O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 43-21-2 (2019)

Depositories for hire

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Persons entertaining only a few individuals, or simply for the accommodation of travelers, are not innkeepers but are depositories for hire and are bound to ordinary diligence.

History

Orig. Code 1863, § 2100; Code 1868, § 2095; Code 1873, § 2121; Code 1882,

§ 2121; Civil Code 1895, § 2939; Civil Code 1910, § 3512; Code 1933, § 52-102.

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. Justification of guest in leaving hotel or boarding house before expiration of contract, 10 A.L.R. 127.

What constitutes a hotel or inn, 53 A.L.R. 988.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Efficiency Lodge, Inc. v. Neason, 889 S.E.2d 789 (Ga. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Efficiency Lodge, Inc. v. Neason, 889 S.E.2d 789 (Ga. 2023). · cites it 4× “” OCGA § 43-21-2. Someone who qualifies as a depository for hire under this provision is not an inn- keeper, but neither are they likely a landlord to travelers passing through.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.