O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-7-1 (2019)

Definitions of insurance not deemed mutually exclusive

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It is intended that certain coverages may come within the definitions of two or more kinds of insurance as set forth in this chapter, and the fact that the coverage is included within one definition shall not exclude the coverage as to any other kind of insurance within the definition of which the coverage likewise reasonably is includable.

History

Code 1933, § 56-401, enacted by Ga. L. 1960, p. 289, § 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2022 · leading case: Hill v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins., 249 P.3d 812 (Idaho 2011).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hill v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins., 249 P.3d 812 (Idaho 2011). “2d 41, 43 (1998) (citing Ga.Code Ann. §§ 33-7-1 1(b)(1)(D)(ii), 33-24-41.”

Hossain v. Nelson, 507 S.E.2d 243 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “309, 312 (238 SE2d *794 253) (1977) (negligent driver carrying minimum liability insurance is not an “uninsured motorist” within the meaning of OCGA § 33-7-1 l’s predecessor statute). See Strickland v.”

Randy Kelley v. The Cincinnati Ins. Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 33-7-1. Broadly, then, loss caused by an uninsured vehicle; to provide the procedure connected therewith; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other purposes.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.