insurance issued pursuant to OCGA § 33-5-20 et seq. As of July 1, 1997, an amendment to OCGA § 33-5-21.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.