O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 39-2-21 (2019)

Injunctions

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person, firm, or corporation or agent thereof violating any of the provisions of this chapter may be enjoined from employing the minor involved in such violation upon the complaint of the Commissioner of Labor in the superior court of any county in which the employer may be doing business or employing such minor; provided, however, that any court order under this Code section shall be narrowly drawn and narrowly construed so as to provide the minimum possible disruption of the ongoing business affairs of the employer.

History

Code 1981, § 39-2-21, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1629, § 4.

CHAPTER 3 INTERSTATE COMPACT ON JUVENILES Sec. 39-3-1 through 39-3-7 [Repealed].

Annotations

Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘Interstate Cooperative Institutionalization - A Modern Device for Rehabilitation,’’ see 8 J. of Pub. L. 509 (1959). For article, ‘‘The

Interstate Compact on Juveniles: Development and Operation,’’ see 8 J. of Pub. L. 524 (1959).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Effect of compact on matters of adoption. - No provision of the interstate compact on juveniles has any effect

on the jurisdiction and authority of superior courts over matters of adoption. 1976 Op. Att’y Gen. No. U76-15.

39-3-1 through 39-3-7. Reserved. Repealed by Ga. L. 2014, p. 763, § 1-1/HB 898, effective July 1, 2014. Editor’s notes. - This chapter consisted of Code Sections 39-3-1 through 39-3-7, relating to interstate compact on

juveniles, and was based on Ga. L. 1972, p. 784, §§ 1-7; Ga. L. 1976, p. 1070, § 1.

T.39, C.4 INTERSTATE COMPACT ON PLACEMENT OF CHILDREN

CHAPTER 4 INTERSTATE COMPACT ON THE PLACEMENT OF CHILDREN Sec.

‘‘Appropriate public authority’’ defined. ‘‘Appropriate authority in the receiving state’’ defined. ‘‘Executive head’’ defined. Enactment and text of compact. Appointment of compact administrator. Supplementary agreements generally. Effect of placement of child in another state upon jurisdiction of court making placement.

Cross references. - Compliance with compact in adoption proceedings, § 19-8-4.

Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘Interstate Cooperative Institutionalization -

Sec.

Standards for determination of financial responsibility for children placed pursuant to compact. Applicability of Code Section 49-5-15 to placements made pursuant to compact. Satisfaction of requirements for visitation, inspection, or supervision of children, homes, institutions, or other agencies.

A Modern Device for Rehabilitation,’’ see 8 J. of Pub. L. 509 (1959). For annual survey article on workers’ compensation law, see 46 Mercer L. Rev. 535 (1994).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 2 Am. Jur. 2d, Adoption, §§ 107, 111, 115.

C.J.S. - 2 C.J.S., Adoption of Persons, §§ 45 et seq., 52.