O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 44-2-226 (2019)

Certificate of mailing; entry of such certificate on petition

✓ O.C.G.A.: 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The clerk should also enter on the petition a certificate substantially in the following form:

I certify that on the ________ day of ________________________, ________, I mailed to each of the following persons a copy of the within petition and process to his post office address as disclosed by the record:

________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ and that advertisement has been published in accordance with law, a copy of said advertisement being hereto attached.

This ________ day of ________________________, ________.

___________________________________________________________________ Clerk

History

(Ga. L. 1917, p. 108, § 91; Code 1933, § 60-607; Ga. L. 1999, p. 81, § 44.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2015 · leading case: Marino v. Clary Lakes Homeowners Ass'n, 770 S.E.2d 289 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marino v. Clary Lakes Homeowners Ass'n, 770 S.E.2d 289 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “at 842 ; see also OCGA § 44-2-226 (a). Id. at 843. Id. Id. Id.”
Patricia Marino v. Clary Lakes Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “at 842 ; see also OCGA § 44-2-226 (a). 16 Id. at 843. 5 After the parties filed cross motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled that the Garage Use Covenant was not subject to either the written-consent requirement imposed by OCGA § 44-5-60 (d) (4) or the two-thirds…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.