O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-6-11 (2019)

Intervenor appeal for judicial review

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If the report of the Commissioner does not charge a violation of this article, any intervenor in the proceedings may cause a review of such decision by appeal to the Superior Court of Fulton County as provided for in Chapter 2 of this title. Upon that review, the court shall have authority to issue appropriate orders and decrees in connection with such review, including, if the court finds that it is in the public interest, orders enjoining and restraining the continuance of any method of competition, act, or practice which it finds constitutes a violation of this article notwithstanding the report of the Commissioner.

History

Code 1933, § 56-710, enacted by Ga. L. 1960, p. 289, § 1; Code 1933, § 56-709, as redesignated by Ga. L.

1972, p. 1261, § 7; Ga. L. 1992, p. 3048, § 7.

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 43 Am. Jur. 2d, Insurance, § 32.

C.J.S. - 44 C.J.S., Insurance, § 70 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2001–2001 · leading case: Navarro v. Atlanta Cas. Co., 552 S.E.2d 508 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Navarro v. Atlanta Cas. Co., 552 S.E.2d 508 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “As originally passed, OCGA § 33-6-11 (c) did not require compliance with OCGA § 40-6-273, but required reporting in compliance with the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act, OCGA § 40-9-30, of the unknown driver.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.