Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 36-34-2 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 36 LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Chapter 34 information not found

ARTICLE 3 COUNCIL OF MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGES

36-34-2. Powers relating to administration of government generally.

In addition to the other powers which it may have, the governing body of any municipal corporation shall have the following powers, under this chapter, relating to the administration of municipal government:

  1. The power to establish municipal offices, agencies, and employments;
  2. The power to define, regulate, and alter the powers, duties, qualifications, compensation, and tenure of all municipal officers, agents, and employees, provided that the members of the municipal governing body shall not have the right to fix or change their own terms or the terms of their successors, nor to alter their own salaries or compensation, except pursuant to the authority of Code Section 36-35-4, nor to alter such duties or responsibilities as are specifically given to a particular elective official by charter;
  3. The power to authorize any of the officers, agents, and employees of the municipal corporation to serve, in any manner prescribed by applicable law, any process, summons, notice, or order on all persons, as defined in Code Section 1-3-3 therein named, when:
    1. The paper to be served arises out of or relates to an activity or condition conducted or maintained by such person within the territorial jurisdiction of the municipal corporation in violation of an applicable law or ordinance; and
    2. The paper to be served originates in or is issued under the authority of the department or branch of municipal government employing such officer, agent, or employee.

      Where any such paper names one or more persons who reside outside the territorial jurisdiction of the municipal corporation, the several sheriffs, marshals, and constables of the several counties of this state are authorized and directed to serve any such paper and make appropriate return of such service by them, as other process is served and returned, on such named persons residing in their respective jurisdictions, upon receipt of a written request to make such service, for the fees allowed for service of process issued by the superior courts of this state;

  4. The power to establish merit systems, retirement systems, and insurance plans for all municipal employees and to establish insurance plans for school employees of independent municipal systems and to provide the method or methods of financing such systems and plans;
  5. The power to contract with any state department or agency or any other political subdivision for joint services or the exchange of services; to contract with such agencies or subdivisions for the joint use of facilities or equipment; and to contract with any state agency or political subdivision to perform any service or execute any project for such agency or subdivision in which the municipal corporation has an interest;
  6. The power to legislate, regulate, and administer all matters pertaining to absentee voting in municipal elections; and
    1. The power to grant franchises to or make contracts with railroads, street railways, or urban transportation companies, electric light or power companies, gas companies, steam-heat companies, telephone companies, water companies, and other public utilities for the use and occupancy of the streets of the city, for the purpose of rendering utility services, upon such conditions and for such time as the governing authority of the municipal corporation may deem wise and subject to the Constitution and the general laws of this state.
    2. The amount of fees collected from customers of public utilities or companies as a result of franchise agreements or contracts authorized by this paragraph shall be itemized on bills or invoices transmitted to customers for utility services. The requirements of this subparagraph shall not apply to fees that are included in the system-wide charges or base rates of a public utility or company subject to a franchise agreement or contract.

(Ga. L. 1962, p. 140, § 2; Ga. L. 1973, p. 778, § 2; Ga. L. 1976, p. 188, § 1; Ga. L. 1979, p. 645, § 1; Ga. L. 1987, p. 3, § 36; Ga. L. 1989, p. 812, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 2122, § 2; Ga. L. 1993, p. 91, § 36; Ga. L. 1995, p. 1189, § 1; Ga. L. 2007, p. 164, § 1/HB 107; Ga. L. 2012, p. 847, § 2/HB 1115.)

The 2012 amendment, effective July 1, 2012, deleted "and telegraph" following "telephone" in subparagraph (7)(A).

Cross references.

- Home rule powers of municipalities, Ga. Const. 1983, Art. IX, Sec. II, Paras. I-VII.

Extent of interest obtainable by condemnor upon condemnation, § 22-2-85.

Taxation of special franchises, § 48-5-420 et seq.

Code Commission notes.

- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1993, "compensation" was substituted for "compensations" in paragraph (2).

Law reviews.

- For article, "The Use of the Police Power by Local Governments and Some Problems of Intergovernmental Relations," see 8 J. of Pub. L. 109 (1959). For article, "Local Government and Contracts that Bind," see 3 Ga. L. Rev. 546 (1969).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

General Consideration

Editor's notes.

- In light of the similarity of the issues, decisions prior to enactment of this section are included in the annotations for this section.

Section not retrospective in operation.

- There is no intent expressed in paragraph (7) of O.C.G.A. § 36-34-2 or any of the remaining portions of that section which express an intent that the section be retrospective in the section's operation or act as a ratification for prior acts of a municipality. Blue Ridge Tel. Co. v. City of Blue Ridge, 161 Ga. App. 452, 288 S.E.2d 705 (1982).

Municipal corporation is a political division of the state, and is a public corporation, having for the municipality's object the administration of a portion of the power of government delegated to the municipality for such purpose. It is a creature of the General Assembly and the municipality's charter powers may be enlarged, lessened, or completely withdrawn at the will of the municipality's creator. Spence v. Rowell, 213 Ga. 145, 97 S.E.2d 350 (1957) (decided under former Code 1933, § 22-103).

Nature of powers possessed by municipal corporation.

- Municipal corporation possesses, and can exercise, the following powers, and no others: first, those granted in express words; second, those necessarily or fairly implied; third, those essential to the declared objects and purposes of the corporation - not simply convenient, but indispensable. Jewel Tea Co. v. City Council, 59 Ga. App. 260, 200 S.E. 503 (1938) (decided under former law).

Freedom to interpret powers.

- Grant of authority under O.C.G.A. § 36-34-2 does not define the means by which the cities would and could manage the city's affairs or prohibit municipal governing authorities from choosing how such powers shall be exercised. City of Atlanta v. McKinney, 265 Ga. 161, 454 S.E.2d 517 (1995).

Any fair, reasonable doubt concerning the existence of power is resolved by the courts against the municipal corporation. Jewel Tea Co. v. City Council, 59 Ga. App. 260, 200 S.E. 503 (1938) (decided under former law).

Disposition of business by resolution.

- Proper disposition of administrative business by council of municipal corporation is by resolution. Allen v. Wise, 204 Ga. 415, 50 S.E.2d 69 (1948) (decided under Ga. L. 1898, pp. 255, 256).

Estoppel of council to question legality of election.

- When a council by mistake of law duly advertised and held an election at the wrong time, participating as candidates themselves, the council are estopped from bringing an action quo warranto to question legality. Dorsey v. Ansley, 72 Ga. 460 (1884) (decided under Ga. L. 1872, p. 19).

City cannot regulate construction of substation on power company's property.

- City did not have the authority, under O.C.G.A. § 36-34-2(7), to regulate the construction of a power substation on property owned by the power company since the city's authority was limited to a utility's use of city property. City of Buford v. Ga. Power Co., 276 Ga. 590, 581 S.E.2d 16 (2003).

Cited in Georgia Power Co. v. Zimmerman, 133 Ga. App. 786, 213 S.E.2d 12 (1975); Savage v. City of Atlanta, 242 Ga. 671, 251 S.E.2d 268 (1978); Brown v. City of E. Point, 152 Ga. App. 801, 264 S.E.2d 267 (1979); City of Athens v. McGahee, 178 Ga. App. 76, 341 S.E.2d 855 (1986); City of LaGrange v. Troup County Elec. Membership Corp., 200 Ga. App. 418, 408 S.E.2d 708 (1991); Clark v. City of Zebulon, 156 F.R.D. 684 (N.D. Ga. 1993); Angell v. Hart, 232 Ga. App. 222, 501 S.E.2d 594 (1998).

Public Employees

Special legislation may not place restrictions in the form of mandatory collective bargaining upon the unlimited powers granted by Ga. L. 1962, p. 140, § 2 (see O.C.G.A. § 36-34-2) Local 574, Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters v. Floyd, 225 Ga. 625, 170 S.E.2d 394 (1969).

Conflicting special law unconstitutional.

- Georgia Laws 1968, p. 2953, providing for collective bargaining for Chatham County public employees, violates Ga. Const. 1976, Art. I, Sec. II, Para. VII (see Ga. Const. 1983, Art. III, Sec. VI, Para. IV) since it is a special law dealing with matters provided for by the general law under Ga. L. 1962, p. 140, §§ 1 and 2 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 36-34-1 and36-34-2). Local 574, Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters v. Floyd, 225 Ga. 625, 170 S.E.2d 394 (1969).

Collective bargaining not required.

- Powers of a municipality to regulate terms of employment may be executed by a city in any manner the city chooses, in the exercise of the city's nondelegable discretion. A city is not required to bargain collectively with any person or organization as to those powers. Local 574, Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters v. Floyd, 225 Ga. 625, 170 S.E.2d 394 (1969).

City ordinance increasing pension plan contribution rate.

- Trial court properly granted the city defendants summary judgment on the city employees' claims of breach of contract and unconstitutional impairment of contract regarding an ordinance increasing their pension plan contribution rate because the Georgia General Assembly expressly contemplated that a municipal corporation's provision for employee retirement or pension benefits would be subject to being supplemented by local law. Borders v. City of Atlanta, 298 Ga. 188, 779 S.E.2d 279 (2015).

Franchises

Granting by municipality of franchise to distribute electricity in municipality is not an ultra vires act. Singer v. City of Cordele, 225 Ga. 323, 168 S.E.2d 138 (1969).

When power to grant franchises stems from paragraph (7) of Ga. L. 1962, p. 140, § 2 (see O.C.G.A § 36-34-2), there is no violation of former Code 1933, § 69-202 (see O.C.G.A. § 36-30-3). City of Lithonia v. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 238 Ga. 339, 232 S.E.2d 832 (1977).

Municipality can set conditions.

- Municipality has the authority to condition the grant of a franchise upon requirements as the municipality deems wise. Athens-Clarke County v. Walton Elec. Membership Corp., 265 Ga. 229, 454 S.E.2d 510 (1995).

Authority of city to charge franchise fee.

- In O.C.G.A. § 46-3-14(b), nothing in the first sentence purports to prohibit a city from conditioning the city's grant of a street franchise to an electric company upon the payment of a reasonable franchise fee, and the second sentence is a statutory preservation of the right of a "municipality" under paragraph (7) of O.C.G.A. § 36-34-2 to charge "any secondary supplier" a franchise fee, even when the municipality itself is also the primary supplier. City of Calhoun v. North Ga. Elec. Membership Corp., 264 Ga. 205, 443 S.E.2d 469 (1994).

Effect of rate schedule compatible with exercise of municipality's discretion in granting franchises.

- Jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission stems from the Georgia Constitution. Therefore, any indirect effect which a rate schedule might have upon a municipality's exercise of the municipality's discretion in granting franchises is entirely compatible with the authority granted the municipalities by paragraph (7) of this section. City of Lithonia v. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 238 Ga. 339, 232 S.E.2d 832 (1977) (see O.C.G.A. § 36-34-2).

Electric company must show right to erect poles in land of highway.

- To justify setting up the company's poles in the land of a highway, a company which uses poles and wires in the transmission of electric currents must show that the company has acquired the right to do so, either by consent or condemnation from the owner of the soil. The designation by the municipality of the street where the poles may be set up is not enough. Donalson v. Georgia Power & Light Co., 175 Ga. 462, 165 S.E. 440 (1932).

Acquiescence in use of streets by telephone company.

- Acquiescence of the city during the period from the 1962 enactment of paragraph (7) of O.C.G.A. § 36-34-2 to the date of the judgment in the trial court, the city's acquiescence in the use of the city streets and the operation of the telephone system, is sufficient conduct on the part of the city so as to estop the city from denying the authority of the defendant telephone company to use the city streets during that period; but as the city's acquiescence did not carry any promise, explicit or implicit, that the city would allow this fait accompli to continue for any definite time or for any time into the future whatsoever, there is no basis upon which the city may be restrained from exercising the city's powers to abrogate this present informal arrangement. Blue Ridge Tel. Co. v. City of Blue Ridge, 161 Ga. App. 452, 288 S.E.2d 705 (1982).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

City may establish personnel department and merit board without the necessity of special Acts of the General Assembly. 1969 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 69-310.

City may set up retirement system for city employees without necessity of amending city charter. 1970 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U70-80.

State law does not prohibit grant of franchise to community antenna television system by municipality; cable television is not regulated by the Georgia Public Service Commission. 1970 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U70-190.

State not exempt from franchise fee when paid indirectly.

- While the state might not be required to pay a franchise fee or other tax directly to a city, in those situations where the state is paying money to a company, and that company is in turn remitting the money to the city as a franchise fee, it cannot be said that the state is the entity which is subject to the legal incidence of the tax so that it could successfully assert an exemption from such fees. 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 76-42.

Payment for utilities by department unaffected by taxes paid to municipality.

- Obligation of the Department of Administrative Services to pay for utilities at an established rate is not affected by the fact that the sums paid may include or reflect taxes paid by the provider of the services to a municipality. 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 76-42.

Municipal contributions to day care center.

- Unless a provision in the city charter allows such an expenditure, a city may not contribute to a day care center. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U84-14.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 163 et seq., 224, 236.

C.J.S.

- 29 C.J.S., Election, § 330 et seq. 37 C.J.S., Franchises, §§ 27, 28. 62 C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, §§ 143, 178, 416, 417, 490 et seq. 63 C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, § 863 et seq. 64 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, 1169, 1171, 1178, 1180, 1181, 1192, 1292 et seq., 1896 et seq.

ALR.

- Power of municipality to assume the duty of providing and maintaining railroad crossings, 1 A.L.R. 316.

Power of public service commission to increase franchise rates, 3 A.L.R. 730; 9 A.L.R. 1165; 28 A.L.R. 587; 29 A.L.R. 356.

Power of municipal council to correct its minutes, 3 A.L.R. 1308.

Power of municipality to exact license tax or fee from interurban carrier, 31 A.L.R. 594.

Power of municipal corporation to take out liability insurance, 33 A.L.R. 717.

Forfeiture of street railway franchise for breach of condition, 34 A.L.R. 1413.

Power of municipal corporation to purchase or charter a boat or barge, 39 A.L.R. 1332.

Power of municipal corporation to submit to arbitration, 40 A.L.R. 1370.

Liability of municipal corporation upon implied contract for use of property which it received under an invalid contract, 42 A.L.R. 632.

Liability of municipality as affected by license issued by municipal officer, 42 A.L.R. 1208.

Power of municipal corporation or authorities to employ detective, 45 A.L.R. 737.

Liability of municipal corporations and their licensees for the torts of independent contractors, 52 A.L.R. 1012.

Power of municipality to transfer or assign its right to enforce assessment or lien for local improvements, 55 A.L.R. 667.

Power of municipality to maintain public hack stand on property of carrier, 56 A.L.R. 767.

Power of municipal corporation to fix rates of motor vehicles for hire, 65 A.L.R. 1364.

Power of board to appoint officer or make contract extending beyond its own term, 70 A.L.R. 794; 149 A.L.R. 336.

Duration of street franchise without fixed term, beyond the life of the grantee, 71 A.L.R. 121.

Discretion of civil service commission as regards promotional examinations for eligible list, 75 A.L.R. 1234.

Power to include in municipal contract or proposal therefor, provisions designed to relieve local unemployment, or encourage local industries, 81 A.L.R. 255.

Power of municipality to fix specific scale of wages or hours for employees of contractors or subcontractors for municipal contracts, 81 A.L.R. 349; 129 A.L.R. 763.

Power of municipal corporation to employ attorney, 83 A.L.R. 135.

Power of municipality to extend license regulation or occupation tax beyond its own territorial limits, 86 A.L.R. 917.

Rights, duties, and remedy in respect of leasing or hiring public property to private person for occasional use, 86 A.L.R. 1175.

Estoppel of municipality to deny that it gave its consent to street franchise, 89 A.L.R. 619.

Profit factor in determining rates for municipally owned or operated public utility, 90 A.L.R. 700.

Disposition of revenues from operation of revenue-producing enterprise owned by municipal corporation, 103 A.L.R. 579; 165 A.L.R. 854.

Power of municipal corporation, as adjunct of public utility service furnished by it, to sell to consumers equipment necessary or convenient for use of the service, 108 A.L.R. 1454.

Power of municipality to classify for purposes of taxation as affected by classification made by state or its failure to classify, 110 A.L.R. 1203.

Right and duty of city and public utility upon expiration by limitation of street franchise, 112 A.L.R. 625.

Power of county or municipality to exempt from taxation or otherwise aid or subsidize private enterprises conducted for recreational, exhibition, or entertainment purposes, 116 A.L.R. 889.

Right of municipality to invoke constitutional provisions against Acts of state legislature, 116 A.L.R. 1037.

Right of municipality or other political subdivision to enforce against other party contract which was in excess of former's power, or which did not comply with the conditions of its power in that regard, 122 A.L.R. 1370.

Power of municipalities or other political subdivisions to engage in a joint project or enterprise, 123 A.L.R. 997.

Municipal ordinance relating to persons engaged in specified occupations or professions as applicable to officials or employees of state or political subdivision other than the municipality, 123 A.L.R. 1383.

Municipal license as affecting municipality's exercise of police power adversely to licensee, 124 A.L.R. 523.

Inclusion of different franchise rights or purposes in same ordinance, 127 A.L.R. 1049.

Power of municipality to agree to abide by conditions or regulations imposed by federal authority in respect of construction, maintenance, or operation of a municipal public utility plant or enterprise, 128 A.L.R. 620.

Public regulation of dry cleaning and dyeing establishments, 128 A.L.R. 678.

Statute relating to municipal fire departments as interference with local self-government, 141 A.L.R. 903.

Implied or inherent power of municipal corporation to sell its real property, 141 A.L.R. 1447.

Validity, construction, and application of municipal ordinances relating to loading or unloading passengers by interurban buses on streets, 144 A.L.R. 1119.

Certificates by state authorizing operation of motorbus lines over section of highway as affected by its subsequent annexation to city, 154 A.L.R. 1440.

Governmental body's right to enjoin breach of contract for unique or extraordinary services, 161 A.L.R. 881.

Power of municipal corporation to contribute financially to municipal league or other organizations of a similar character, 169 A.L.R. 1230.

Discrimination between property within and that outside municipality or other governmental district as to public service or utility rates, 4 A.L.R.2d 595.

Power of city, town, or county or their officials to compromise claim, 15 A.L.R.2d 1359.

Liability of municipality in damages for its refusal to grant permit, license, or franchise, 37 A.L.R.2d 694.

Power of municipality to sell, lease, or mortgage public utility plant or interest therein, 61 A.L.R.2d 595.

Power of municipal corporation to submit to arbitration, 20 A.L.R.3d 569.

Right of municipal corporation to recover back from contractor payments made under contract violating competitive bidding statute, 33 A.L.R.3d 397.

Validity and construction of municipal ordinances regulating community antenna television service (CATV), 41 A.L.R.3d 384.

Standing to contest award of, or acquisition of right to operate, cable TV certificate, license, or franchise in state court action, 78 A.L.R.3d 1255.

Validity, construction, and application of enactments relating to requirement of residency within or near specified governmental unit as condition of continued employment for policemen or firemen, 4 A.L.R.4th 380.

Placement, maintenance, or design of standing utility pole as affecting private utility's liability for personal injury resulting from vehicle's collision with pole within or beside highway, 51 A.L.R.4th 602.

Validity, construction, and application of state enactment, order, or regulation expressly prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination, 82 A.L.R.5th 1.

Construction and application of U.S. Const. Art. I, § 10, cl. 1, and state constitutional provisions proscribing state bills of attainder, 63 A.L.R. 6th 1.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 36-34-2

Total Results: 8  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

City of Atlanta v. McKinney, 265 Ga. 161 (Ga. 1995).

Cited 27 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 14, 1995 | 454 S.E.2d 517

...n, religion, sex, and sexual orientation as part of its regulation of city employment, events, and vendors. Besides a municipality's general police powers, state law grants cities power related to the administration of municipal government. See OCGA § 36-34-2....
...cised." Sadler v. Nijem, 251 Ga. 375, 378 (306 SE2d 257) (1983). Included among those powers is authority for cities "to define, regulate, and alter the powers, duties, qualifications, compensation, and tenure of all municipal . . . employees." OCGA § 36-34-2 (2)....
...Effingham County, supra at 47 (1). To the contrary, general anti-discrimination law is diluted by expansion of the number of protected classes which public or private entities are required to consider. The majority relies on the powers given to municipal corporations by OCGA § 36-34-2. While this statute may authorize ordinances prohibiting discrimination against a class protected by federal or state law, it does not authorize the expansion of protected classes. OCGA § 36-34-2 does not and cannot give a municipal corporation the power to enact an ordinance in violation of the constitutional provision on special laws, Ga....
Copy

Borders v. City of Atlanta, 298 Ga. 188 (Ga. 2015).

Cited 16 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 2, 2015 | 779 S.E.2d 279

...7 Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. IX, Sec. II, Par. III (a) (14). In addition, the General Assembly has expressly authorized municipalities to establish and finance retirement systems and to provide retirement and pension benefits. OCGA § 36-34-2 (4) confers upon the governing body of any municipal corporation, [t]he power to establish merit systems, retirement systems, and insurance plans for all municipal employees and to establish insurance...
Copy

Athens-Clarke Cnty. v. Walton Elec. Membership Corp., 265 Ga. 229 (Ga. 1995).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 13, 1995 | 454 S.E.2d 510, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 914

...the city streets in order *231to provide utility services and to make contracts with those utilities upon such conditions as the governing authority of the municipality deem wise, subject to the Constitution and the general laws of this state. OCGA § 36-34-2 (7); City of Calhoun v....
...More particularly, the Act recognizes the right of a municipality, as that term is defined in the Act, to grant a franchise to an electric supplier. OCGA § 46-3-14 (b). Implicit in that right is the municipality’s authority to condition the grant of the franchise upon requirements the municipality deems wise. OCGA § 36-34-2 (7)....
Copy

Sadler v. Nijem, 306 S.E.2d 257 (Ga. 1983).

Cited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 7, 1983 | 251 Ga. 375

...d council members of Valdosta, to call a referendum on the proposed amendment. The trial court upheld the City's determination, ruling that although the proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the Georgia Constitution, it would violate OCGA § 36-34-2 (2) (Code Ann....
...including "(1) The power to establish municipal offices, agencies, and employments; (2) The power to define, regulate, and alter the powers, duties, qualifications, compensation, and tenure of all municipal officers, agents, and employees...." OCGA § 36-34-2 (Code Ann....
...144, 146 (268 SE2d 912) (1980). City councils are, of course, bound by city charters, and amendments thereto. 3. The City's final contention, and the one with which the trial *378 court agreed, is that the proposed charter amendment runs afoul of a general law, OCGA § 36-34-2 (Code Ann. § 69-310), and thus violates Art. I, Sec. II, Par. VII, Const. 1976 (Code Ann. § 2-207) (Art. III, Sec. VI, Par. IV (a), Const. 1983 (Code Ann. § 2-1104)). OCGA § 36-34-2 (Code Ann. § 69-310), supra, was part of the 1962 home rule act. The City argues that the 1962 law, OCGA § 36-34-2 (Code Ann....
...In short, the 1962 act was intended to delegate power, not regulate its exercise. The case of Local 574 Intl. Assn. of Firefighters v. Floyd, 225 Ga. 625 (170 SE2d 394) (1969), finding a special law applicable to Chatham County and cities therein to be contrary to the 1962 act, now OCGA § 36-34-2 (Code Ann....
...ust as the governing authority heretofore has exercised the right to maintain a fire department. The rights of the "governing body" to choose how the powers of the City shall be exercised should not exceed the rights of the voters to so choose. OCGA § 36-34-2 (Code Ann....
Copy

City of Calhoun v. North Georgia Elec. Membership Corp., 264 Ga. 205 (Ga. 1994).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 2, 1994 | 443 S.E.2d 469, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1512

...for the use and occupancy of [its] streets . . ., for the purpose of rendering utility services, upon such conditions and for such time as [its] governing authority . . . may deem wise and subject to the Constitution and the general laws of this state. (Emphasis supplied.) OCGA § 36-34-2 (7)....
...There is no constitutional provision which would prohibit the City from requiring that NGEMC obtain a street franchise. Likewise, the Act itself is certainly not a general law of this state which provides for such a prohibition on the City’s authority under OCGA § 36-34-2 (7)....
...e fee. There is no constitutional provision which would prohibit the City from imposing such a condition. NGEMC urges, however, that the Act is a general law of this state which does provide for such a limitation on the City’s authority under OCGA § 36-34-2 (7)....
...ect to the payment, if any, by the primary supplier (other than the municipality itself) for the same or substantially identical rights. The first sentence of OCGA § 46-3-14 (b) is certainly a general limitation on the City’s authority under OCGA § 36-34-2 (7) to deny NGEMC a street franchise....
...payable.” Since the “municipality itself” is specifically excluded from the controlling class of “primary suppliers,” the second sentence of OCGA § 46-3-14 (b) is a statutory preservation of the right of a “municipality” under OCGA § 36-34-2 (7) to charge “any secondary supplier” a franchise fee, even where the “municipality itself’ is also the “primary supplier.” “[A]ny secondary supplier” is to pay a franchise fee “calculated and payable in the same manner...
Copy

City of Atlanta v. Morgan, 492 S.E.2d 193 (Ga. 1997).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 3, 1997 | 268 Ga. 586, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 4007

...can in no way be considered part of the definition of "dependent" as provided in Ordinance 96-O-1018 or to define a new family relationship contrary to State law. As we recognized in McKinney: [S]tate law grants cities power related to the administration of municipal government. See OCGA § 36-34-2....
Copy

City of MacOn v. Alltel Commc'ns, Inc., 596 S.E.2d 589 (Ga. 2004).

Cited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 3, 2004 | 277 Ga. 823, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 1522

...on, construction, maintenance, etc., and therefore, the statute's limiting language does not apply to a municipality's right to charge a "revenue producing and licensing fee." Instead, the City urges, that its right to charge a fee arises under OCGA § 36-34-2(7), [10] which gives the governing *594 body of a municipal corporation the "power to grant franchises to or make contracts" with utilities....
...Atlanta Gas Light Co., 262 Ga. 276, 278, 417 S.E.2d 13 (1992). The City seeks to free itself from the identical restriction in OCGA § 32-4-92(a)(10) by now characterizing the charged fee as a franchise fee or a revenue-producing tax, presumably authorized by OCGA § 36-34-2....
...1, 418 S.E.2d 367 (1992), quoting Anderson v. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co., 251 Ga. 556, 307 S.E.2d 499 (1983). [9] "[T]he express mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another." Morton v. Bell, 264 Ga. 832, 833, 452 S.E.2d 103 (1995). [10] OCGA § 36-34-2(7) states: In addition to the other powers which it may have, the governing body of any municipal corporation shall have the following powers, under this chapter, relating to the administration of municipal government: ......
Copy

City of Buford v. Georgia Power Co., 581 S.E.2d 16 (Ga. 2003).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 19, 2003 | 276 Ga. 590, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1565

...over any business activity regulated by the Public Service Commission beyond that authorized by charter or general law or by the Constitution." The City contends that this express preemption provision does not apply because (1) its charter and OCGA § 36-34-2(7) authorize the City to regulate the placement of substations under its police powers, and (2) the building of substations is not within the "business activity" of Georgia Power. [3] 2. The City's authority, found under its charter and OCGA § 36-34-2(7), to exercise police powers with respect to public utilities is limited to a utility's use of City property....
...ant franchises and make contracts with utilities is limited to "the use and occupancy of the streets of the city." [5] Georgia Power is not using City property. It is constructing the substation on its own property. Neither the City charter nor OCGA § 36-34-2(7) give the City authority to regulate substations on private property....
...I(c), is not applicable in this case. Compare Cobb County v. Georgia Transmission Corp., 276 Ga. 367, 578 S.E.2d 852 (2003); Rabun County v. Georgia Transmission Corp., 276 Ga. 81, 575 S.E.2d 474 (2003). [4] City of Buford Charter, Ga. L.1937-38, Ex. Sess., pp. 953, 1031. [5] OCGA § 36-34-2(7)....