O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 40-14-14 (2019)

Petition for reconsideration following permit suspension or revocation

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

At the expiration of six months following the suspension or revocation of a speed detection device permit by the Board of Public Safety or, if no appeal was taken, by the commissioner or deputy commissioner of public safety, the governing authority of any such county or municipality or the president of any such college or university may, upon a change of circumstances being shown to the commissioner, petition the commissioner for a reconsideration of whether such county, municipality, college, or university should be permitted to use speed detection devices within their respective jurisdictions.

History

(Ga. L. 1968, p. 425, § 11; Ga. L. 1977, p. 800, § 5; Ga. L. 1989, p. 586, § 1; Ga. L. 1996, p. 1281, § 14.)

Annotations

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Manner of permit reinstatement exclusive. - Once a local government unit’s speed detection device permit has been

revoked, the permit may only be reinstated subsequent to a petition for reconsideration. 1974 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 74-74.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2013–2013 · leading case: Michael C. Frasard v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Michael C. Frasard v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “When a speed detection device is operated by a county officer, moreover, we presume that the permit issued by the Department of Public Safety complied with OCGA § 40-14-14 such that an actual FCC license does not need to be produced to show a county officer’s compliance with the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.