O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 37-9-1 (2019)
Short title
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as ‘‘The Patient Cost of Care Act.’’
History
Ga. L. 1979, p. 834, § 1.
Annotations
Law reviews. - For note examining constitutional implications of this chapter, with a comparison of similar statutes and their treatment in other jurisdictions, see
12 Mercer L. Rev. 355 (1961). For note, ‘‘The Parity Cure: Solving Unequal Treatment of Mental Illness Health Insurance Through Federal Legislation,’’ see 44 Ga. L. Rev. 511 (2010).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1987–2012 · leading case: Garrison v. Dep't of Human Resources, 361 S.E.2d 860 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987).
Garrison v. Dep't of Human Resources, 361 S.E.2d 860 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987). “Plaintiff State of Georgia, Department of Human Resources seeks to recover a sum allegedly due from defendant Garrison under the provisions of “The Patient Cost of Care Act,” OCGA § 37-9-1 et seq. Defendant appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff.”
Newman v. State, 722 S.E.2d 911 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012). ““OCGA § 37-9-1 (9.1) provides that mentally ill persons require inpatient involuntary treatment if they present a substantial risk of imminent harm to themselves or others, or are so unable to care for their own physical health and safety as to create an imminently…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.