O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 44-2-143 (2019)

Notation of liens and lis pendens on register; effect absent notation

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No judgment, levy, or other lien except a lien for taxes for which special provision is made in this article shall be effective against registered land so as to affect any person taking a transfer thereof or obtaining any right or interest therein unless and until a notation of such judgment, levy, or lien is made upon the title register. The pendency of any action affecting the title to registered land or any interest therein shall not be held to be notice to any person other than the actual parties to such action unless a notation

of the pendency of such action is made upon the title register.

History

(Ga. L. 1917, p. 108, § 54; Code 1933, § 60-426.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Lankford v. Milhollin, 203 Ga. 491, 47 S.E.2d 70 (1948). RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 66 Am. Jur. 2d, Records and Recording Laws, §§ 39, 46. C.J.S. - 76 C.J.S., Registration of Land Titles, §§ 22, 27.

ALR. - Lis pendens as affecting property in county or district other than that in which action is pending, 71 ALR 1085.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1997–1997 · leading case: United States v. 408 Peyton Road, S.W. (11th Cir. 1997).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. 408 Peyton Road, S.W. (11th Cir. 1997). “Ga. Code Ann. § 44-2-143 . 4 1994, Appellant Richardson filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the Government’s failure to provide preseizure notice and a hearing deprived him of property without due process, in violation of the Fifth Amendment.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.