O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 43-29-5 (2019)

Jurisdiction of board

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The board shall have exclusive jurisdiction in the enforcement of this chapter over all persons engaged in business as dispensing opticians, whether licensed or unlicensed, provided that nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed as limiting or abrogating the power or authority of any board or commission created under any of the laws of this state defining and regulating any profession to enforce such respective laws or exercising any of the powers contained in such laws against violators thereof, even though engaged in the business of dispensing optician.

History

Ga. L. 1956, p. 148, § 2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Mumtaz M. Alli v. Ultra Grp. of Companies, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mumtaz M. Alli v. Ultra Grp. of Companies, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “ation cases); OCGA § 40-13-29 (granting “exclusive jurisdiction of all traffic misdemeanor cases” in probate court in certain counties under certain circumstances); OCGA § 43-29-5 (granting the State Board of Dispensing Opticians “exclusive jurisdiction” of certain matters);…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.