O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 44-6-63 (2019)

Interest of heirs of remainderman

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Reserved. Repealed by Ga. L. 1994, p. 364, § 2, effective March 25, 1994.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - This Code section was based on Orig. Code 1863, § 2248; Code 1868, § 2240; Code 1873, § 2266; Code

1882, § 2266; Civil Code 1895, § 3101; Civil Code 1910, § 3677; Code 1933, § 85-704.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1988–2013 · leading case: Folsom v. Rowell, 640 S.E.2d 5 (Ga. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Folsom v. Rowell, 640 S.E.2d 5 (Ga. 2007). · cites it 8× “At the same time that OCGA § 44-6-63 was repealed, the legislature also enacted a new statute which clearly made all remainder interests, whether vested or contingent, inheritable: “Future interests or estates are descendible, devisable, and alienable in the same manner as…”

Swanson v. Swanson, 514 S.E.2d 822 (Ga. 1999). · cites it 4× “See OCGA § 44-6-63 (a); Armstrong v. Merts, 202 Ga.”

Wilkes v. Fraser, 751 S.E.2d 455 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “Although this statute, later revised and re-codified at OCGA § 44-6-63, was repealed in 1994, Ga.”

Tift v. Gentner, 371 S.E.2d 391 (Ga. 1988). · cites it 4× “We find the answer to the problem in OCGA § 44-6-63. This section provides that a contingent remainder limited to an event is inherited by the heirs of the remaindermen, while a contingent remainder limited as to a person is not.”

James David Wilkes v. Nell Wilkes Fraser (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “Although this statute, later revised and re-codified at OCGA § 44-6-63, was repealed in 1994, Ga.”

— 44-6-63(a) — 1 case

Swanson v. Swanson, 514 S.E.2d 822 (Ga. 1999). “See OCGA § 44-6-63 (a); Armstrong v. Merts, 202 Ga.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.