O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 44-14-265 (2019)

Service of notice to defendant

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When an immediate writ of possession has been granted, a copy of the petition, the affidavits, the waiver or bond, and the order shall be served in any manner provided in Code Section 44-14-232 as if the petition were one filed under Code Section 44-14-231.

History

Code 1933, § 67-713, enacted by Ga. L. 1975, p. 1213, § 3.

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 69 Am. Jur. 2d, Secured Transactions, §§ 607-614.

C.J.S. 14 C.J.S., Chattel Mortgages, §§ 183, 404.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1987–2012 · leading case: Deutz-Allis Credit Corp. v. Phillips, 360 S.E.2d 29 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Deutz-Allis Credit Corp. v. Phillips, 360 S.E.2d 29 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 44-14-265. Upon arrival at the Clenney farm E.”
Mathis v. River City Bank, 731 S.E.2d 788 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “no later than 30 days after service as provided for under Code Section 44-14-265, the defendant may appear and file any legal or equitable defense or counterclaim to the petitioner’s claim for a writ of immediate possession.”
Christopher Mathis v. River City Bank, No. A12A1403 (Ga. Ct. App. Aug. 31, 2012). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 44-14-267 pertinently provides that no later than 30 days after service has been provided for under Code Section 44-14-265, the defendant may appear and file any legal or equitable defense or counterclaim to the petitioner’s claim for writ of immediate possession.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.