O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 40-2-25.1 (2019)
1 . Redesignated.
✓ O.C.G.A.: 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Editor's notes. - Ga. L. 1990, p. 2048, § 2, effective July 1, 1990, redesignated former Code Section 40-2-25.1 as present Code Section 40-2-27 . API Error: Request was throttled. Expected available in 3 seconds. No results found for Georgia Code 40-2-25.1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1986–1989 · leading case: Georgia Auto. Importers Compliance v. Bowers, 639 F. Supp. 352 (N.D. Ga. 1986).
Georgia Auto. Importers Compliance v. Bowers, 639 F. Supp. 352 (N.D. Ga. 1986). “Upon review, the court finds that Georgia's statutes, O.C.G.A. §§ 40-2-25.1, 40-3-29.1, and 16-9-110 violate the preemption clause of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.”
Georgia Auto. Importers Compliance Ass'n v. Bowers, 639 F. Supp. 352 (N.D. Ga. 1986). “Upon review, the court finds that Georgia’s statutes, O.C.G.A. §§ 40-2-25.1, 40-3-29.1, and 16-9-110 violate the preemption clause of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.”
Sims v. Florida, Dep't of High. Saf. & Motor Vehs., 862 F.2d 1449 (11th Cir. 1989). “The District Court for the Northern District of Georgia addressed the constitutionality of Georgia statutes O.C.G.A. §§ 40-2-25.1 10 , 40-3-29.1 11 , and 16-9-110 12 (1985) in light of 15 U.”
Sims v. Florida, Dep't of High. Saf. & Motor Vehs., 832 F.2d 1558 (11th Cir. 1987). “352 (1986), the District Court for the Northern District of Georgia addressed the constitutionality of Georgia statutes O.C.G.A. §§ 40-2-25.1 12 , 40-3-29.1 13 , and 16-9-110 14 (1985) in light of 15 U.”
40-2-25.1(a): 4 cases
Georgia Auto. Importers Compliance v. Bowers, 639 F. Supp. 352 (N.D. Ga. 1986). “Upon review, the court finds that Georgia's statutes, O.C.G.A. §§ 40-2-25.1, 40-3-29.1, and 16-9-110 violate the preemption clause of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.”
Georgia Auto. Importers Compliance Ass'n v. Bowers, 639 F. Supp. 352 (N.D. Ga. 1986). “Upon review, the court finds that Georgia’s statutes, O.C.G.A. §§ 40-2-25.1, 40-3-29.1, and 16-9-110 violate the preemption clause of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.”
Sims v. Florida, Dep't of High. Saf. & Motor Vehs., 862 F.2d 1449 (11th Cir. 1989). “The District Court for the Northern District of Georgia addressed the constitutionality of Georgia statutes O.C.G.A. §§ 40-2-25.1 10 , 40-3-29.1 11 , and 16-9-110 12 (1985) in light of 15 U.”
Sims v. Florida, Dep't of High. Saf. & Motor Vehs., 832 F.2d 1558 (11th Cir. 1987). “352 (1986), the District Court for the Northern District of Georgia addressed the constitutionality of Georgia statutes O.C.G.A. §§ 40-2-25.1 12 , 40-3-29.1 13 , and 16-9-110 14 (1985) in light of 15 U.”
40-2-25.1(b): 2 cases
Georgia Auto. Importers Compliance v. Bowers, 639 F. Supp. 352 (N.D. Ga. 1986). “Upon review, the court finds that Georgia's statutes, O.C.G.A. §§ 40-2-25.1, 40-3-29.1, and 16-9-110 violate the preemption clause of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.”
Georgia Auto. Importers Compliance Ass'n v. Bowers, 639 F. Supp. 352 (N.D. Ga. 1986). “Upon review, the court finds that Georgia’s statutes, O.C.G.A. §§ 40-2-25.1, 40-3-29.1, and 16-9-110 violate the preemption clause of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.