O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 40-14-14 (2019)

Petition for reconsideration following permit suspension or revocation

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

At the expiration of six months following the suspension or revocation of a speed detection device permit by the Board of Public Safety or, if no appeal was taken, by the commissioner or deputy commissioner of public safety, the governing authority of any such county or municipality or the president of any such college or university may, upon a change of circumstances being shown to the commissioner, petition the commissioner for a reconsideration of whether such county, municipality, college, or university should be permitted to use speed detection devices within their respective jurisdictions.

History

(Ga. L. 1968, p. 425, § 11; Ga. L. 1977, p. 800, § 5; Ga. L. 1989, p. 586, § 1; Ga. L. 1996, p. 1281, § 14.)

Annotations

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Manner of permit reinstatement exclusive. - Once a local government unit’s speed detection device permit has been

revoked, the permit may only be reinstated subsequent to a petition for reconsideration. 1974 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 74-74.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2013–2013 · leading case: Michael C. Frasard v. State, No. A13A0629 (Ga. Ct. App. June 27, 2013).
Michael C. Frasard v. State, No. A13A0629 (Ga. Ct. App. June 27, 2013). · cites it 2× “When a speed detection device is operated by a county officer, moreover, we presume that the permit issued by the Department of Public Safety complied with OCGA § 40-14-14 such that an actual FCC license does not need to be produced to show a county officer’s compliance with the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.