O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 34-9-312 (2019)
Promulgation of rules and regulations by medical board as to making of examinations and autopsies; determination of location of examinations; procedure
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
by medical board in conducting medical investigations; reporting of investigations to full medical board and to State Board of Workers’ Compensation; reporting of final decision of medical board; procedure by parties for appealing final decision; rendering of decision by board on appeal; conclusiveness of medical board’s decisions as to medical questions. Reserved. Repealed by Ga. L. 1987, p. 1474, § 10, effective July 1, 1987.
Annotations
Editor’s notes. - This Code section was based on Code 1933, § 114-823, enacted by Ga. L. 1946, p. 103, Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 34. Ga. L. 1987, p. 1474, § 17, not
codified by the General Assembly, provided that that Act would apply to any occupational disease not previously diagnosed before July 1, 1987.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1989–1989 · leading case: Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Huggins, 379 S.E.2d 630 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989).
Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Huggins, 379 S.E.2d 630 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989). “On September 9, 1986, claimant filed her notice of appeal, interrogatories and request for oral examination of the members of the medical board pursuant to OCGA § 34-9-312 (e). The medical board reheard the case on December 11, 1986.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.