O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 40-6-144 (2019)

Emerging from alley, driveway, or building; driving upon a sidewalk prohibited

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The driver of a vehicle emerging from an alley, building, private road, or driveway within a business or residential district shall stop such vehicle immediately prior to driving onto a sidewalk or onto the sidewalk area extending across such alley, building entrance, road, or driveway or, in the event there is no sidewalk area, shall stop at the point nearest the street to be entered where the driver has a view of approaching traffic thereon. The driver of a vehicle shall yield the right of way to any pedestrian on a sidewalk. Except as provided by resolution or ordinance of a local government for sidewalks within the jurisdiction of such local government authorizing the operation of bicycles on sidewalks by persons 12 years of age or younger, no person shall drive any vehicle upon a sidewalk or sidewalk area except upon a permanent or duly authorized driveway.

History

(Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dec. Sess., p. 556, § 88; Code 1933, §§ 68A-509, 68A-705, enacted by Ga. L. 1974, p. 633, § 1; Ga. L. 1990, p. 2048, § 5; Ga. L. 2009, p. 65, § 7/SB 196.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Hadden v. Owens, 154 Ga. App. 467, 268 S.E.2d 760 (1980); Money v. Daniel, 188 Ga. App. 215, 372 S.E.2d 305

(1988); Noellien v. State, 298 Ga. App. 47, 679 S.E.2d 75 (2009).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 7A Am. Jur. 2d, Automobiles and Highway Traffic, § 304.

C.J.S. - 60A C.J.S., Motor Vehicles, § 822.

ARTICLE 8 SCHOOL BUSES Cross references. - Accident insurance for children being transported by school bus, § 20-2-1090 et seq. Duty of drivers of school buses to stop at railroad crossings, § 40-6-142. Equipment of school buses, § 40-8-110 et seq.

Administrative rules and regulations. - Public School Bus Inspection, Official Compilation of the Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia, Department of Public Safety, Chapter 570-30.

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Editor’s notes. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under former Code 1933, §§ 68A-706 and 68-1667 are included in the annotations for this article. Waiver of equipment standards. -

There was no authority which would allow a waiver of equipment standards enumerated in former Code 1933, §§ 68A-706 and 68-1667. 1977 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 77-43 (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 68A-706 and 68-1667).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 7A Am. Jur. 2d, Automobiles and Highway Traffic, § 282. Am. Jur. Proof of Facts. - Liability of School Bus Driver or School for Injury to Child Going to or from School Bus, 13 POF3d 475.

C.J.S. - 60A C.J.S., Motor Vehicles, § 719. ALR. - Carrier’s liability to person in street or highway for purpose of boarding its vehicle, 7 A.L.R.2d 549.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–1990 · leading case: Money v. Daniel, 372 S.E.2d 305 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988).
Money v. Daniel, 372 S.E.2d 305 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “" OCGA § 40-6-144 provides that "[t]he driver of a vehicle emerging from an alley, building, private road, or driveway within a business or residential district shall stop such vehicle immediately prior to driving onto a sidewalk or onto the sidewalk area extending across such…”
Love v. State, 393 S.E.2d 520 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “12 grams, in violation of OCGA § 40-6-391 (a)(4), and emerging from an alley or private drive without stopping, in violation of OCGA § 40-6-144. During the trial, he objected to the introduction of the results of a police intoximeter test which had been administered to him…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.