Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 40-6-3 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 40-6-3 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 40-6-3

TITLE 40 MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC

Section 6. Uniform Rules of the Road, 40-6-1 through 40-6-397.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

40-6-3. Chapter refers to operation of vehicles on highways; exceptions; vehicle accident reports and private property.

  1. The provisions of this chapter relating to the operation of vehicles refer to the operation of vehicles upon highways except:
    1. Where a different place is specifically referred to in a given Code section;
    2. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to a vehicle operated at shopping centers or parking lots or similar areas which although privately owned are customarily used by the public as through streets or connector streets;
    3. The provisions of this chapter relating to reckless driving, driving in violation of Code Section 40-6-391, and homicide by vehicle shall apply to vehicles operated upon highways and elsewhere throughout the state;
    4. The provisions of Code Sections 40-6-270, 40-6-271, and 40-6-272 shall apply upon the highways of this state, in all parking areas, and in all areas which are customarily open to the public and within 200 feet of all such highways, parking areas, and areas customarily open to the public;
      1. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to a vehicle operated on any private property of this state which fronts on coastal marshlands or estuarine area as defined in Code Section 12-5-282, provided the owner of the private property files with the local law enforcement agency having primary jurisdiction to enforce the uniform rules of the road in such area:
        1. A petition requesting such local law enforcement agency to enforce the uniform rules of the road on such private property; and
        2. Simultaneously files a plat with the petition delineating the location of the roads, streets, and common areas on such private property.
      2. The local law enforcement agency having primary jurisdiction to enforce the uniform rules of the road in such area shall enforce the uniform rules of the road on said private property at no cost to the owner of the private property or enter into a contractual agreement with the owner of the private property whereby the owner of the private property consents to pay part or all of the law enforcement expenses to such law enforcement agency.
      3. All persons operating vehicles on said roads, streets, and common areas shall be subject to all state and local traffic laws and regulations the same as if said private roads and streets were public roads and streets.
      4. Any state or local law enforcement agency empowered to enforce the uniform rules of the road in such area shall have concurrent jurisdiction with the primary local law enforcement agency to enforce the rules of the road on said private property.
      5. At least 30 days' prior notice shall be given to users of said private roads, streets, and common areas by publication in the newspapers of general circulation in the area and by posting signs along the private roads and streets specifying that state and local law enforcement agencies will be enforcing the uniform rules of the road on said private roads, streets, and common areas; and
      1. Subject to the approval of the governing authority of the county or municipality, the provisions of this chapter shall apply to a vehicle operated within a privately owned residential area located within the corporate boundaries of a municipality or located within the boundaries of a county, provided the owner of the privately owned residential area files with the governing authority of such county or municipality:
        1. A petition signed by 50 percent of the property owners located in said subdivision requesting the law enforcement agency of the county or municipality to enforce the uniform rules of the road within such privately owned residential area; and
        2. A plat delineating the location of roads, streets, and common areas within the privately owned residential area.
      2. Upon approval by the governing authority of the county or municipality, the law enforcement agency of such county or municipality shall enforce the uniform rules of the road within said privately owned residential area.
      3. All persons operating vehicles on the roads, streets, and common areas of said privately owned residential property shall be subject to all state and local traffic laws and regulations the same as if such private roads, streets, and common areas were public roads and streets.
      4. At least 30 days' prior notice shall be given to users of said private roads, streets, and common areas by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the area and by posting signs along the private road, streets, and common areas specifying that the county law enforcement agency or municipal law enforcement agency will be enforcing the uniform rules of the roads on said private roads, streets, and common areas.
  2. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this Code section, any law enforcement officer shall be authorized to write an accident report regarding any motor vehicle accident occurring on private property.

(Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dec. Sess., p. 556, § 22; Code 1933, § 68A-103, enacted by Ga. L. 1974, p. 633, § 1; Ga. L. 1983, p. 1000, § 11; Ga. L. 1985, p. 758, § 15; Ga. L. 1986, p. 834, § 1; Ga. L. 1990, p. 2048, § 5; Ga. L. 1991, p. 1000, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 2294, § 2.)

Cross references.

- Off-road vehicles, T. 40, C. 7.

Code Commission notes.

- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1991, "and" was inserted at the end of division (a)(6)(A)(i).

Law reviews.

- For note on the 1991 amendment of this Code section, see 8 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 152 (1992).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Exact location of operating motor vehicle under influence of an intoxicant is not a material element of this offense and the accusation is sufficiently certain if the accusation charges that the offense was committed in a particular county. Felchlin v. State, 159 Ga. App. 120, 282 S.E.2d 743 (1981); Russell v. State, 174 Ga. App. 436, 330 S.E.2d 175 (1985).

Exact location is not a material element of the offense of reckless driving and a fatal variance did not exist as to the charge even though the state failed to prove that the defendant drove recklessly in a certain block of road as alleged in the indictment. Chavous v. State, 205 Ga. App. 455, 422 S.E.2d 327 (1992).

Applicability of chapter.

- Uniform Act Regulating Traffic or Highways applies to streets and highways within corporate limits of municipalities as well as without. Richards & Assocs. v. Studstill, 92 Ga. App. 853, 90 S.E.2d 56 (1955), rev'd on other grounds, 212 Ga. 375, 93 S.E.2d 3 (1956).

It is criminal offense to operate a motor vehicle under influence of intoxicants anywhere in state, and the place is, therefore, no longer a material element of the offense. Flanders v. State, 97 Ga. App. 779, 104 S.E.2d 538 (1958); Walker v. State, 201 Ga. App. 672, 411 S.E.2d 734, cert. denied, 201 Ga. App. 904, 411 S.E.2d 734 (1991).

Because: (1) O.C.G.A. § 40-6-391(a), by the statute's plain language, applied to any moving vehicle, and a golf cart was a "vehicle" within the meaning of O.C.G.A. § 40-1-1(75); (2) the defendant stipulated at trial to driving the golf cart in Fayette County, making such a "moving vehicle" within the scope of O.C.G.A. § 40-6-391(a), and to being under the influence of alcohol while doing so; and (3) under O.C.G.A. § 40-6-3(a)(3), the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 40-6-391 applied anywhere in Georgia, whether on a street, highway, or private property, the defendant's DUI conviction was upheld on appeal. Simmons v. State, 281 Ga. App. 252, 635 S.E.2d 849 (2006).

In convictions of driving while under the influence, a jury charge did not create ambiguity and confusion, requiring reversal, by using the word "anywhere" rather than the word "elsewhere" because under O.C.G.A. § 40-6-3(a)(3), the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 40-6-391 applied anywhere in Georgia. Duprel v. State, 301 Ga. App. 469, 687 S.E.2d 863 (2009), overruled on other grounds by Zilke v. State, 299 Ga. 232, 787 S.E.2d 745 (2016).

"Highway" as a "public highway."

- To prove that a "highway" is a "public highway," there must be proof that it was established in one of the ways enumerated in the case of Southern Ry. v. Combs, 124 Ga. 1004, 53 S.E. 508 (1906). Baker v. State, 92 Ga. App. 60, 87 S.E.2d 644 (1955).

Parking lot.

- Trial court properly denied suppression of drug evidence obtained from a search of the defendant's person after a police officer conducted an investigatory stop of the defendant's vehicle and noted a strong odor of marijuana as the officer stopped the vehicle based on a reasonable suspicion that the defendant was violating O.C.G.A. § 40-6-14(a) by the loud music emanating from the defendant's vehicle while parked in a convenience store parking lot pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 40-6-3(a)(2). Jackson v. State, 297 Ga. App. 615, 677 S.E.2d 782 (2009), cert. denied, No. S09C1461, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 409 (Ga. 2009).

Cited in Madden v. State, 252 Ga. App. 164, 555 S.E.2d 832 (2001); Patton v. State, 287 Ga. App. 18, 650 S.E.2d 733 (2007).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

- Applicability of regulations or rules governing vehicular traffic to driveways or other places not legal highways, 80 A.L.R. 469.

Applicability, to operation of motor vehicle on private property, of legislation making drunken driving a criminal offense, 29 A.L.R.3d 938.

Motorist's liability for signaling other vehicle or pedestrian to proceed, or to pass signaling vehicle, 14 A.L.R.5th 193.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 40-6-3

Total Results: 1  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Thornton v. State, 310 Ga. 460 (Ga. 2020).

Cited 13 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 12, 2020

...discharge of his official duties at the time of the incident. The Court of Appeals held that the game warden was authorized under OCGA 4 § 40-13-30 to enforce the Rules of the Road, see Thornton, 353 Ga. App. at 254-255 (1), and it cited OCGA § 40-6-3 (a) (2) for the proposition that the Rules of the Road apply in parking lots, see 353 Ga....
...Do the provisions of OCGA § 40-6-1 et seq. apply generally to privately owned shopping centers, parking lots, or other similar areas that are not customarily used by the public as through streets or connector streets, see OCGA § 40-6-3 (a) (2)? As we explain below, the answer to the first question is yes, game wardens do have authority to enforce the Rules of the Road at any location in Georgia where OCGA § 40-13-30 applies....
...encountered Thornton, his attempts to enforce OCGA § 40-6-14 against Thornton would not have been in the lawful discharge of his official duties for purposes of an obstruction conviction. In general, 15 OCGA § 40-6-3 (a) provides that “[t]he provisions of this chapter[8] relating to the operation of vehicles refer to the operation of vehicles upon highways[,]” and for the purposes of Title 40, a “highway” is defined as “the entire width between the boundary lines of every way publicly maintained when any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel.” OCGA § 40-1-1 (19). In addition, OCGA § 40-6-3 (a) (2) provides that the Rules of the Road also apply to “a vehicle operated at shopping centers or parking lots or similar areas which although privately owned are customarily used by the public as through streets or connector streets[.]” According to the State, OCGA § 40-6-3 (a) (2) means that the Rules of the Road apply in all “shopping centers [and] parking lots” — including, for instance, the parking lot of the gas station in this case — as well as in privately-owned “similar areas which . . . are customarily used by the public as through streets or connector streets.” Thornton, on the other hand, contends that OCGA § 40-6-3 8 “[T]his chapter” refers to Chapter 6 of Title 40, the Rules of the Road. See note 2 supra. 16 (a) (2) applies the Rules of the Road to the locations identified in the statute — “shop...
... understandings of the statute proposed by the parties, we must assess the qualifying phrase by reference to “its situation within and relationship to the entire statutory text.” Id. at 573 (2). Examining the text, structure, and context of OCGA § 40-6-3 (a) (2), we conclude that Thornton is right, and the qualifying phrase is most naturally and reasonably understood to modify all of the terms in the series that precedes it. By its use of the adjective “similar” to modify the “areas,” OCGA § 40-6-3 (a) (2) suggests that “shopping centers [and] parking lots” are linked to other “similar areas” to form a singular, cohesive set of locations, and this cohesive set is then qualified by reference to the customary usage of these locations by the public. Understanding OCGA § 40-6-3 (a) (2) in this way also fits naturally with the provision of OCGA § 40-6-3 (a) that the Rules of the Road apply generally to highways. Indeed, the general provision of OCGA § 40-6-3 (a) with respect to highways effectively extends the Rules of the Road to “every way publicly maintained when any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel[,]” and construed most reasonably, 18 OCGA § 40-6-3 (a) (2) is understood to extend the same Rules of the Road to privately owned property — whether a “shopping center,” a “parking lot,” or another “similar area” — that likewise is customarily used by the public as a “through street” or a “connector street,” that is, used as if it were a public way.9 This understanding also finds support in other paragraphs of subsection 40-6-3 (a)....
...provisions of the Rules of the Road regarding a driver’s duties after an accident “shall apply upon the highways of this state, in all parking areas, and in all areas which are customarily open to the 9 The alternative understanding of OCGA § 40-6-3 (a) (2) proposed by the State would mean that, for instance, the Rules of the Road would apply in a private, gated parking lot that is inaccessible to the public, but the Rules of the Road typically would not apply to a private, ungated dr...
...gated parking lot) likely would not be customarily used by the public as a through street or connector street. 19 public and within 200 feet [thereof].” (Emphasis supplied.) Similarly broad language was not used in OCGA § 40-6-3 (a) (2) to make clear that all shopping centers and all parking lots are covered by the Rules of the Road, and this omission suggests that paragraph (a) (2) has a narrower scope....
...Road applicable in all parking lots. See Kennedy v. Carlton, 294 Ga. 576, 578 (2) (757 SE2d 46) (2014) (courts should “avoid[ ] a statutory construction that will render some of the statutory language mere surplusage”). In sum, reading OCGA § 40-6-3 (a) (2) in the context of the other paragraphs of subsection 40-6-3 (a) reinforces the conclusion that paragraph (a) (2) is most reasonably understood to extend the Rules of the Road only to those privately owned shopping centers, parking lots, and similar areas that are customarily used by the public as through or connector streets....